Última hora
CN巴威颱風來襲!台中山區恐有「非常恐怖」雨量 盧秀燕指示4區1274保全戶預防性撤離RUСупертайфун Бави надвигается на Тайвань, власти закрывают школы и офисыCN中度颱風巴威逼近台灣 北海岸恐現毀滅性強風TRTayvan'da "Bavi" Tayfunu Hazırlıkları: Okullar Tatil, Halk Stok YapıyorPLTragiczny pożar lasu w Hiszpanii: 12 ofiar śmiertelnychCN賴清德視察中央災害應變中心 指示嚴防巴威颱風RUФрагменты беспилотников упали в Краснодарском крае, пострадавших нетARأمريكا تمنع لقاء مسؤولين من نيويورك مع السفير الإيراني بالأمم المتحدةCN第24届中国国际人才交流大会在雄安开幕 外籍专家共商创新发展CN廣西洪災無人機「吊人」救援引熱議,官媒:人民大於原則CN巴威颱風來襲!台中山區恐有「非常恐怖」雨量 盧秀燕指示4區1274保全戶預防性撤離RUСупертайфун Бави надвигается на Тайвань, власти закрывают школы и офисыCN中度颱風巴威逼近台灣 北海岸恐現毀滅性強風TRTayvan'da "Bavi" Tayfunu Hazırlıkları: Okullar Tatil, Halk Stok YapıyorPLTragiczny pożar lasu w Hiszpanii: 12 ofiar śmiertelnychCN賴清德視察中央災害應變中心 指示嚴防巴威颱風RUФрагменты беспилотников упали в Краснодарском крае, пострадавших нетARأمريكا تمنع لقاء مسؤولين من نيويورك مع السفير الإيراني بالأمم المتحدةCN第24届中国国际人才交流大会在雄安开幕 外籍专家共商创新发展CN廣西洪災無人機「吊人」救援引熱議,官媒:人民大於原則
Newsgather
BackUS Judge Blocks Trump Administration Subpoenas Against Minnesota Officials
US Judge Blocks Trump Administration Subpoenas Against Minnesota Officials
En desarrollo
Al Jazeera22.06.2026Política2 dk okuma

US Judge Blocks Trump Administration Subpoenas Against Minnesota Officials

En resumen

A US federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's subpoenas against Minnesota state officials, ruling the investigation was politically motivated and aimed to coerce assistance with immigration law enforcement.

Resumen generado por IA

Por qué importa

A US federal judge blocked the Trump administration's subpoenas against Minnesota officials, which were part of an investigation into opposition to mass deportation raids.

Tamaño de fuente

A United States judge has blocked efforts by the administration of US President Donald Trump to subpoena Democratic state officials in the Midwestern state of Minnesota, a setback for the government’s efforts to investigate officials who voiced opposition to the government’s mass deportation raids.

US District Judge Patrick Schiltz quashed subpoenas issued against officials such as Governor Tim Walz, part of a Department of Justice (DOJ) probe launched during the height of the crackdown, in a ruling on Monday.

“The Court finds that the dominant purpose of the challenged subpoenas is to coerce Minnesota officials into assisting the federal government with enforcing civil immigration law and to harass and retaliate against them for failing to do so,” Schiltz wrote in his decision. The order was issued on June 17 and unsealed on Monday.

The Trump administration has faced persistent criticism that it is using threats of prosecutions and investigations to target perceived political enemies and domestic opponents.

The subpoenas, issued against six state officials, sought broad information regarding whether their opposition to the administration’s raids constituted an effort to impede federal authorities. The Trump administration recently announced charges against 15 Minnesota activists who were members of an organisation that opposed the raids, citing a directive to “counter domestic terrorism and organised political violence”.

Those raids sparked widespread protests in the state, especially in the aftermath of the fatal shooting of two US citizens by federal agents. State officials decried the raids as a power grab and an effort to intimidate cities seen as centres of resistance to the administration.

Walz, a Democrat who served as the vice presidential candidate for Kamala Harris in the 2024 US presidential election and a frequent target of Trump’s ire, welcomed the ruling in a statement on Monday.

“Today’s ruling is a victory for the rule of law and our democracy. A federal district judge found that the US Department of Justice’s investigation into me and other Minnesota elected officials was politically motivated, unconstitutional, and meritless,” Walz said in a statement shared on social media.

“I will never stop exercising my constitutional rights to stand up for Minnesotans and the American freedoms we hold dear.”

Preguntas abiertas

  • Will the DOJ appeal the ruling?
  • What are the implications for future federal-state cooperation on immigration?
  • Will similar investigations be pursued in other states?

Temas relacionados

This article was originally published by Al Jazeera.

Noticias relacionadas

Más sobre este temaDonald Trump