Eilmeldung
USTanker Hit by Projectile Off Oman, Catches FireDEFolarin Balogun äußert sich erstmals zur Kontroverse um seine SperreINSpudCell: Scientists Create First Synthetic System Mimicking Life's Full CycleCN日本7旬嬤長期照顧孫子身心俱疲 退休金恐不足RUМИД РФ: Прибалтика играет с огнем, предоставляя территории для враждебных действий против РоссииFRMarine Le Pen : le verdict est tombéFRÉquipe de France : les Bleus préparent le quart de finale dans la bonne humeurBRDois tornados causam devastação em Hubei, na China; há mortos e desaparecidosAUQantas Customers Urged to Check for Settlement Emails Amid Scam FearsVNHyundai Tucson nâng cấp lộ diện trên đường thử, dự kiến ra mắt nửa cuối 2026USTanker Hit by Projectile Off Oman, Catches FireDEFolarin Balogun äußert sich erstmals zur Kontroverse um seine SperreINSpudCell: Scientists Create First Synthetic System Mimicking Life's Full CycleCN日本7旬嬤長期照顧孫子身心俱疲 退休金恐不足RUМИД РФ: Прибалтика играет с огнем, предоставляя территории для враждебных действий против РоссииFRMarine Le Pen : le verdict est tombéFRÉquipe de France : les Bleus préparent le quart de finale dans la bonne humeurBRDois tornados causam devastação em Hubei, na China; há mortos e desaparecidosAUQantas Customers Urged to Check for Settlement Emails Amid Scam FearsVNHyundai Tucson nâng cấp lộ diện trên đường thử, dự kiến ra mắt nửa cuối 2026
Newsgather
BackUltra Electronics Pays £15m Over Failed Bribery Prevention in Algeria and Oman Contracts
Ultra Electronics Pays £15m Over Failed Bribery Prevention in Algeria and Oman Contracts
NACHRICHT
Guardian UK01.05.2026Crime3 dk okumaUnited Kingdom

Ultra Electronics Pays £15m Over Failed Bribery Prevention in Algeria and Oman Contracts

British defence company admits failing to prevent bribery linked to three public sector contracts as SFO secures deferred prosecution agreement

Auf einen Blick

  • Ultra Electronics has agreed to pay £15m after admitting failing to prevent bribery related to three public sector contracts in Algeria and Oman.
  • The SFO investigation, opened in 2018 after the company referred itself, centered on a £200m Omani deal and two Algerian contracts that were never secured.
  • The deferred prosecution agreement includes a £10m penalty plus £4.8m in investigation costs, with three years of compliance reporting required.

KI-generierte Zusammenfassung

Warum es wichtig ist

Ultra Electronics was a UK-listed defence company until acquired by Cobham in 2021. The SFO had suffered multiple high-profile case collapses including against Serco, G4S and London Mining, making this DPA a significant enforcement success.

Schriftgröße

The British defence company Ultra Electronics has accepted responsibility for failure to prevent bribery and agreed to pay £15m after an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office. The penalties are part of a deferred prosecution approved by the High Court on Friday, after an investigation opened in 2018, when the company referred itself to the UK law enforcement agency a month after corruption allegations were published by Algerian media.

Ultra agreed to pay a £10m penalty and £4.8m to cover the SFO investigation costs, after it admitted failing to prevent bribery in connection with three public sector contracts in Algeria and Oman, sought through the use of agents.

Graham McNulty, the interim director of the SFO, said: "Bribery undermines that trust and corrodes the systems on which society relies. Today's outcome underlines the Serious Fraud Office's determination to investigate and hold companies to account where those standards are breached."

The contracts in question were a £200m deal awarded by Oman's ministry of transport and communications, another for technology and e-commerce solutions at Houari Boumediene airport in Algiers, and a third for encryption technology for Algeria's ministry of post and telecommunications. The Algerian contracts – which were ultimately not secured by the company – were expected to generate a profit of £1.4m.

Ultra agreed to take steps to reform its business practices, and must provide yearly reports for the next three years to the SFO to demonstrate the effectiveness of its anti-bribery and compliance programme.

Ultimately owned by the US-based private equity group Advent International, Ultra had been listed on the London Stock Exchange until it was acquired by rival UK defence company Cobham in 2021 in a £2.6bn deal. Cobham had previously been bought by Advent in 2020.

The agreement represents a much-needed win for the SFO, which was been hit by the collapse of high profile cases against companies including Serco, G4S and London Mining. The agency is now searching for a new leader, and the last time it imposed a penalty for corporate bribery was in 2022, when it fined the mining company Glencore £281m.

"This DPA is a welcome deal to end a drought of corporate bribery successes for the SFO," said Helen Taylor, the deputy director of the nonprofit Spotlight on Corruption, which has been following the case. "Coming at a time of growing geopolitical instability and rising defence spending, this enforcement action sends an important signal to those in the defence industry tempted to cut corners to secure lucrative public contracts."

However, she decried the level of penalty, saying there was a risk defence groups would simply "factor such penalties into the cost of doing business in a high-risk, high-reward sector".

It comes three years after Ultra agreed a similar deal with public prosecutors in Canada. The 2023 remediation agreement found the company accountable for two counts of bribing officials in the Philippines, and one of defrauding the Filipino government. The offences, which took place between 2006 and 2018, related to the procurement of ballistic missile systems for the Philippine national police, and the company was ordered to pay over C$10m (£5.4m) in penalties, surcharges and forfeiture charges.

While the original 2018 SFO investigation related to Algeria, it was expanded to cover Oman in 2023. The agency said it was widening the scope further in October 2024 to include the company's worldwide operations.

The SFO said on Friday it had previously withdrawn from negotiations with Ultra after concluding "the conditions for a meaningful agreement were not in place". Negotiations only resumed after what it described as "significant changes to the company's ownership, structure and leadership".

In a statement, Ultra said it had "fully cooperated" with the investigation, and that the SFO "acknowledged Ultra's exemplary cooperation and the extensive enhancement to Ultra's compliance programme" since its acquisition. It said: "The agreement reached between Ultra and the SFO, approved today by the court, recognises Cobham Ultra's status as a model of good practice within the defence industry."

Offene Fragen

  • Why did SFO originally withdraw from negotiations?
  • What specific changes to Ultra's structure enabled negotiations to resume?

Verwandte Themen

This article was originally published by Guardian UK.

Ähnliche Meldungen

Mehr zu diesem Themaultra electronics