Opposition Denounces Unification Ministry White Paper's 'Two-State Relationship' Reference
L'essentiel
South Korean opposition lawmakers slammed the Unification Ministry's white paper for describing inter-Korean relations as a 'two-state relationship,' calling it a constitutional violation and an abandonment of unification goals.
Résumé généré par IA
Pourquoi c'est important
South Korean opposition lawmakers are reacting strongly to the Unification Ministry's latest white paper, which referred to inter-Korean relations as a 'two-state relationship.' This framing is seen by the opposition as a violation of the South Korean Constitution and a departure from the goal of peaceful unification.
SEOUL, May 19 (Yonhap) -- Lawmakers of the main opposition People Power Party (PPP) denounced the unification ministry Tuesday for describing South and North Korea as a "two-state relationship" in its latest white paper, calling it a clear violation of the Constitution.
In the annual white paper released Monday, the first such document issued under the Lee Jae Myung administration, the ministry highlighted the need to shift toward a "peace-oriented two-state relationship" aimed at achieving unification, considering the reality that the Koreas exist as de facto two states.
The ministry's reference to the Koreas as two states sparked backlash among opposition lawmakers, who argue that it could be interpreted as effectively recognizing the North as a separate state in violation of Article 3 of the Constitution, which stipulates that the territory of the Republic of Korea consists of the Korean Peninsula and its adjacent islands.
In late 2023, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un declared inter-Korean relations as those between "two states hostile to each other."
In a statement, PPP Rep. Park Choong-kwon, a North Korean defector-turned-lawmaker who serves as spokesperson for the party's central election committee, called the latest white paper a "declaration completely abandoning the human rights of 26 million North Korean residents" and a "fatal act of self-harm" that violates the territorial clause in the Constitution and the obligation to pursue peaceful unification as stipulated in the supreme law.
Article 4 of the Constitution mandates that the country pursue unification and establish a peaceful unification policy based on the principles of liberal democracy.
PPP leader Jang Dong-hyeok wrote on his Facebook account, "A unification white paper that rejects 'unification' is a clear violation of the Constitution."
"Lee Jae Myung has trampled on the Constitution, destroyed national security and given up on peaceful unification," he said. "He is no longer the president of the Republic of Korea."
Rep. Jang also criticized the white paper for using the term "North Korean-born citizens" to refer to North Korean defectors.
The ministry began using the term "North Korean-born citizens" in March, saying it better reflects the status of the defectors as South Korean nationals with full legal entitlements.
PPP chief spokesperson Choi Bo-yoon accused the government of voluntarily aligning itself with the North Korean leader's "anti-unification" stance.
"It directly conflicts with Article 3 of the Constitution, which defines the country's territory, and Article 4, which mandates the establishment of a peaceful unification policy," she said in her statement.
Another PPP spokesperson, Cho Yong-sool, slammed the white paper for effectively recognizing North Korea as a "normal country," while other party members, including four-term lawmaker Lee Jong-bae, called for the immediate withdrawal of the "two-state" reference and the dismissal of Unification Minister Chung Dong-young.
Questions ouvertes
- Will the Unification Ministry retract or amend the 'two-state relationship' reference?
- What is the government's official stance on the constitutional implications of this terminology?
- How will this controversy affect inter-Korean relations and domestic political discourse?






