Newsgather
BackHow your MP voted on Mandelson vetting inquiry
How your MP voted on Mandelson vetting inquiry
Politique
BBC News28.04.2026Politique1 dk okuma

How your MP voted on Mandelson vetting inquiry

MPs reject motion to investigate whether PM misled Commons over Lord Mandelson's US ambassador appointment

L'essentiel

  • MPs have voted against a parliamentary investigation into whether Sir Keir Starmer misled the Commons over vetting of Lord Mandelson for ambassador to the US.
  • The motion, brought by Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and supported by Liberal Democrats, SNP, DUP and independents, was defeated by 335 votes to 223, a majority of 112.
  • The motion outlined three areas where the PM may have misled the House regarding the appointment.

Résumé généré par IA

Pourquoi c'est important

This vote comes amid controversy over Lord Mandelson's appointment as UK ambassador to the US, with opposition parties claiming the Prime Minister may have misled Parliament about the vetting process.

Taille de police

MPs have voted against a parliamentary investigation into whether Sir Keir Starmer misled the Commons over the vetting of Lord Mandelson for his appointment as the UK's ambassador to the US. The prime minister has denied accusations he misled MPs over the process relating to Lord Mandelson's appointment to the role, which he took up in February 2025. But Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch brought a motion outlining three possible points on which Sir Keir may have misled MPs and calling for him to be referred to the Commons Privileges Committee for investigation. Some 223 MPs voted to refer the prime minister and 335 against, giving a majority of 112. The motion, led by Badenoch but also supported by Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey, as well as SNP, DUP and independent MPs, set out three possible areas where the prime minister may have misled the House of Commons. The first was his insistence that "full due process" was followed in Lord Mandelson's appointment as ambassador to the US. The second was his claim in the Commons last week that Lord Mandelson's position "was subject to developed vetting". The third was on the question of whether pressure was applied on the Foreign Office to approve the appointment.

Questions ouvertes

  • What specific details were misleading in the PM's statements?
  • Will there be further political consequences for the PM?
  • What was the actual vetting process for Lord Mandelson?

Sujets liés

This article was originally published by BBC News.

Articles liés

Plus sur ce sujetparliamentary vote