A Himachal Pradesh consumer commission ordered Reliance JioFiber to pay Rs 10,000 compensation to a Shimla woman for unresolved internet service disruptions despite multiple complaints, citing deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.
A Himachal Pradesh consumer commission has ordered Paytm to refund a cancelled flight ticket amount of Rs 6,437, along with Rs 10,000 compensation and Rs 5,000 in legal costs, to a customer. Paytm was found liable for "deficiency in service" for failing to ensure the refund reached the customer, despite the airline transferring the money to Paytm.
A Himachal Pradesh consumer commission ordered a Greater Noida hostel to refund Rs 30,000 to an engineering student. The hostel failed to provide promised AC rooms, good food, and Wi-Fi, leading the student to leave after a week. The commission awarded interest, compensation, and litigation costs.
A consumer commission in Haridwar has ordered an online footwear retailer to refund Rs 3,606 for two defective pairs of shoes. The company must also pay Rs 15,000 in compensation and litigation costs, ruling that refusal to refund constituted a deficiency in service.
A Srinagar consumer commission ordered SpiceJet to pay Rs 62,078 to a couple denied boarding for a Haj return flight despite valid passes. The airline was found liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.
A Srinagar consumer commission has ordered SpiceJet to pay Rs 62,078 to a couple who were denied boarding on their return Haj flight despite having valid passes. The airline was found liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.
Maharashtra State Consumer Commission orders Skoda Auto India and its Mumbai dealer to pay Rs 3.25 lakh to a customer for a 58-day delay in repairing a 5-month-old Skoda Superb due to supply chain issues.
A consumer commission in Rohtak, Haryana, has ordered footwear brand Red Tape to refund Rs 10 for a carry bag and pay Rs 8,000 in compensation and litigation costs. The commission ruled that charging for the bag constituted a deficiency in service and an unfair trade practice.
A Thiruvananthapuram restaurant was ordered to pay Rs 50,000 to a customer for ruining his daughter's first birthday party with stale food and poor service. The district consumer commission found the restaurant deficient in service and held the manager and managing director jointly liable.
A consumer commission has ordered FirstCry to pay Rs 50,000 compensation and refund Rs 2,130 with interest to a customer. The retailer cancelled an order, withheld payment, and internally labeled the user as 'fraud' without due process.
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh, ordered EPFO to pay ₹50,000 compensation to Rajesh Garg for a nearly 10-year delay in transferring his provident fund (PF) accumulations, citing 'deficiency in service and unfair trade practice'.
