Dernière minute
INTLTrump on Maine Senate Candidate Platner Accusation: 'It's Really a Question of Whether or Not You Believe the Woman'CN美伊局势升级:特朗普威胁打击伊朗,伊朗称将加倍奉还KR상주 산사태경보·문경 홍수주의보 발령KR대전·세종·충남 장맛비로 홍수특보·도로 통제…주민 85명 대피CN屏縣里港警分局預置交管措施 應對巴威颱風強風豪雨CN警惕“国安考公”培训陷阱:虚假宣传、诱导消费、信息泄露ARربع النهائي: 8 منتخبات تتنافس على 4 مقاعد في نصف النهائيCNHong Kong Restaurants Face Closures Amid Falling Rents and Shifting LocationsAUNDIS Service Discontinuation in Albury-Wodonga Affects 110 People with DisabilitiesKR미래에셋증권, OCI홀딩스 목표주가 32만원으로 하향…'매수' 의견 유지INTLTrump on Maine Senate Candidate Platner Accusation: 'It's Really a Question of Whether or Not You Believe the Woman'CN美伊局势升级:特朗普威胁打击伊朗,伊朗称将加倍奉还KR상주 산사태경보·문경 홍수주의보 발령KR대전·세종·충남 장맛비로 홍수특보·도로 통제…주민 85명 대피CN屏縣里港警分局預置交管措施 應對巴威颱風強風豪雨CN警惕“国安考公”培训陷阱:虚假宣传、诱导消费、信息泄露ARربع النهائي: 8 منتخبات تتنافس على 4 مقاعد في نصف النهائيCNHong Kong Restaurants Face Closures Amid Falling Rents and Shifting LocationsAUNDIS Service Discontinuation in Albury-Wodonga Affects 110 People with DisabilitiesKR미래에셋증권, OCI홀딩스 목표주가 32만원으로 하향…'매수' 의견 유지
Newsgather
BackSupreme Court Allows Texas Age Verification Law for App Stores to Proceed
Supreme Court Allows Texas Age Verification Law for App Stores to Proceed
En développement
Al Jazeera2 g öncePolitique2 dk okuma

Supreme Court Allows Texas Age Verification Law for App Stores to Proceed

L'essentiel

  • The US Supreme Court has allowed Texas to enforce a law requiring app stores to verify users' ages and obtain parental consent for minors' app downloads and purchases, while a legal challenge continues.
  • Critics argue the law infringes on First Amendment free speech rights.

Résumé généré par IA

Pourquoi c'est important

Texas passed a law requiring app stores to verify users' ages and obtain parental consent for minors' app downloads and purchases. A legal challenge argues this violates First Amendment free speech protections.

Taille de police

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for Texas to begin enforcing a law that requires app stores to verify users’ ages and obtain parental consent before minors can download apps or make in-app purchases, while a legal challenge continues.

The law, known as the App Store Accountability Act, was signed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott in 2025. It requires app store accounts belonging to anyone under 18 to be linked to a parent or guardian. Before a child or teenager can download any app, parents must be notified of its age rating and approve the download.

Texas urged the court to allow the law to continue to be enforced while a constitutional challenge to it plays out in the lower courts. The state’s Solicitor General William Peterson is arguing that “the modern digital world is different” from the physical world and that the law was needed since children can access “any conceivable content” online without their parents’ knowledge.

But critics say the law goes much further than protecting children.

The challenge was brought by two students, a student advocacy group called Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, and the Computer & Communications Industry Association, whose members include app store operators Apple and Google.

They argue the law violates the US Constitution’s First Amendment protections for free speech by forcing app stores to verify users’ ages before they can access online content.

“No state has ever required its citizens to prove their age before reading a newspaper, entering a bookstore, or even accessing the internet,” the Computer & Communications Industry Association wrote. “The Texas law does exactly that — for every mobile app on every mobile phone.”

That comparison was echoed by a federal judge who blocked the law in December. US District Judge Robert Pitman said the measure was similar to requiring every bookstore to check the age of customers before letting them inside and then requiring parental permission before minors could buy a book.

But in June, a federal appeals court allowed the law to take effect while the legal battle continued, saying that Texas has a “substantial, if not compelling, interest in protecting children, and parents need to have the necessary information to make informed choices affecting their children’s upbringing.”

On Monday, the Supreme Court declined to intervene, leaving the appeals court’s decision in place.

The decision comes a year after the Supreme Court upheld a separate Texas law requiring age verification for pornographic websites, rejecting arguments from the adult entertainment industry that the measure violated adults’ First Amendment rights. That ruling split the court 6-3, with the six conservative justices in the majority and the three liberal justices dissenting.

Questions ouvertes

  • Will the law ultimately be upheld or struck down?
  • What specific age verification methods will be required?
  • What are the potential penalties for non-compliance?

Sujets liés

This article was originally published by Al Jazeera.

Articles liés

Indonesia's Free Meals Program Faces Corruption Scandal Amidst Graft Allegations
En développement·3 dk önce

Indonesia's Free Meals Program Faces Corruption Scandal Amidst Graft Allegations

Indonesia's "Free Nutritious Meals" program, launched in 2025 by President Prabowo Subianto, is embroiled in a major corruption scandal. Allegations of graft and mismanagement plague the $15bn initiative, with officials arresting several individuals, including the head of the National Nutrition Agency, for alleged procurement fraud. Critics argue the program is too large, costly, and prone to corruption, despite its aims to combat child stunting and stimulate the economy.

Al Jazeera
Trump Returns to US on Old Air Force One Amid Security Concerns Over New Jet
En développement·1 sa önce

Trump Returns to US on Old Air Force One Amid Security Concerns Over New Jet

President Trump opted for the older Air Force One over a recently gifted $400 million jet from Qatar due to security concerns and alleged lack of defense systems. Trump cited "old time's sake" but deflected safety questions, while the White House asserted the new jet is secure. The decision follows heightened tensions with Iran, which Trump believes is targeting him for assassination.

The Independent World
Plus sur ce sujetSupreme Court