Solana Institute CEO Urges Senate to Pass CLARITY Crypto Bill with Developer Protections
L'essentiel
Solana Institute CEO Kristin Smith is urging the US Senate to pass the CLARITY crypto market structure bill, emphasizing the need to maintain protections for open-source developers and blockchain infrastructure providers, who she argues should not be regulated as financial intermediaries.
Résumé généré par IA
Pourquoi c'est important
Solana Institute CEO Kristin Smith is advocating for the passage of the CLARITY crypto market structure bill, specifically calling for the preservation of developer protections. She argues that open-source developers and blockchain infrastructure providers should not be subject to financial intermediary regulations. This stance aligns with calls from SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, who views open-source code publication as protected speech.
Solana Institute CEO Kristin Smith is urging the US Senate to pass the CLARITY crypto market structure bill with developer protections intact, arguing that open-source developers and blockchain infrastructure providers should not be regulated as financial intermediaries.
In a thread on the X social media platform, Smith said the market structure legislation “has a real shot at passing the Senate,” making it critical for lawmakers to preserve protections for software developers.
Source: Kristin Smith on X.com
Smith said more than 60 crypto CEOs and founders, including Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko, signed an open letter urging the Senate to maintain robust developer protections in the CLARITY Act.
She said that open-source developers, validators and non-custodial wallet providers do not control user funds or execute transactions and therefore should not be treated as brokers or custodians.
Smith pointed to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), which would provide legal certainty for noncontrolling software developers and blockchain infrastructure providers that do not custody customer assets or control transactions.
Introduced in January by Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden, the bipartisan BRCA aims to prevent open-source developers from being classified as “money transmitters” solely for publishing software code.
The CLARITY Act cleared the Senate Banking Committee in May and was recently placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar, setting the stage for a possible floor vote later this summer.
Related: CLARITY Act will help reshore US crypto industry, attorney says
Echoes SEC commissioner Peirce's calls for developer protections
Smith’s comments echo recent remarks by US Securities and Exchange Commission Commissioner (SEC) Hester Peirce, who argued last week that publishing open-source blockchain code is protected speech and that developers should not be treated as financial intermediaries simply because others use their software.
Speaking at the IC3 Blockchain Camp at Princeton University, Peirce said that “many blockchain projects involve publishing open-source software, which is generally a protected activity under the First Amendment.”
Source: CoinMarketCap on X.com
The SEC’s mandate regarding digital assets has evolved significantly under current Chair Paul Atkins, who vowed to end the agency’s “regulation through enforcement” approach to the industry.
À surveiller
Perspective IA — des possibilités, pas des certitudes
The CLARITY Act will be placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar for a possible floor vote later this summer.
Très probable
Questions ouvertes
- What specific amendments, if any, are being considered for the CLARITY Act regarding developer protections?
- What is the current stance of the broader US Senate on the CLARITY Act and its developer protection clauses?
- What are the potential implications if the CLARITY Act passes without the requested developer protections?
- How will the SEC's approach to digital assets under Chair Paul Atkins continue to evolve in relation to this legislation?
