The Delhi High Court declined a PIL seeking an NIA or CBI probe into the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led 'Chalo Sansad' march over the NEET paper leak, stating authorities are competent. This decision comes as the Centre continues talks with CJP regarding their demands.
The Delhi High Court initiated a suo motu PIL to oversee the Supreme Court's directions on stray dog management in the national capital. It issued notices to the Delhi and Union governments and MCD, seeking a status report by July 31, citing public trouble and dog bite incidents.
Union ministers JP Nadda and Dr Jitendra Singh visited activist Sonam Wangchuk at Medanta Hospital in Gurugram to inquire about his health. This followed a Delhi High Court order for his immediate transfer from Safdarjung Hospital due to his prolonged hunger strike over the alleged NEET paper leak, with protests continuing.
The Delhi High Court ordered the immediate transfer of activist Sonam Wangchuk from Safdarjung Hospital to Medanta Hospital in Gurugram. This decision comes as Wangchuk continues a prolonged hunger strike, now on its 24th day, protesting the NEET paper leak and demanding the Education Minister's resignation.
The Delhi High Court ordered climate activist Sonam Wangchuk's immediate transfer from Safdarjung to Medanta Hospital for treatment. His wife, Gitanjali J Angmo, had petitioned the court, alleging illegal detention after Wangchuk began a hunger strike over NEET paper leaks.
The Delhi High Court ruled that climate activist Sonam Wangchuk will continue treatment at Safdarjung Hospital, declining his wife's plea for transfer to a private facility. The court found his initial transfer to the government hospital was not arbitrary, citing his deteriorating health during a hunger strike and an earlier court order for medical monitoring. The next hearing is scheduled for July 24.
The Delhi High Court division bench denied Google's request to stay a judgment finding it liable for trademark infringement against Hindware. The court noted potential confusion from displaying competitor websites and scheduled Google's appeal for July 24.
Actor Rajpal Yadav has been sentenced to three months in jail for each of seven cheque bounce cases related to a Rs 9 crore debt. The Delhi High Court also ordered him to pay Rs 1.05 crore per case to the complainant and Rs 25,000 to the State. His wife, Radha Yadav, must pay over Rs 5 crore per case.
The Delhi High Court has upheld Bollywood actor Rajpal Yadav's conviction in multiple cheque bounce cases, sentencing him to three months imprisonment. The ruling stems from a loan taken over 15 years ago for a film, with the actor failing to meet settlement terms despite depositing some funds.
The Delhi High Court has upheld Bollywood actor Rajpal Yadav's conviction in multiple cheque bounce cases, sentencing him to 3 months imprisonment. The court dismissed his petitions challenging the trial court's judgment, noting his payment of approximately Rs 4.25 crore to the complainant.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Zostel's ninth judicial petition against PRISM (Oyo's parent company) on July 8. The court had previously set aside an arbitral award favoring Zostel, ruling the term sheet non-binding. PRISM has completed its IPO disclosures.
The Delhi High Court will deliver its verdict on Friday in petitions filed by actor Rajpal Yadav challenging his conviction and sentence in cheque bounce cases. Settlement efforts, including a proposed Rs 6 crore settlement, failed, with the court noting inconsistencies in Yadav's submissions.
The Delhi High Court has adjourned the hearing on Salman Khan's plea to stop the release of the film 'Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy'. The case, which alleges violation of personality rights, will now be heard on Friday due to a shortage of time.
The Delhi High Court is hearing a suit by cricketer Abhishek Sharma seeking protection against unauthorized use of his image, including AI-generated content. The court noted the overlap between personality rights and defamation in the digital age, particularly concerning AI-altered images.
The Delhi High Court has ordered the restoration of the X (formerly Twitter) account for the satirical platform Cockroach Janta Party (CJP). This decision overturns the Centre's earlier blocking order, which was deemed unsustainable after a court-directed review. The court noted that specific posts could have been removed instead of blocking the entire account.
The Delhi High Court closed Vinesh Phogat's petition challenging her exclusion from Asian Games trials as infructuous, as she was allowed to participate. The court directed the Wrestling Federation of India to decide her pending show-cause notice within two weeks, ensuring a personal hearing.
The Delhi High Court has directed the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) to decide within two weeks on a show-cause notice issued to wrestler Vinesh Phogat regarding indiscipline and alleged anti-doping rule violations. The court noted that Phogat's grievance regarding Asian Games selection trials was resolved, but broader selection policy challenges would require a fresh petition.
The Delhi High Court ruled that families of drivers dying in borrowed vehicles cannot claim personal accident cover from the owner's insurer via the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). Such claims are contractual, not based on negligence, and fall outside MACT's jurisdiction.
The Delhi High Court has issued a notice to the Centre regarding pleas challenging eviction proceedings against the Delhi Gymkhana Club. Members and staff are contesting the Land and Development Office's order to vacate the Lutyens' Delhi premises, citing vague grounds for eviction.
The Delhi High Court ruled that a family cannot claim compensation from a car owner's personal accident insurance via MACT if the borrower dies driving the vehicle, especially under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, which requires proving negligence.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions from two CRPF inspectors denied promotion to Assistant Commandant due to tattoos on their right forearms. The court ruled that serving personnel cannot claim ignorance of guidelines and that removing tattoos post-examination does not rectify prior ineligibility.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions from two CRPF inspectors denied promotion due to tattoos on their right forearms. The court upheld rules restricting tattoos to the left forearm and specific sizes, stating the candidates were rightly deemed ineligible.
The Delhi High Court declined to initiate contempt proceedings against a husband and his lawyers for filing the wife's unredacted intimate photographs with a divorce petition. The court termed the act a "grave lapse" but found no proof of willful violation of a 2015 judgment requiring sealed covers for sensitive material.
The Delhi High Court ruled that animal custody disputes should not be treated as property matters, prioritizing the welfare and emotional well-being of animals. Three rescued dogs were returned to their adoptive owners.
