Former US Olympic Canoeist Pleads Not Guilty to Damaging Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool
Auf einen Blick
- Former US Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to destruction of property charges for allegedly damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.
- Prosecutors claim over $1,000 in damage, while Hearn's attorneys argue he merely touched the water and is being used as a scapegoat for a failed renovation.
KI-generierte Zusammenfassung
Warum es wichtig ist
David Hearn, a former U.S. Olympic canoeist, is facing charges for allegedly damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool shortly after a $14 million renovation was completed.
Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.
Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.
Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.
The Trump Administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.
But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.
Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.
Norm Eisen, one of Hearn's attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a "scapegoat … for their own failures."
"It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America," he said.
Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.
This is a developing story.
Worauf zu achten ist
KI-Ausblick — Möglichkeiten, keine Fakten
Hearn's next hearing will take place on August 5th.
Sehr wahrscheinlich · Innerhalb von Monaten
Offene Fragen
- What was the extent of the damage caused by Hearn?
- Will the renovation's failure be further investigated?
- What will be the outcome of Hearn's legal proceedings?






