Audit Commission: Hong Kong Fire Services Dept yet to prosecute 34 mini-storage safety violation cases
None of 249 industrial buildings have complied with fire safety improvement orders issued under 2020 law; 129 mini-storage facilities still have outstanding hazard notices
L'essentiel
- The Audit Commission revealed that Hong Kong's Fire Services Department has not launched prosecutions in 34 cases involving mini-storage premises that failed to comply with safety hazard orders, including cases dating back to 2016 inspections.
- None of the 249 industrial buildings required to improve fire safety measures have complied with orders under a 2020 law.
- The findings come after a deadly blaze at Ngau Tau Kok in June 2016 killed two firefighters and took 108 hours to extinguish, prompting citywide inspections of mini-storage facilities.
Résumé généré par IA
Pourquoi c'est important
The 2016 Ngau Tau Kok blaze that killed two firefighters prompted authorities to inspect mini-storage facilities across Hong Kong. The tragedy led to the 2020 law requiring industrial buildings to improve fire safety measures in common areas.
Hong Kong's Fire Services Department has yet to launch prosecutions in 34 cases involving mini-storage premises that failed to comply with safety hazard orders, including sites first inspected as far back as 2016, the Audit Commission has said. The commission also revealed on Wednesday that none of the 249 industrial buildings required to improve fire safety measures in their common parts had complied with the orders issued under a law that took effect in 2020. Fire safety at industrial buildings came under public scrutiny after a blaze at a premises in Ngau Tau Kok took 108 hours to tame and killed two firefighters in June 2016, prompting authorities to inspect mini-storage facilities across the city. A report from the commission said that 724 targeted mini-storage facilities, which have clusters of lockers or cubicles allowing the public to store their belongings, were still in operation as of last June, with 129 still having outstanding fire hazard abatement notices and fire hazard orders. Others had either complied with them or had not received any orders by that period. Among the 129 premises, operators of 92 of the facilities were convicted. While three cases were in the process of prosecution, the department had yet to begin any such proceedings in the remaining 34 cases.
Questions ouvertes
- Why have 34 cases not been prosecuted despite years of non-compliance?
- What enforcement resources does the Fire Services Department have?
- What specific fire hazards remain at the 129 outstanding premises?






