Stock-picking is evolving, investors are missing the real story: Devina Mehra
Auf einen Blick
- Devina Mehra of First Global stated that while stock-picking isn't over, the path to outperformance is shifting.
- She highlighted that a narrow market rally last year caused many portfolios to suffer despite rising indices, emphasizing the importance of diversification and global investing.
KI-generierte Zusammenfassung
Warum es wichtig ist
Devina Mehra, Founder & CMD of First Global, spoke at the ET Alpha Wealth Summit about changing trends in stock-picking and the importance of diversification. She noted that a narrow market rally last year led to many portfolios suffering despite rising indices.
Stock-picking isn't dead, but the path to outperformance is shifting, and most investors are misreading what's actually happening beneath the surface of the indices. That was the core argument from Devina Mehra, Founder & CMD of First Global, at the ET Alpha Wealth Summit.
The pain investors felt wasn't random
Mehra pointed to a striking statistic: in a typical market, around 40% of stocks tend to outperform. But last year was anything but typical. At one stage, only 12-15% of stocks were beating the broader market, an unusually narrow rally.
That narrowness explains a confusing pattern many investors experienced: indices climbed, yet individual portfolios bled. Mehra noted that even as headline numbers rose, the average stock actually fell, and roughly 40% of stocks dropped more than 10%. In other words, the index masked real pain happening at the stock level.
The good news, she said, is that breadth appears to be returning, with a wider range of stocks now participating in gains, a healthier setup for active stock-picking going forward.
Her core rule: Never go all-in on equity
Mehra's standing advice hasn't changed regardless of market conditions: never put 100% of a portfolio into equities, and treat equity allocation as money that shouldn't be needed for seven to eight years. Equity remains the most volatile asset class, and living through that volatility in real time always feels unprecedented, even though, statistically, it isn't.
Why diversification isn't magic, it's math
One of the most useful frameworks Mehra offered was around why diversification works at all. She compared investing to a game that mixes luck and skill, and said spreading bets across more stocks doesn't make anyone a better picker; it simply reduces the role luck plays in the outcome.
Her analogy: flip a coin 10 times and you might land on seven or even nine heads purely by chance. Flip it 100 times, and the result converges much closer to 50-50. The same logic applies to stock portfolios, a 60-65% stock-picking success rate (which she called a genuinely strong ratio) only shows up reliably in results when spread across enough positions, such as 50 stocks rather than 15.
Her blunt warning to investors: be skeptical of anyone claiming to have a formula for picking multibaggers. Diversification, done properly, isn't a guarantee of multibagger returns, it's a way to make outcomes more dependable.
Going global, long before it was trendy
On the recent boom in global investing interest, Mehra noted she began allocating overseas back in 1999, well before it became a mainstream conversation in India. She also pushed back on a common psychological bias — the tendency for most people to assume they're better than average, much like the well-documented overconfidence seen among drivers who rate their own skills unrealistically high.
The takeaway
Alpha isn't dead, but Mehra's message was clear: durable outperformance comes from disciplined asset allocation and genuine diversification, not from chasing hot picks or assuming personal skill will outrun the odds.
Offene Fragen
- Will market breadth continue to improve?
- How will global economic factors impact diversification strategies?