Newsgather
AtrásFormer Coronation Street Actor Qasim Akhtar Wins Substantial Damages in Libel Claim Against The Sun
Former Coronation Street Actor Qasim Akhtar Wins Substantial Damages in Libel Claim Against The Sun
NOTICIA
BBC UK Newshace 1 horaLaw1 min de lecturaUnited Kingdom

Former Coronation Street Actor Qasim Akhtar Wins Substantial Damages in Libel Claim Against The Sun

En resumen

  • Former Coronation Street actor Qasim Akhtar will receive "substantial" damages and legal costs from The Sun's publisher, News Group Newspapers, to settle a High Court libel claim.
  • The newspaper falsely alleged Akhtar backed an Islamic cleric, was linked to extremism, and trained with guns in Pakistan.

Resumen generado por IA

Por qué importa

Former Coronation Street actor Qasim Akhtar sued The Sun's publisher for libel over false allegations linking him to extremism and gun training in Pakistan. The newspaper apologized "unreservedly" for the harm caused.

Tamaño de fuente

Former Coronation Street actor Qasim Akhtar is to receive "substantial" damages from the Sun's publisher, to settle a High Court libel claim.

Akhtar who played Zeedan Nazir in the ITV soap from 2014 to 2018 and then 2021 to 2023, sued News Group Newspapers (NGN) earlier this year.

A story in the Sun had falsely alleged Akhtar had "backed" and "teamed up with" Islamic cleric Uthman ibn Farooq, was associated with extremism, radicalisation and violence, and had "moved to Pakistan" and "trained with guns".

The newspaper previously apologised "unreservedly" to the actor for the "serious harm and distress caused to him by the publication of these false allegations".

The story, published in November, appeared in The Sun online and in print.

The Manchester-born actor, who has previously appeared in TV shows including Shameless and Waterloo Road, did not attend the court proceedings.

But his lawyer, Daniel Taylor, read out an agreed statement, saying NGN had agreed to pay "substantial damages" and Akhtar's legal costs.

"The defendant has accepted that the publication of the article caused serious harm to Mr Akhtar's reputation and also caused him great distress," he said.

"This included reputational harm to his family life and business, which he was forced to put on hold pending the matter being resolved.

"The libel was compounded by the fact that the defendant has acknowledged that it failed to obtain Mr Akhtar's response to these very serious allegations prior to publication."

Preguntas abiertas

  • What was the exact amount of "substantial" damages?
  • What was The Sun's source for the false allegations?
  • What specific business ventures were put on hold?

Temas relacionados

This article was originally published by BBC UK News.

Noticias relacionadas

Más sobre este temaqasim akhtar