Última hora
ITIran, colpito sito a Bushehr. Trump chiama Netanyahu per coordinare prossime mosseBRCasal de idosos é amarrado, agredido e roubado em assalto a residência no ESRUВся Херсонская область обесточенаDEFußball-WM 2026: Alle Infos und HintergründeBRPolícia apreende quase 1 tonelada de drogas em veículo no interior do AM; duas pessoas são presasUKReform UK's Financial Scrutiny Echoes Trumpian TacticsITEurogruppo, scetticismo sui bond europei proposti dalla SpagnaINTLCanadian PM Mark Carney Visits Saudi Arabia to Deepen Mining and Energy TiesRUЭнди Бёрнем пригрозил Израилю новыми санкциями из-за поселений и нарушений перемирияTRMetsola ve Miçotakis'ten AB ve Güvenlik DeğerlendirmesiITIran, colpito sito a Bushehr. Trump chiama Netanyahu per coordinare prossime mosseBRCasal de idosos é amarrado, agredido e roubado em assalto a residência no ESRUВся Херсонская область обесточенаDEFußball-WM 2026: Alle Infos und HintergründeBRPolícia apreende quase 1 tonelada de drogas em veículo no interior do AM; duas pessoas são presasUKReform UK's Financial Scrutiny Echoes Trumpian TacticsITEurogruppo, scetticismo sui bond europei proposti dalla SpagnaINTLCanadian PM Mark Carney Visits Saudi Arabia to Deepen Mining and Energy TiesRUЭнди Бёрнем пригрозил Израилю новыми санкциями из-за поселений и нарушений перемирияTRMetsola ve Miçotakis'ten AB ve Güvenlik Değerlendirmesi
Newsgather
BackSupreme Court sets aside order rejecting IPS officer's voluntary retirement plea
Supreme Court sets aside order rejecting IPS officer's voluntary retirement plea
NOTICIA
Times of India02.06.2026Law1 dk okumaIndia

Supreme Court sets aside order rejecting IPS officer's voluntary retirement plea

En resumen

  • The Supreme Court has set aside a home ministry order rejecting the voluntary retirement request of Maharashtra cadre IPS officer Abdur Rahman.
  • The court directed the Centre to re-examine Rahman's plea within three months, considering subsequent chargesheets and the inability to conclude disciplinary proceedings.

Resumen generado por IA

Por qué importa

Maharashtra cadre IPS officer Abdur Rahman sought voluntary retirement but his request was rejected by the Home Ministry due to various charges against him. He approached the judiciary after his request was not accepted.

Tamaño de fuente

Supreme Court has set aside a home ministry order rejecting the voluntary retirement request of Maharashtra cadre IPS officer Abdur Rahman, who faced various charges, including torturing a person in 2014, contracting a second marriage without the consent of his first wife in 2016 and giving a speech in violation of rules in 2019. The officer had tendered a notice in Aug 2019 for VRS under Rule 16(2A) of All India Service (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, but it was not accepted, following which he approached the judiciary. Allowing his plea, a bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Alok Aradhe directed Centre to examine Rahman’s request for VRS afresh and make a decision in three months. Noting that state govt had subsequently filed a chargesheet in three cases, including in 2022 for his participation in CAA protest, SC asked Centre to also consider these cases. “In view of above discussion and analysis, we are of the opinion that central govt has not examined the complaints in detail before taking the decision dated Oct 25, 2019 of not accepting notice for VRS. Further, in view of the subsequent developments where chargesheets were issued but the state govt has been unable to conclude the disciplinary proceedings, the central govt must revisit its decision dated Oct 25, 2019, and examine the notice for voluntary retirement afresh,” the bench said.

Qué observar

Perspectiva de IA — posibilidades, no hechos

  • The Central government will re-examine Abdur Rahman's voluntary retirement request.

    Muy probable · En meses

  • A decision on Rahman's VRS will be made within three months.

    Muy probable · En meses

Preguntas abiertas

  • Will the Centre accept Rahman's VRS request upon re-examination?
  • What will be the outcome of the ongoing disciplinary proceedings?
  • What were the specific details of the charges against Rahman that led to the initial rejection?

Temas relacionados

This article was originally published by Times of India.

Noticias relacionadas

Más sobre este temaSupreme Court