Dernière minute
TRXiaomi 18 Pro Eylül'de Tanıtılıyor: İşte Tüm DetaylarPLMyśliwiec F-16 lądował awaryjnie na greckiej wyspie ZakintosARعون: أمريكا الطرف الوحيد القادر على الضغط على إسرائيل لمنع استهداف لبنانPLBracia zatrzymani za oszustwa na seniorach w Małopolsce i na ŚląskuRUНад Херсонской областью уничтожено 11 вражеских беспилотниковCN伯恩渴望盯防哈蘭德:過往交手僅讓他進1球TRYeni Air Force One'ın Güvenlik Donanımı Tartışma YarattıDEDeutschland ist Europameister im Softdrink-KonsumRUИзраиль готов помочь США в ударах по ИрануINWeak Monsoon Risks India's Rural Economy, S&P Global Ratings WarnsTRXiaomi 18 Pro Eylül'de Tanıtılıyor: İşte Tüm DetaylarPLMyśliwiec F-16 lądował awaryjnie na greckiej wyspie ZakintosARعون: أمريكا الطرف الوحيد القادر على الضغط على إسرائيل لمنع استهداف لبنانPLBracia zatrzymani za oszustwa na seniorach w Małopolsce i na ŚląskuRUНад Херсонской областью уничтожено 11 вражеских беспилотниковCN伯恩渴望盯防哈蘭德:過往交手僅讓他進1球TRYeni Air Force One'ın Güvenlik Donanımı Tartışma YarattıDEDeutschland ist Europameister im Softdrink-KonsumRUИзраиль готов помочь США в ударах по ИрануINWeak Monsoon Risks India's Rural Economy, S&P Global Ratings Warns
Newsgather
BackDigital Chamber Files Brief Against Ownership Claim of Dormant Bitcoin Addresses
Digital Chamber Files Brief Against Ownership Claim of Dormant Bitcoin Addresses
En développement
Cointelegraph2 g önceBusiness2 dk okuma

Digital Chamber Files Brief Against Ownership Claim of Dormant Bitcoin Addresses

L'essentiel

  • The Digital Chamber, a blockchain trade association, filed an amicus brief opposing a lawsuit seeking ownership of 39,069 dormant Bitcoin addresses.
  • They argue treating these as abandoned property would harm digital asset ownership principles and traditional finance.

Résumé généré par IA

Pourquoi c'est important

A lawsuit seeks ownership of 39,069 dormant Bitcoin addresses, potentially worth $234 billion. The Digital Chamber argues this could undermine digital property rights.

Taille de police

Blockchain trade association the Digital Chamber filed an amicus brief in the New York lost property case seeking ownership of thousands of dormant Bitcoin addresses.

The Monday filing is the second amicus brief in the case. It opposes the claims of ownership, arguing that treating dormant wallets as abandoned property would create a “pervasive cloud on title across self-custody wallets.”

Digital Chamber argues that a ruling based on the plaintiffs’ theory would undermine the “foundational principles of digital property ownership, with negative ripple effects reaching the traditional finance industry.”

The amicus brief was filed in a lawsuit brought by "Noah Doe" and two Wyoming-based companies in late May, seeking ownership of 39,069 dormant Bitcoin addresses, in what could become a test of how inactive crypto may be treated under the state’s lost-property law.

The listed addresses hold an estimated 3.7 million Bitcoin (BTC) worth about $234 billion and include some of the wallet addresses associated with Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, according to Sani, founder of analytics platform Timechain Index.

The Digital Chamber files an amicus brief to dismiss the case seeking ownership of 39,069 Bitcoin wallets. Source: iapps.court.state.ny.us

The Digital Chamber describes itself as the oldest and largest digital asset trade association representing over 250 members, including crypto exchanges, banks, investment firms and other industry participants.

Related: Strategy sells 3,588 Bitcoin for $216M to fund dividends, keeps $2.55B reserve intact

Dormant Bitcoin wallets awaken after lawsuit

Some of the long-dormant Bitcoin wallets named in the lawsuit have been waking up.

At least 31 of the listed addresses moved 17,527 Bitcoin in June, up from five addresses that transferred 4,834 BTC in February, according to Galaxy Digital head of research Alex Thorn.

Source: Alex Thorn

Bitcoin address "1KV47" transferred 30 BTC, worth about $1.88 million, on Saturday, marking the wallet’s first movement in almost 15 years, since August 2011.

Regardless of the lawsuit's outcome, it is unclear how the plaintiffs could gain control of the assets without holding the private keys to the wallets.

On Thursday, a pseudonymous defendant filed a notice of appearance and motion to dismiss, claiming they control one of the dormant wallets named in the lawsuit.

À surveiller

Perspective IA — des possibilités, pas des certitudes

  • Court ruling on dormant Bitcoin ownership

    Spéculatif · En quelques mois

Questions ouvertes

  • How can plaintiffs control assets without private keys?
  • What is the precedent for crypto in lost property law?

Sujets liés

This article was originally published by Cointelegraph.

Articles liés

Plus sur ce sujetbitcoin