Newsgather
BackUK Schools Cut Special Needs Support Amid Financial Crisis
UK Schools Cut Special Needs Support Amid Financial Crisis
Dringend
Guardian UK23.04.2026Education3 dk okumaUnited Kingdom

UK Schools Cut Special Needs Support Amid Financial Crisis

Poll reveals two-fifths of school leaders forced to reduce support for SEND pupils due to decade-long funding issues, with further cuts expected.

Auf einen Blick

  • A poll indicates that two-fifths of school leaders in England are cutting support for children with special educational needs due to a long-standing financial crisis.
  • Many are reducing teaching assistants and support staff, with further cuts anticipated.

KI-generierte Zusammenfassung

Warum es wichtig ist

A significant portion of school leaders in England are reporting cuts to support for students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) due to ongoing financial pressures. This comes as the government aims to enhance inclusivity for SEND pupils within mainstream education.

Schriftgröße

Two-fifths of school leaders in England have been forced to cut back on support for children with special educational needs due to a financial crisis “more than a decade in the making”, according to a poll.

Seven out of 10 (71%) leaders say they have cut down on teaching assistants (TAs) in the past year, while 49% have reduced support staff. The crisis could escalate as 81% warn of further cuts in the year ahead.

The Sutton Trust’s findings emerge as the government seeks to overhaul the special needs system, with plans to make mainstream schools more inclusive of pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (Send).

Experts say TAs play a vital role in supporting children with Send in mainstream education, and without them it will be impossible for the government to realise its ambitions.

Pepe Di’Iasio, the general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “This research shows the contradiction which exists between the government’s aspirations for the education system and the amount of money that it is prepared to provide to realise those aspirations.

“That contradiction is perhaps most stark in the fact that many schools are having to cut resourcing for Send support at exactly the time the government has launched a programme of major reforms which involve far more expectations on mainstream schools.

“Although the government has made some additional funding available, this is unlikely to be sufficient to support reforms on the scale envisaged or address existing funding shortages.”

The government announced a cash-terms increase of £4.7bn by the end of the spending review period, but this will have to cover an expansion of free school meals and pay rises for teachers.

The survey of 1,105 state school teachers, conducted by the National Foundation for Educational Research on behalf of the Sutton Trust, found Send cuts were particularly acute in primary schools (45% v 25% at secondary level).

Three in 10 secondary school leaders had seen cuts to subject choices in GCSEs and A-levels. Almost half (49%) reported making cuts to IT equipment, 47% to trips and outings, and 32% to sports and other extracurricular activities.

Ahead of a government consultation on the funding model for disadvantaged pupils, 86% of senior leaders said they believed the pupil premium – additional funding for children from low-income families – was not enough.

Despite overall increases in school funding, 43% of senior leaders said they were still having to use pupil premium to plug gaps elsewhere in their budget.

Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the National Education Union, said: “This is the uncomfortable reality that the government simply will not face up to. Schools are running on empty and are having to make cuts to essentials simply to survive. It is indefensible that government continues to underfund schools. It is impossible for schools to meet the government’s ambitions on Send support.”

Paul Whiteman, the general secretary at NAHT school leaders’ union, said school finances remained in a perilous state. “It is clear that much more investment is still needed to turn this situation around and to ensure schools are fully equipped to deliver on the government’s proposed reforms to the broken special educational needs system,” he said.

Nick Harrison, the Sutton Trust chief executive, said: “Schools are in a financial crisis that’s more than a decade and a half in the making, and we’re seeing the long-term results of those cuts today. With ambitious government reforms on the horizon, now is the time to target measures that will rebalance funding towards the pupils and schools that need it most.”

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “Despite deeply challenging choices about public spending, we have continued to prioritise education by putting record investment into our schools, so every child can achieve and thrive.

“In 2026-27 the core schools budget will total £67bn – an increase of £1.7bn from 2025-26 – with pupil premium funding rising to around £3.2bn and further increases planned over the next three years. This includes significant additional investment to make our Send reforms a reality.”

Worauf zu achten ist

KI-Ausblick — Möglichkeiten, keine Fakten

  • Further deterioration of SEND support services in schools if additional funding is not allocated.

    Sehr wahrscheinlich · Innerhalb von Monaten

  • Increased pressure on mainstream schools to demonstrate inclusivity for SEND pupils without adequate resources, leading to potential policy adjustments or public outcry.

    Wahrscheinlich · Innerhalb von Monaten

  • A potential increase in the use of pupil premium funds to cover core SEND support, further depleting resources for disadvantaged pupils.

    Möglich · Innerhalb von Monaten

Offene Fragen

  • What specific criteria are used to determine which support services are cut first?
  • What is the long-term impact of these cuts on the academic and social development of SEND pupils?
  • How will the government's planned reforms for SEND support be implemented without adequate funding?
  • What is the breakdown of funding allocation across different types of schools (primary vs. secondary, state vs. private)?

Verwandte Themen

This article was originally published by Guardian UK.

Ähnliche Meldungen

Mehr zu diesem Themaspecial educational needs