Eilmeldung
ESUn guardia civil mata a tiros a su expareja en el cuartel de Llanes y hiere a un teniente antes de morirESTormentas intensas en Catalunya: daños en cultivos, cortes de tráfico y ferrocarrilESPP y Vox se alinean contra el reparto de menores migrantes para evitar la ruptura en cuatro autonomíasESMarruecos y España: Una tragedia sin beneficiosESCrisis humanitaria en Ceuta: Se inician investigaciones judiciales tras la entrada masiva de migrantesESUn vendedor ambulante sobrevive al ataque de un dron ruso en un mercado de JersónESEspaña se convierte en el centro del debate político en Italia y causa colas en los aeropuertosESDetenido un boxeador afgano por el asesinato de la trabajadora humanitaria escocesa Elisabeth-Jane Ross en AtenasESEl sombrío legado de Gustavo Petro en Colombia entre corrupción y expansión criminalESSube a 80 el número de fallecidos en la crisis migratoria de Ceuta y continúan las reacciones políticasESUn guardia civil mata a tiros a su expareja en el cuartel de Llanes y hiere a un teniente antes de morirESTormentas intensas en Catalunya: daños en cultivos, cortes de tráfico y ferrocarrilESPP y Vox se alinean contra el reparto de menores migrantes para evitar la ruptura en cuatro autonomíasESMarruecos y España: Una tragedia sin beneficiosESCrisis humanitaria en Ceuta: Se inician investigaciones judiciales tras la entrada masiva de migrantesESUn vendedor ambulante sobrevive al ataque de un dron ruso en un mercado de JersónESEspaña se convierte en el centro del debate político en Italia y causa colas en los aeropuertosESDetenido un boxeador afgano por el asesinato de la trabajadora humanitaria escocesa Elisabeth-Jane Ross en AtenasESEl sombrío legado de Gustavo Petro en Colombia entre corrupción y expansión criminalESSube a 80 el número de fallecidos en la crisis migratoria de Ceuta y continúan las reacciones políticas
Newsgather
ZurückUS Administration refunds $100bn in tariffs following Supreme Court ruling
US Administration refunds $100bn in tariffs following Supreme Court ruling
NACHRICHT
Al Jazeeravor 23 StundenBusiness1 Min. Lesezeit

US Administration refunds $100bn in tariffs following Supreme Court ruling

Customs officials report returning more than three-quarters of earmarked tariff revenues after the Supreme Court struck down emergency trade duties.

Auf einen Blick

The US administration has refunded about $100bn in tariffs after the Supreme Court ruled against the use of emergency powers to impose duties, according to customs officials.

KI-generierte Zusammenfassung

Warum es wichtig ist

The US Supreme Court struck down a large portion of the president's tariff regime in a 6-3 ruling in February.

Schriftgröße

United States President Donald Trump’s administration has refunded about $100bn in tariffs since the nation’s top court ruled against its use of emergency powers to impose duties on dozens of trade partners, according to customs officials.

The Trump administration collected about $166bn from US importers before the US Supreme Court struck down a large portion of the president’s tariff regime in a 6-3 ruling in February.

In a court filing on Tuesday, the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) disclosed that it had returned more than three-quarters of $128.68bn in tariff revenues earmarked as “potential and certified refunds”.

“CBP’s financial accounting system receives updates from Treasury that indicate these CBP certified refunds are being regularly dispersed,” Brandon Lord, executive director of CBP’s Trade Policy and Programs directorate, said in the filing with the US Court of International Trade.

In its ruling, the US Supreme Court found that Trump exceeded his authority when he invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose fentanyl-related tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, and broader “reciprocal” tariffs on more than 90 countries.

Trump angrily denounced the ruling at the time, branding the six justices who sided against him “fools” and “lapdogs” for the Democratic Party.

The ruling did not nullify Trump’s tariffs on specific industries invoked under the 1962 Trade Expansion Act, leaving intact duties on goods including steel, automobiles and copper.

Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the US Court of International Trade in March ruled that companies affected by the invalidated tariffs should be refunded.

Trump has continued to roll out new tariffs since the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Last month, his administration announced levies of 10-12.5 percent on imports from dozens of countries that officials claim have not taken sufficient action to combat forced labour.

On Monday, a group of 25 US states, including New York, California, Arizona and Colorado, filed a legal challenge against the latest tariffs, calling the measures a pretext to re-impose the duties struck down in February.

Worauf zu achten ist

KI-Ausblick — Möglichkeiten, keine Fakten

  • Court evaluates legality of new forced-labour-related tariffs.

    Wahrscheinlich · Innerhalb von Monaten

Offene Fragen

  • How will ongoing legal challenges against new tariffs proceed?
  • Which specific companies will receive the largest refunds?

Verwandte Themen

This article was originally published by Al Jazeera.

Ähnliche Meldungen

Mehr zu diesem Thematariffs