Dernière minute
Newsgather
BackJamie Dimon wants Cos to get rid of managers who...
ACTU
Economic Times05.05.2026Business2 dk okumaIndia

Jamie Dimon wants Cos to get rid of managers who...

Pourquoi c'est important

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, spoke at the Norges Bank Investment Management’s investment conference. He has previously expressed concerns about corporate culture and efficiency. The article also briefly mentions election results in India.

Taille de police

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon identified bureaucracy as a "silent killer" that breeds complacency and internal politics, urging companies to eliminate managers who prioritize process over outcomes.

He advocates for smaller, focused teams with clear accountability, likening them to Navy SEALs, to drive results and avoid lengthy deliberations. The American CEO urged companies to eliminate managers who follow such practices.

Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase CEO, wants companies to get rid of managers who enable bureaucracy, which, according to him, is a silent killer for organizations that brings with it many other problems. “Bureaucracy, complacency, and arrogance will take down a company,” Jamie Dimon said during the Norges Bank Investment Management’s investment conference, reported Fortune. “Bureaucracy is like the petri dish of politics and everything else.” "Get rid of the jerks", Jamie Dimon has a simple solution for bureaucracy.

Assembly Elections 2026

Election Results 2026 Live Updates: Who's ahead in which state

West Bengal Election Results 2026 Live Updates

TN Election Result 2026 Live Updates

ALSO READ: BJP's Bengal and Assam win draws comment from Shashi Tharoor

Jamie Dimon's remarks on bureaucracy

According to America's largest bank, JPMorgan Chase CEO, bureaucracy is a silent killer that breeds complacency, arrogance, and internal politics. According to Jamie Dimon, these internal issues are often the biggest reasons in deciding whether a company lives or dies. With JPMorgan Chase employing more than 3,00,000 people across the globe, bureaucracy makes large companies more vulnerable but also emphasises that even smaller firms or divisions can suffer from the same problem.

ALSO READ: 'Assam made Pawan Khera eat peda': Himanta Sarma

What solution does Jamie Dimon have?

The solution, he said, is to tackle the problem from the top down, get rid of them or bureaucratic managers that focus more on the process than the outcome. “They admire a problem. I say they’re like good bureaucrats,” he said. “They like the process, not the outcome. Whereas I like the outcome.”

Alongside this, Dimon criticised “super presentations” that highlight achievements but ignore areas where competitors are outperforming JPMorgan. He also said a key sign of bureaucracy is the withholding of information, stressing that all relevant material should be shared in advance of meetings. “If [information] isn’t shared properly, I generally just cancel the meeting,” he said.

Live Events

Smaller teams have better accountability

Despite leading one of the biggest banks in the world, Dimon has always been keen on assigning the most important work to small groups, which he likened as having the focus of Navy SEALs. He takes the opposite approach, meaning creating smaller teams which have better accountability.

“Get the people in the room and work it out. Don’t allow it to go back and forth with groups for six months or nine months or a year,” he said.

“I have to earn my trust and respect every day, too. It isn’t like I walk in a room and somehow you have to trust me. You don’t. You’re going to be watching closely—what does the boss do, what does he say, does he really mean it, does he follow up.”

Questions ouvertes

  • What specific metrics does Dimon use to identify bureaucratic managers?
  • How can companies effectively measure outcomes versus process?
  • What are the potential challenges in implementing smaller, more agile teams in large, established organizations?
  • Are there any counterarguments to Dimon's 'get rid of the jerks' approach?

Sujets liés

This article was originally published by Economic Times.

Articles liés