Última hora
BRPrefeito de Viamão admite falha do município em caso de missionário que espancou filhoARربع النهائي: 8 منتخبات تتنافس على 4 مقاعد في نصف النهائيRUСпикер парламента Ирана: Ормузский пролив будет открыт на иранских условияхRUВ Индонезии крокодил утащил рыбака под воду во время починки суднаEUAndy Burnham's Approach to the US Relationship: A Cooler Path Ahead?RUЕвропа пережила самый жаркий июнь в истории из-за изменения климатаAUIran Rakes in Billions Despite US Sanctions and Strait of Hormuz StrikesKRSouth Korea Issues Record 1.7 Billion Euro FX Stabilization BondsCN矢板明夫在台中遭襲 民進黨指中共跨國鎮壓具體化CN《中華民族團結促進法》:中共極權擴張與國家恐怖主義的工具BRPrefeito de Viamão admite falha do município em caso de missionário que espancou filhoARربع النهائي: 8 منتخبات تتنافس على 4 مقاعد في نصف النهائيRUСпикер парламента Ирана: Ормузский пролив будет открыт на иранских условияхRUВ Индонезии крокодил утащил рыбака под воду во время починки суднаEUAndy Burnham's Approach to the US Relationship: A Cooler Path Ahead?RUЕвропа пережила самый жаркий июнь в истории из-за изменения климатаAUIran Rakes in Billions Despite US Sanctions and Strait of Hormuz StrikesKRSouth Korea Issues Record 1.7 Billion Euro FX Stabilization BondsCN矢板明夫在台中遭襲 民進黨指中共跨國鎮壓具體化CN《中華民族團結促進法》:中共極權擴張與國家恐怖主義的工具
Newsgather
BackSupreme Court Modifies Order on Academics in NCERT Textbook Dispute
Supreme Court Modifies Order on Academics in NCERT Textbook Dispute
NOTICIA
Economic Times22.05.2026Law2 dk okumaIndia

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Academics in NCERT Textbook Dispute

En resumen

  • The Supreme Court modified its March 11 order concerning three academics involved in an NCERT textbook dispute.
  • The court clarified that the Centre and states can independently decide on engaging with the academics and withdrew earlier observations against them.

Resumen generado por IA

Por qué importa

The Supreme Court had previously ordered the Centre and states to disassociate from three academics involved in drafting an NCERT textbook chapter on judicial corruption. The court had also banned further publication of the chapter and made observations against the academics.

Tamaño de fuente

The Supreme Court on Friday modified its March 11 order that had directed the Centre, states and others to disassociate from three academics, following a row over an NCERT book chapter containing "offending" contents on corruption in the judiciary.

The apex court left it open to the Centre, states, Union territories, public universities and institutions that receive funds from the central or state governments to take an independent decision on the issue, without being influenced by its observations made in the March 11 order.

A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi also recalled the part of the March 11 order that had recorded that the three academics -- Professor Michel Danino, Suparna Diwakar and Alok Prasanna Kumar -- had "deliberately and knowingly misrepresented the facts" in order to project a negative image of the Indian judiciary to the students of Class 8.

The bench passed the order while hearing a plea moved by the three academics who explained their stand, saying no individual had the sole say in the drafting of the content and it was a collective process.

The court also observed that its comments were made in context of the contents and not the individuals.

On March 11, acting tough against the three experts involved in the drafting of the controversial chapter in the National Council of Educational Research and Training's (NCERT) social science book for Class 8, the court had directed the Centre and all states to disassociate from them.

It had directed the Centre to form a committee of domain experts within a week for the purpose of finalising the curriculum of the NCERT's legal studies for not only Class 8 but higher classes as well.

The bench was hearing a suo-motu (initiated on its own) case titled "In Re: Social Science textbook for Grade-8 (part-2) published by NCERT and ancillary issues".

The court was informed that the chapter was drafted by the textbook development team under Danino's chairmanship and consisting of members Diwakar and Kumar.

On February 26, the apex court imposed a "blanket ban" on any further publication, reprinting or digital dissemination of the NCERT's Class-8 social science textbook that contained the "offending" contents on corruption in the judiciary, saying they have fired a gunshot and the judiciary is "bleeding".

Preguntas abiertas

  • Will the Centre or state governments decide to engage with the academics?
  • What will be the future of the controversial NCERT textbook chapter?
  • Will there be further legal challenges or reviews related to the textbook content or academic freedom?

Temas relacionados

This article was originally published by Economic Times.

Noticias relacionadas

Más sobre este temaSupreme Court