Cash Transfers Paired With Mental Health Counseling Show Mixed Results In Ethiopia Study
Auf einen Blick
A study in Ethiopia tested pairing cash transfers with mental health counseling to reduce poverty, yielding mixed results: cash alone improved income, therapy alone showed short-term mental health gains that faded, and combined benefits were marginal, especially in conflict-affected areas.
KI-generierte Zusammenfassung
Warum es wichtig ist
Poverty and mental health are intertwined in low-income settings, with each exacerbating the other.
Cash transfers have become one of the most widely used tools for reducing poverty around the world. Economists, though, are still looking for ways to produce longer-term impact, and that is the idea behind a new study from Ethiopia. Researchers tested whether pairing cash with mental health counseling could help people build more stable lives. But when an ongoing conflict spread into some of the villages in the program, it produced unexpected results, as NPR's Fatma Tanis reports.
In low-income settings, poverty and mental health are often locked in a vicious cycle, says Melissa Hidrobo. She's a senior fellow with the International Food Policy Research Institute.
"Poor mental health can impair your decision-making. It can reduce your productivity. At the same time, the stresses of poverty, such as not having enough food to eat, can also exacerbate ill mental health."
In 2022, the aid organization World Vision received funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development, now dismantled by the Trump administration. The goal was to improve the lives of poor households in Ethiopia. Hidrobo joined as lead researcher.
"What we wanted to see, as researchers, was whether interventions that target poverty and also mental health are more effective."
In about 250 villages in the Amhara and Oromia regions of Ethiopia, households were divided into four groups. One group received nothing. The second had group therapy only, a third got cash, a lump sum of $279, and the last group received both the cash and the therapy. The therapy was designed to broadly address issues of depression, stress and anxiety.
But then something else happened that the researchers hadn’t foreseen, says Michael Mulford. He's senior director of the Global Poverty Research Lab at Northwestern University and was in Ethiopia as project manager for World Vision.
"There was a conflict that spilled over into the Amhara region and significantly affected all of our operational areas."
Armed groups would enter the villages, terrorizing people and often robbing them. Mulford was present in many of the group therapy sessions in the conflict zone and witnessed how it exacerbated stress and led to lack of sleep and appetite.
"One of the women talked about how her husband had died due to the conflict, was really depressed and withdrawn and, you know, kind of unable to think about what to do next."
The interventions lasted until 2024. Researchers collected data immediately after, says Hidrobo.
"We saw large improvements in the group on mental health of the group therapy."
Then they collected more data 16 months later.
"Sixteen months later, we no longer saw those. And so I think that was one of the big surprises."
In the long term, households that only received therapy did not see improvements in income or productivity. By contrast, people who received the cash alone had done much better, investing in livestock and savings. And those who received both cash and therapy had a slight income edge. For those in the conflict setting, therapy was not effective at all.
Frank Schilbach studies behavioral economics at MIT and was not involved in the study. He says he wants to know more about how cost effective the initiative was so policymakers could take that into account. But he also thinks the research has important insights.
"So this specific study shows that the effect of therapy on top of giving people cash appeared to be effective in particular for people who are not prone to conflict."
Still, he says the therapy didn’t lead to transformative results.
"It's not enough to take a population that's psychologically distress without providing them, also, with a lot of opportunities."
Like more education or job opportunities so they can take advantage of the mental health support. And he says poor people who are also dealing with conflict might need more specialized psychological help.
Researchers say they hope to get more opportunities to further study the effect of cash and therapy in a variety of settings.
Fatma Tanis, NPR News.
Worauf zu achten ist
KI-Ausblick — Möglichkeiten, keine Fakten
Further research will explore cash+therapy in stable settings
Wahrscheinlich · Innerhalb von Monaten
Offene Fragen
- Long-term cost-effectiveness of cash+therapy interventions
- Scalability in non-conflict areas







