Dernière minute
ARمانشستر سيتي يضم إليوت أندرسون بـ135 مليون يوروARالقيادة المركزية الأمريكية تشن الليلة الثالثة عشرة من الضربات على أهداف عسكرية إيرانيةARتسريبات تكشف مواصفات هاتف غوغل جديدARإسرائيل لا ترغب في مواجهة عسكرية محدودة بين الولايات المتحدة وإيرانARترمب: تعويض أضرار الهجمات الإيرانية في الخليج من الأصول المجمدةARإغلاق قاعة طعام بقاعدة فورت هود بعد انتشار الصراصير وفيديو يكشف مشكلات أوسع في الجيش الأمريكيARاستطلاعات الرأي تشير إلى فوز المعارضة اليمينية في الانتخابات البولنديةARترامب يهدد إيران بسداد تكلفة الأضرار من أموالها المجمدةARألمانيا تدين هجمات الحوثيين على سفن سعودية وترامب يهدد بعقاب عسكري كبيرARالحوثيون يصعدون التوترات بهجوم على سفينة سعودية في البحر الأحمرARمانشستر سيتي يضم إليوت أندرسون بـ135 مليون يوروARالقيادة المركزية الأمريكية تشن الليلة الثالثة عشرة من الضربات على أهداف عسكرية إيرانيةARتسريبات تكشف مواصفات هاتف غوغل جديدARإسرائيل لا ترغب في مواجهة عسكرية محدودة بين الولايات المتحدة وإيرانARترمب: تعويض أضرار الهجمات الإيرانية في الخليج من الأصول المجمدةARإغلاق قاعة طعام بقاعدة فورت هود بعد انتشار الصراصير وفيديو يكشف مشكلات أوسع في الجيش الأمريكيARاستطلاعات الرأي تشير إلى فوز المعارضة اليمينية في الانتخابات البولنديةARترامب يهدد إيران بسداد تكلفة الأضرار من أموالها المجمدةARألمانيا تدين هجمات الحوثيين على سفن سعودية وترامب يهدد بعقاب عسكري كبيرARالحوثيون يصعدون التوترات بهجوم على سفينة سعودية في البحر الأحمر
Newsgather
RetourJustice Elena Kagan: Supreme Court Not a 'Puppet' for Trump
Justice Elena Kagan: Supreme Court Not a 'Puppet' for Trump
Politique
ABC Newsil y a 2 heuresPolitique4 min de lectureUnited States

Justice Elena Kagan: Supreme Court Not a 'Puppet' for Trump

L'essentiel

  • Justice Elena Kagan stated the conservative Supreme Court is not a "puppet" for President Trump, citing rulings against his tariffs and birthright citizenship efforts, despite siding with his administration in many cases.
  • She also discussed the court's ethics code and Trump's attendance at oral arguments.

Résumé généré par IA

Pourquoi c'est important

Justice Elena Kagan addressed lawyers and judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit, asserting that the deeply conservative Supreme Court has, at significant times, checked the executive branch, specifically citing rulings against former President Trump's tariffs and birthright citizenship efforts. She also discussed the court's first code of ethics and Trump's unprecedented attendance at oral arguments.

Taille de police

BELLEVUE, Wash. -- The U.S. Supreme Court may be deeply conservative, but it is not simply a rubber stamp for President Donald Trump, Justice Elena Kagan said Thursday.

Kagan, one of the court's three liberal justices, told an audience of lawyers and judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit in Bellevue, Washington, that at significant times, on some big issues, “the court has checked the executive branch.”

The court has sided with the Trump administration in the vast majority of cases to come before it so far, including largely upholding his immigration crackdown and expanding Trump's authority over federal regulatory agencies. But Kagan pointed to key rulings where the president did not get what he sought, such as decisions rejecting Trump's sweeping tariffs and his efforts to strip birthright citizenship from the children of people who are in the U.S. illegally.

“Is this court very conservative? Does it do a bunch of things that are out of the playbook of the conservative legal movement that I think are deeply wrong? You know, yes,” Kagan said. “But is this court the kind of puppet for the current administration? I think definitely not.”

Polling has found public trust in the Supreme Court at historic lows in recent years, and a number of critics of the current court have suggested political motivations on the part of its justices. Trump has personally assailed justices who rule against him in stark terms. One liberal justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, said in May after the court struck down a majority-Black district in Louisiana and weakened the Voting Rights Act that the institution risked being seen as political.

Chief Justice John Roberts, who was among those joining the court's liberal justices on some key cases such as birthright citizenship and tariffs, has fought back against the perception that the justices are “political actors,” calling it a misunderstanding.

Kagan, often seen as a bridge-builder, echoed that approach in her comments Thursday, which followed her testimony before Congress alongside conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett last week on security threats and other issues facing the court.

Kagan reiterated her support for appointing a committee of retired judges to enforce the Supreme Court's first code of ethics, adopted in 2023 during a storm of criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices. While the justices are taking the ethics code seriously, opinions differ on the court about how or whether it might be enforced, and no conclusions have been reached, she said.

Kagan also offered a view from the bench of a historic moment from the court's past term, when Trump himself took a front-row seat for arguments over his birthright citizenship order. He was the first sitting president to attend oral arguments.

It was largely a “non-event” for the justices, Kagan said. Trump took a seat off to the side, in an area relatively far from the bench typically reserved for members of Congress, and the court made no announcement of his presence. Many in the audience couldn't see him, she noted.

“He was just like a person who came in and sat down and then had to listen to an argument,” Kagan said.

The president remained for about half of the lengthy arguments, leaving when the other side began making its case.

“You really did kind of think, he probably has other things to do, you know?” said Kagan, who served as solicitor general during the Obama administration. “I was sort of thinking, I worked for a president, and when a president walks into the room, you get the whole ‘Hail to the Chief' stuff. And there was like none of that. And so, I don’t know, I think he probably won’t come back.”

Questions ouvertes

  • How will the Supreme Court's ethics code be enforced?
  • Will public trust in the Supreme Court improve?
  • Will President Trump attend future oral arguments?

Sujets liés

This article was originally published by ABC News.

Articles liés

FCC Chair Brendan Carr Faces Scrutiny Over Multiple Policy Decisions and Actions
Politique·il y a 6 heures

FCC Chair Brendan Carr Faces Scrutiny Over Multiple Policy Decisions and Actions

FCC Chair Brendan Carr is at the center of several controversies, including a vote to end the national broadcast ownership cap, introducing the JAWBONE Act for suing over coerced content removal, facing a court petition to repeal the News Distortion Policy, scrutinizing children's TV content on gender identity, clarifying comments on Iran war coverage, facing Senate testimony scrutiny, investigating a BBC documentary, proposing changes to broadband billing transparency, and being publicly criticized by Jimmy Kimmel.

The Verge
5 min de lecture
Plus sur ce sujetsupreme court