Última hora
RUВенгерский парламент пригрозил импичментом президенту из-за отказа подписать поправку к конституцииITSam Neill, attore di Jurassic Park, è morto a 78 anniINTLUkraine War: EU discusses sanctions, 'Coalition of the Willing' meets in ParisRUВ России подготовят около 600 экспертов для наблюдения за выборамиTRSüleyman Soylu anlattı: 15 Temmuz gecesi neler yaşandı?CN广东探索“产教评”技能生态链:三小时速成一线技工,助力稳就业RUБывшего гендиректора "Торпедо" Скородумова осудили за подкуп арбитровTRİzmir'de Deprem Hazırlıkları: Karşıyaka'da Saha Çalışmaları TamamlandıRUУполномоченный по правам ребенка: 11-летний умерший в больнице Севастополя ребенок имел паллиативный диагноз с рожденияRUЖители Омской области привлечены к ответственности за съемку атаки дронов на НПЗRUВенгерский парламент пригрозил импичментом президенту из-за отказа подписать поправку к конституцииITSam Neill, attore di Jurassic Park, è morto a 78 anniINTLUkraine War: EU discusses sanctions, 'Coalition of the Willing' meets in ParisRUВ России подготовят около 600 экспертов для наблюдения за выборамиTRSüleyman Soylu anlattı: 15 Temmuz gecesi neler yaşandı?CN广东探索“产教评”技能生态链:三小时速成一线技工,助力稳就业RUБывшего гендиректора "Торпедо" Скородумова осудили за подкуп арбитровTRİzmir'de Deprem Hazırlıkları: Karşıyaka'da Saha Çalışmaları TamamlandıRUУполномоченный по правам ребенка: 11-летний умерший в больнице Севастополя ребенок имел паллиативный диагноз с рожденияRUЖители Омской области привлечены к ответственности за съемку атаки дронов на НПЗ
Newsgather
BackHong Kong court orders confiscation of HK$674,000 in terrorism trial
Hong Kong court orders confiscation of HK$674,000 in terrorism trial
NOTICIA
SCMP Economy18.05.2026Crime2 dk okumaChina

Hong Kong court orders confiscation of HK$674,000 in terrorism trial

En resumen

  • A Hong Kong court has ordered the confiscation of over HK$674,000 (US$86,065) seized from three defendants in a terrorism trial.
  • The funds were gathered by the "Dragon Slaying Brigade" to support a plot to kill police during the 2019 anti-government protests.

Resumen generado por IA

Por qué importa

A Hong Kong court has ordered the confiscation of funds seized from defendants in a terrorism trial. The money was gathered to support a plot to kill police during the 2019 anti-government protests. This is the first such order under the United Nations (Anti-Terrorism Measures) Ordinance since its 2002 enactment.

Tamaño de fuente

A Hong Kong court has ordered the confiscation of more than HK$674,000 (US$86,065) seized from three defendants in a landmark terrorism trial, finding the funds were gathered to support a plot to kill police during the 2019 anti-government protests.

The High Court on Monday declared the money raised by the “Dragon Slaying Brigade” constituted terrorist property under the United Nations (Anti-Terrorism Measures) Ordinance, the first such order since the law came into effect in 2002.

Team leader Wong Chun-keung, mastermind Ng Chi-hung, and co-defendant Lau Pui-ying, who was among six people acquitted at trial, did not object and were absent from the hearing.

The order was made 1½ years after the court handed down jail sentences to seven of 14 defendants prosecuted over the plan to murder police officers during a mass demonstration on December 8, 2019.

Under the plan, the conspirators would vandalise shops seen as pro-government to draw police onto the street, before detonating a bomb packed with 2kg of explosives near a petrol station on Hennessy Road in Wan Chai.

A sniper would then ambush retreating officers while another would set off a larger bomb containing 8kg of explosives and 150 nails. The objective was to steal officers’ handguns in preparation for further conflicts with authorities.

A financial investigation found the conspirators had raised more than HK$4 million through various channels, with HK$2.27 million gathered after opening a Telegram channel called “Dragonteam2019” on November 6, 2019.

Preguntas abiertas

  • What will happen to the confiscated funds?
  • Are there any other individuals involved in the plot who have not yet been identified or prosecuted?
  • What are the broader implications of this ruling for future anti-terrorism measures in Hong Kong?

Temas relacionados

This article was originally published by SCMP Economy.

Noticias relacionadas

Más sobre este tematerrorism