Dernière minute
TRCHP Grup Başkanı Özgür Özel, yeni parti kuracaklarını açıkladıKRSouth Korea issues flood advisory for Imjin River after North Korea's unannounced dam water releaseRUUS Strikes on Iran Linked to Deaths of US Military Personnel, AP ReportsDEChiles Präsident ruft nach Stürmen und Regenfällen Katastrophenzustand ausRUТурист погиб на Майорке после столкновения с автомобилем сотрудника отеляINTLChinese and Philippine Navies Clash in Disputed South China SeaRUПосол Молдавии вызван в МИД РФ из-за нарушения Венской конвенцииAUInquest Examines Whether Son Staged Mother's Death After CrashITBorse europee in rialzo, spinta da semiconduttori e petrolioFRHollande et Cazeneuve passent leur tour, Glucksmann temporise… Au PS, la primaire cherche ses candidatsTRCHP Grup Başkanı Özgür Özel, yeni parti kuracaklarını açıkladıKRSouth Korea issues flood advisory for Imjin River after North Korea's unannounced dam water releaseRUUS Strikes on Iran Linked to Deaths of US Military Personnel, AP ReportsDEChiles Präsident ruft nach Stürmen und Regenfällen Katastrophenzustand ausRUТурист погиб на Майорке после столкновения с автомобилем сотрудника отеляINTLChinese and Philippine Navies Clash in Disputed South China SeaRUПосол Молдавии вызван в МИД РФ из-за нарушения Венской конвенцииAUInquest Examines Whether Son Staged Mother's Death After CrashITBorse europee in rialzo, spinta da semiconduttori e petrolioFRHollande et Cazeneuve passent leur tour, Glucksmann temporise… Au PS, la primaire cherche ses candidats
Newsgather
RetourDisney to Pay $50 Million to Settle Antitrust Lawsuit Over Streaming TV Prices
Disney to Pay $50 Million to Settle Antitrust Lawsuit Over Streaming TV Prices
En développement
Times of India26/06/2026Law3 min de lectureIndia

Disney to Pay $50 Million to Settle Antitrust Lawsuit Over Streaming TV Prices

L'essentiel

  • The Walt Disney Company has agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class-action antitrust lawsuit.
  • The suit alleged Disney inflated live TV streaming prices by forcing services like YouTube TV and DirecTV Stream to bundle ESPN, creating an artificial price floor.
  • Millions of subscribers from 2019-2026 may be eligible for payouts.

Résumé généré par IA

Taille de police

The Walt Disney Company reportedly agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class-action antitrust lawsuit alleging that the media giant used its massive market leverage to artificially inflate the prices of live television streaming services. The settlement is set to benefit millions of consumers who held subscriptions to YouTube TV, DirecTV Stream, DirecTV Now, or AT&T TV Now at any point between April 1, 2019, and March 31, 2026. As ArsTechnica reports, a group of YouTube TV subscribers filed a class action complaint in November 2022. Four YouTube TV subscribers filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs accused Disney of entering into anticompetitive carriage agreements with internet-based live TV distributors, a sector known in the industry as the streaming live pay TV market. According to the lawsuit, Disney wielded absolute pricing power over the entire market by forcing these services to include its premium sports network, ESPN, in their cheapest, standard base packages. The filing argued that by forcing mandatory bundling and simultaneously raising prices for its own live streaming service, Hulu + Live TV, Disney effectively established an artificial price floor that caused subscription costs to skyrocket across the entire industry. The complaint filing reads in part: … these carriage agreement mandates—which now cover all of Disney’s leading competitors in the SLPTV Market—allow Disney to use ESPN and Hulu to set a price floor in the SLPTV Market and to inflate prices marketwide by raising the prices of its own products. And this is exactly what Disney has done in the past three years, since it took operational control of Hulu.

To illustrate the financial impact on consumers, the complaint pointed out that YouTube TV’s base package jumped drastically from $35 to $65 after adding Disney-owned channels. The plaintiffs also noted that during a tense 2021 carriage dispute, YouTube TV openly stated that its monthly base plan would be $15 cheaper if it were allowed to drop Disney’s networks entirely. In fact, in a tweet at the time, YouTube TV hinted that networks requiring carriage of a full portfolio of channels. The tweet read, "Most networks require that we include their full portfolio of channels to subscribers, which increases the overall price of the service. We’re committed to continuing to innovate our service and offer flexible options to members in the future." While the lawsuit originally sought class-action certification and a jury trial, the opposing parties ultimately resolved the matter outside of the courtroom. The two sides quietly reached a settlement agreement in March, which received preliminary approval from a federal judge later that month. A final approval hearing has been officially scheduled for January 14. Under the terms of the final agreement, Disney will pay out the $50 million sum but admits to absolutely no wrongdoing. Additionally, the entertainment giant has agreed to consider offering distributors the option to purchase smaller, skinnier channel bundles that exclude ESPN during negotiations over the next three years.

To participate in the settlement, eligibility is divided by geography. Customers are classified as belonging to "Repealer Jurisdictions," which encompass 40 states including Alabama, New York, California, and Florida. All remaining states and U.S. territories are designated as "Non-Repealer Jurisdictions." The final cash payout amount for each eligible person will depend on the total length of their YouTube TV or DirecTV Stream subscription, as well as the overall number of valid claims filed. To receive compensation, eligible subscribers must submit a valid claim form through the Online TV Settlement website by September 8, 2026. Alternatively, anyone wishing to exclude themselves from the settlement must submit a written request by mail by that same September 8, 2026 deadline. Exclusion requests must be sent to the settlement administrator at Biddle v. Disney, Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box 4720, Portland, OR 97208-4720.

Sujets liés

This article was originally published by Times of India.

Articles liés

Delhi High Court Rules Sonam Wangchuk to Remain at Safdarjung Hospital
En développement·hier

Delhi High Court Rules Sonam Wangchuk to Remain at Safdarjung Hospital

The Delhi High Court ruled that climate activist Sonam Wangchuk will continue treatment at Safdarjung Hospital, declining his wife's plea for transfer to a private facility. The court found his initial transfer to the government hospital was not arbitrary, citing his deteriorating health during a hunger strike and an earlier court order for medical monitoring. The next hearing is scheduled for July 24.

Economic Times
4 min de lecture
Plus sur ce sujetdisney