Newsgather
BackTrump Reportedly Abandons $1.8 Billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'
Trump Reportedly Abandons $1.8 Billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'
Dringend
The Independent World01.06.2026Politik4 dk okuma

Trump Reportedly Abandons $1.8 Billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'

Auf einen Blick

  • President Trump is reportedly abandoning plans for a $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' after federal judges blocked payments and lawmakers criticized it as a 'slush fund' for allies.
  • The fund aimed to compensate supporters allegedly targeted by government investigations.

KI-generierte Zusammenfassung

Warum es wichtig ist

President Trump reportedly plans to abandon a nearly $1.8 billion compensation fund designed to pay his allies and alleged 'victims' of government 'weaponization.' This comes after federal judges blocked payments and lawmakers criticized the fund as a 'slush fund.' The scheme was tied to Trump's tax investigations and aimed to funnel taxpayer dollars to his supporters.

Schriftgröße

President Donald Trump will reportedly abandon plans for a nearly $1.8 billion compensation fund designed to pay his allies and alleged “victims” of government “weaponization” after federal judges began firing back at a so-called “settlement” that got him off the hook for tax investigations in exchange for funneling millions of taxpayer dollars to his supporters.

A pending decision, according to Axios and Punchbowl, follows a federal court ruling that temporarily blocks the administration from funding or making any payments from what critics have called a “slush fund” to enrich the president’s aggrieved supporters.

The scheme has also come under heavy fire from members of Congress, where lawmakers abruptly abandoned a series of votes before Memorial Day after hitting an impasse over plans to funnel taxpayer dollars into the fund.

Last week, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the administration from “taking any further action pursuant to the creation or operation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund” — including transferring money to it, considering any claims, and mailing any checks while a legal challenge plays out.

Another federal judge is also investigating the so-called “settlement” agreement between the president and the IRS after Trump sued his own administration for $10 billion. The judge will determine whether Trump filed a “frivolous lawsuit for the sole purpose of forcing a settlement” to create a fund for his political allies while the president, his family and their businesses escape government scrutiny for tax debts over which they have been under investigation for more than a decade.

The fund derailed Republican plans to pass legislation to continue funding Immigration and Customs Enforcement, blowing up into a heated closed-door briefing with Senate leaders and and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who would oversee the board that controls the payouts.

Democratic members of Congress were also mulling plans to kill the fund through the upcoming budget process by forcing Republicans to go on-record with their vote for the president’s $1.776 billion reserve.

“The blatant corruption of a slush fund explicitly for insurrectionists and Trump cronies simply could not be ignored,” according to Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen, which is among the plaintiffs suing to block the fund.

“If the Trump administration drops the fund, as is now being reported, it is simply a nod to the realities of how appalling and toxic this fund truly was,” she said. “As important as taking out this disgusting policy is, we must not let it be an excuse to greenlight the massive increases to ICE funding embedded in the reconciliation bill.”

Under opaque plans for the fund, the Department of Justice would tap into a long-standing Judgment Fund to settle any claims brought against the government.

A five-member board made up of Blanche’s appointees would then arrange payments from the fund to recipients — whose identities will remain secret.

Blanche has publicly stated that Trump and his family are not eligible, but Blanche has not ruled out payments to the president’s donors and allies, raising questions about the process and who stands to benefit.

Trump fumed on Truth Social last month that he “gave up a lot of money” to create the fund, despite previously saying he would donate whatever he received from his IRS lawsuit to charity organizations.

“I could have settled my case, including the illegal release of my Tax Returns and the equally illegal BREAK IN of Mar-a-Lago, for an absolute fortune. Instead, I am helping others, who were so badly abused by an evil, corrupt, and weaponized Biden Administration, receive, at long last, JUSTICE!” Trump wrote May 22.

Days earlier, he said he wasn’t involved in the settlement.

“I guess they made a settlement of some kind. I wasn’t involved in the settlement, I could have been involved, but I didn't choose to be, so they made a settlement,” he told reporters.

Trump said the victims of “weaponization” under the Obama and Biden administrations — an apparent reference to his allies who were investigated in connection with his 2016 and 2020 campaigns and the attack on the Capitol — were “destroyed, they went to jail, their families were ruined, they committed suicide.”

“We’re reimbursing those people for their legal fees and for their costs, and for anybody involved,” he added. “It was the most violent thing I’ve ever seen in politics.”

This is a developing story

Worauf zu achten ist

KI-Ausblick — Möglichkeiten, keine Fakten

  • The Trump administration will officially announce the abandonment of the Anti-Weaponization Fund.

    Sehr wahrscheinlich · Innerhalb von Tagen

  • Legal challenges against the fund will be dismissed or resolved in favor of the plaintiffs.

    Wahrscheinlich · Innerhalb von Wochen

  • The proposed ICE funding increases embedded in the reconciliation bill will face further scrutiny or be renegotiated.

    Möglich · Innerhalb von Wochen

Offene Fragen

  • Will Trump's administration officially confirm the abandonment of the fund?
  • What are the specific legal grounds for the federal court rulings blocking the fund?
  • What will happen to the funds initially earmarked for the compensation scheme?
  • Will there be any repercussions for the individuals involved in proposing or managing the fund?

Verwandte Themen

This article was originally published by The Independent World.

Ähnliche Meldungen

Mehr zu diesem ThemaDonald Trump