Judge Refuses to Postpone Trial for Key Bridge Collapse Civil Claims
L'essentiel
- A federal judge has denied a request to postpone the civil trial for claims stemming from the 2024 Baltimore Key Bridge collapse, rejecting arguments from companies facing criminal charges.
- The trial is set to begin June 1, with victims' families urging the court to maintain the schedule.
Résumé généré par IA
Pourquoi c'est important
The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore collapsed on March 26, 2024, after the container ship Dali lost power and struck it, resulting in six fatalities. Civil claims are pending, and criminal charges have recently been filed against companies managing the ship.
BALTIMORE -- A federal judge on Wednesday refused to postpone a trial that is scheduled to start next month for civil claims stemming from the 2024 collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge, rejecting a request for a delay by companies involved in the deadly disaster.
U.S. District Judge James Bredar said the civil trial will start as scheduled on June 1 despite the recent filing of criminal charges against companies that managed the container ship Dali, which lost power and crashed into the Key Bridge in the early-morning hours of March 26, 2024.
Six construction workers who had been filling potholes were killed in the bridge collapse. Attorneys for victims and their families had urged Bredar to preserve the current schedule for the civil trial.
On May 12, Justice Department prosecutors announced the indictment against Singapore-based Synergy Marine Pte Ltd. and Chennai, India-based Synergy Maritime Pte Ltd. Also charged in the indictment was Radhakrishnan Karthik Nair, an Indian national who was the Dali's technical superintendent.
The companies and Nair are charged with conspiracy, misconduct causing death, failing to immediately inform the U.S. Coast Guard of a hazardous condition, obstructing the National Transportation Safety Board and making false statements.
Company attorneys said trial witnesses are reluctant to testify before the criminal case has been resolved. But the judge said sticking with the current trial schedule would be "the most efficient use of judicial resources.”
“We're ready to go,” Bredar said during a hearing.
The criminal indictment accuses the ship operator of intentionally relying on an improper fuel pump and then lying about it to investigators. Synergy Marine accused prosecutors of improperly treating an accident as a crime.
In April, a $2.25 billion settlement was announced between the state of Maryland, Synergy Marine and Grace Ocean Private Limited, the Singapore-based ship owner. Grace Ocean hasn't been charged with any crimes related to the collapse.
The deal didn’t resolve the pending claims by victims’ families. Victims' attorney Daniel Rose said the companies have known since “day one” that criminal charges were likely to be filed.
“We're all prepared (for trial),” Rose said. “Let's proceed.”
À surveiller
Perspective IA — des possibilités, pas des certitudes
The civil trial will proceed as scheduled on June 1.
Très probable · En quelques jours
Questions ouvertes
- Will the criminal case impact the civil trial's proceedings or outcomes?
- What specific evidence led to the criminal charges against the ship operators?
- Will there be further settlements or trials for the remaining civil claims?
- What are the long-term implications for maritime safety regulations following this incident?
