Última hora
ITPreso il telefonista delle truffe agli anziani, latitante dal giugno del 2025TRSK Group Başkanı Chey Tae-won'un Boşanma Davasında 1 Milyar Dolarlık Tazminat RiskiDEMerz baut Bundesregierung und Parteiführung um: Überblick über die PersonalrochadeITDonna in shock anafilattico per punture di calabroni salvata a Forni AvoltriDEJürgen Klopp unterschreibt als Bundestrainer des DFB bis 2030UKBAE Systems CEO warns UK 'too complacent' about foreign attack riskFRRosalía face à une polémique en Argentine après un partage controverséTRBakanlık, Listeria Bakterisi Tespit Edilen Peynir Ürününü Toplattı ve Ceza KestiCN曾國城談「曾拌麵」毒油風波:盼相關單位嚴格把關CN野火肆虐歐洲多地 法國向歐盟求援西班牙馬德里緊急狀態ITPreso il telefonista delle truffe agli anziani, latitante dal giugno del 2025TRSK Group Başkanı Chey Tae-won'un Boşanma Davasında 1 Milyar Dolarlık Tazminat RiskiDEMerz baut Bundesregierung und Parteiführung um: Überblick über die PersonalrochadeITDonna in shock anafilattico per punture di calabroni salvata a Forni AvoltriDEJürgen Klopp unterschreibt als Bundestrainer des DFB bis 2030UKBAE Systems CEO warns UK 'too complacent' about foreign attack riskFRRosalía face à une polémique en Argentine après un partage controverséTRBakanlık, Listeria Bakterisi Tespit Edilen Peynir Ürününü Toplattı ve Ceza KestiCN曾國城談「曾拌麵」毒油風波:盼相關單位嚴格把關CN野火肆虐歐洲多地 法國向歐盟求援西班牙馬德里緊急狀態
Newsgather
AtrásSupreme Court Hears Muslim Side's Plea on Bhojshala Namaz Site Dispute
Supreme Court Hears Muslim Side's Plea on Bhojshala Namaz Site Dispute
En desarrollo
Times of Indiahace 2 horasLaw1 min de lecturaIndia

Supreme Court Hears Muslim Side's Plea on Bhojshala Namaz Site Dispute

En resumen

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear the Muslim side's plea on July 29, alleging the Madhya Pradesh government failed to provide an adjacent site for Friday namaz near the disputed Bhojshala complex in Dhar, contrary to earlier court directions.

Resumen generado por IA

Por qué importa

The Bhojshala complex in Dhar is a disputed monument claimed by Hindus as a temple and Muslims as a mosque. The Supreme Court had ordered the state to provide an adjacent site for Friday prayers.

Tamaño de fuente

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear the Muslim side's plea on July 29 after it alleged that the Madhya Pradesh government had failed to provide an adjacent or nearby site for offering Friday namaz near the disputed Bhojshala complex in Dhar. It said that the allocated site was too far from the disputed site. During the hearing, counsel appearing for the Muslim side told the court that the alternate prayer site was not being allocated in accordance with its earlier directions. The authorities are "allocating a site adjacent or near the place. Two Fridays prayers already missed. The (allocated) site is 1.3 km away", PTI reported quoting senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi saying. Responding to this, solicitor general Tushar Mehta said that it was "900m away". "We don't have helicopters... by road it is 1.3 km. There is an attempt to always not follow orders of this court," Ahmadi said. The submission comes days after the Supreme Court directed the state government to identify a separate open space adjacent to the disputed Bhojshala complex where Muslims could offer Friday prayers between 1pm and 3pm until the case is finally decided. The interim arrangement was ordered on July 14 while the court was hearing appeals against the Madhya Pradesh high court's ruling that declared the Bhojshala complex a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati. The Bhojshala dispute centres on a protected monument in Dhar claimed by Hindus as a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati and by Muslims as the Kamal Maula Mosque.

Qué observar

Perspectiva de IA — posibilidades, no hechos

  • The Supreme Court will hear the Muslim side's plea regarding the namaz site on July 29.

    Muy probable · En días

Preguntas abiertas

  • Will the Madhya Pradesh government provide an adjacent site for namaz?
  • How will the Supreme Court rule on the alleged non-compliance?

Temas relacionados

This article was originally published by Times of India.

Noticias relacionadas

Más sobre este temasupreme court