Newsgather
Back|Constitutional Court to Review Law on Special Courts for Sedition Cases
Constitutional Court to Review Law on Special Courts for Sedition Cases
NACHRICHTAI
μ—°ν•©λ‰΄μŠ€Β·7 sa ΓΆnceΒ·πŸ‡°πŸ‡·South KoreaΒ·Law

Constitutional Court to Review Law on Special Courts for Sedition Cases

1 dk okumaΒ·%60 ΓΆnemΒ·284 kelime
#constitutionalcourt#constitutionalappeal#sedition#rebellion#specialcourts#fairtrial#KimYong-hyun#YoonSuk-yeol
μ—°
μ—°ν•©λ‰΄μŠ€
YayΔ±ncΔ±
Schriftgrâße

κΉ€μš©ν˜„ μ „ κ΅­λ°©λΆ€ μž₯κ΄€ 츑이 λ‚΄λž€μ „λ‹΄μž¬νŒλΆ€λ²•μ— λŒ€ν•΄ λ‚Έ ν—Œλ²•μ†Œμ›μ΄ ν—Œλ²•μž¬νŒμ†Œμ˜ 정식 νŒλ‹¨μ„ λ°›λŠ”λ‹€.

4일 법쑰계에 λ”°λ₯΄λ©΄ ν—Œμž¬λŠ” κΉ€ μ „ μž₯κ΄€ 츑이 'λ‚΄λž€Β·μ™Έν™˜Β·λ°˜λž€ 범죄 λ“±μ˜ ν˜•μ‚¬μ ˆμ°¨μ— κ΄€ν•œ νŠΉλ‘€λ²•'(λ‚΄λž€μ „λ‹΄μž¬νŒλΆ€λ²•)에 λŒ€ν•΄ λ‚Έ ν—Œλ²•μ†Œμ›μ„ μ§€λ‚œ 2일 정식 μ‹¬νŒμ— νšŒλΆ€ν–ˆλ‹€.

ν—Œμž¬λŠ” μž¬νŒκ΄€ 3λͺ…μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±λœ μ§€μ •μž¬νŒλΆ€λ₯Ό 톡해 ν—Œλ²•μ†Œμ›μ΄ 법적 μš”κ±΄μ„ κ°–μ·„λŠ”μ§€ νŒλ‹¨ν•œλ‹€.

μ§€μ •μž¬νŒλΆ€μ—μ„œ 법적인 ν•˜μžκ°€ μ—†λ‹€κ³  νŒλ‹¨ν•˜λ©΄ μž¬νŒκ΄€ 9λͺ…이 μ‹¬λ¦¬ν•˜λŠ” μ „μ›μž¬νŒλΆ€μ— νšŒλΆ€ν•œλ‹€.

κΉ€ μ „ μž₯κ΄€ 츑은 λ‚΄λž€μ „λ‹΄μž¬νŒλΆ€λ²•μ΄ κ³΅μ •ν•œ μž¬νŒμ„ 받을 ꢌ리λ₯Ό μΉ¨ν•΄ν•œλ‹€λ©° μ§€λ‚œ 4μ›” μ„œμšΈκ³ λ²• λ‚΄λž€μ „λ‹΄μž¬νŒλΆ€μΈ ν˜•μ‚¬12-1λΆ€(이승철 쑰진ꡬ κΉ€λ―Όμ•„ κ³ λ²•νŒμ‚¬)에 μœ„ν—Œλ²•λ₯ μ‹¬νŒ μ œμ²­μ„ μ‹ μ²­ν–ˆλ‹€.

κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ μž¬νŒλΆ€λŠ” μ§€λ‚œλ‹¬ λ‚΄λž€ 사건 μž¬νŒμ— 톡일성과 전문성이 ν•„μš”ν•˜κ³  이λ₯Ό νŠΉμ • μž¬νŒλΆ€κ°€ μ „λ‹΄ν•˜λ„λ‘ μ •ν•œ νŠΉλ‘€λ²•μ€ μž…λ²•λΆ€μ˜ μž¬λŸ‰λ²”μœ„ 내에 μžˆλ‹€λ©° κΉ€ μ „ μž₯κ΄€ μΈ‘ 신청을 κΈ°κ°Β·κ°ν•˜ν–ˆλ‹€.

μœ„ν—Œλ²•λ₯ μ‹¬νŒ μ œμ²­μ΄λž€ 법λ₯ μ˜ μœ„ν—Œ μ—¬λΆ€κ°€ 재판의 μ „μ œκ°€ λ˜λŠ” 경우 법원이 ν—Œμž¬μ— μœ„ν—Œλ²•λ₯ μ‹¬νŒμ„ μ œμ²­ν•˜λŠ” μ œλ„λ‹€.

법원이 이λ₯Ό 받아듀이지 μ•Šμž κΉ€ μ „ μž₯κ΄€ 츑은 ν—Œμž¬μ— 직접 ν—Œλ²•μ†Œμ›μ„ λƒˆλ‹€.

μ•žμ„œ μœ€μ„μ—΄ μ „ λŒ€ν†΅λ Ή 츑이 λ‚΄λž€μ „λ‹΄μž¬νŒλΆ€λ²•μ— λŒ€ν•΄ λ‚Έ ν—Œλ²•μ†Œμ›λ„ μ „μ›μž¬νŒλΆ€μ— νšŒλΆ€λœ μƒνƒœμ—¬μ„œ κΉ€ μ „ μž₯κ΄€ 츑이 λ‚Έ ν—Œλ²•μ†Œμ› 사건과 ν•¨κ»˜ 심리될 κ°€λŠ₯성이 μžˆλ‹€.

This article was originally published by μ—°ν•©λ‰΄μŠ€.

Related Stories

Election Nullification Lawsuit Hinges on Proving 'Result Would Differ If Ballots Sufficed'
NACHRICHTAI
law

Election Nullification Lawsuit Hinges on Proving 'Result Would Differ If Ballots Sufficed'

Legal experts are closely watching the aftermath of the June 3 local elections, where ballot shortages and voting disruptions occurred. Lawsuits challenging the election results may arise if it can be proven that the outcome would have changed had sufficient ballots been available. Voters unable to vote may also pursue constitutional complaints and state compensation claims.

Negativ
12 sa ΓΆnce