Starmer faces civil service backlash after sacking top Foreign Office civil servant over Mandelson vetting row
FDA union leader warns PM is 'losing the ability to work with the civil service' as fallout from ambassador appointment controversy enters seventh day
L'essentiel
- Sir Keir Starmer is facing criticism from senior civil servants after sacking Sir Olly Robbins, the permanent under secretary at the Foreign Office, over the Lord Peter Mandelson vetting controversy.
- The FDA trade union warned the PM is 'losing the ability to work with the civil service' and that no civil servant would now feel secure in their job.
- Dame Emily Thornberry, chairing the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, backed the sacking, saying Sir Olly was right to lose his job.
Résumé généré par IA
Pourquoi c'est important
The controversy stems from the appointment of Lord Peter Mandelson as UK ambassador to Washington, with questions about the vetting process. Sir Olly Robbins was the senior civil servant responsible for the Foreign Office's handling of the appointment.
The Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, is being accused of sending a "real chill throughout the civil service" after his decision to sack the lead civil servant in the Foreign Office over the Lord Peter Mandelson vetting fiasco.
Sir Olly Robbins, who gave evidence to the Foreign Affairs Select Committee of MPs on Tuesday, was fired as the permanent under secretary at the Foreign Office last week.
Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA trade union, told BBC Newsnight: "I think the prime minister is losing the ability to work with the civil service."
"Who in the civil service would now think they would be immune from when it is politically expedient to be dismissed?" he asked. "That's not a place any government wants to be because it doesn't deliver for the people of the country," Penman added.
On Monday, Sir Keir sought to play down any sense of a rift with the civil service when he told MPs: "We have thousands of civil servants who act with integrity and professionalism every day."
The row between Downing Street and the union representing senior civil servants is the latest fault line to emerge as a consequence of the most recent revelations relating to the appointment of Lord Mandelson as the UK's ambassador in Washington last year.
Supporters of the prime minister have sought to portray the testimony of Sir Olly as vindication that Sir Keir didn't know about the vetting details or, crucially, conclusions Sir Olly had been briefed about.
Sir Olly told MPs he was right not to share this in order to protect the integrity of the vetting system.
In a boost to Downing Street's position, Dame Emily Thornberry, the Labour MP who chairs the select committee, said after the hearing that she had also concluded that it was right that Sir Olly had lost his job.
This is the seventh day in a row that the self-inflicted damage of the Lord Mandelson saga has rained down on the prime minister, and this element of it over the last week is but a chapter in the wider story.
The minutiae of the prime minister's most politically consequential decision in office are now been forensically dissected and, frequently, in public. At the select committee, in the Commons and in the press.
The building blocks of a judgement call Sir Keir now acknowledges he got catastrophically wrong are being scrutinised daily.
So much for the grid of announcements and campaign events Labour folk in Scotland, Wales and in the areas of England with council elections would love to be focused on.
Instead, there is incessant conversation about Lord Mandelson.
And Sir Olly, who was dumped on by Downing Street from a prime ministerial height over the last few days, responded with a modestly expressed assault on its judgement, sense of fairness and proportion.
Questions ouvertes
- What specific vetting concerns were raised about Lord Mandelson
- Whether Starmer personally knew about vetting issues before the appointment
- Full details of what Robbins was briefed on






