Dernière minute
TRKırklareli'de Boşandığı Eşini ve Kızını Vuran Adam İntihar EttiCN巴威颱風來襲 勞動部籲雇主加強職安防護ARحوادث متفرقة في قطاعات الطاقة والغاز والذكاء الاصطناعيFRUne avocate mise en examen et détenue pour liens présumés avec un détenuDEMillionen-Einbruch in Gelsenkirchen: Zivilprozesse um Sparkassen-Einbruch ausgesetztDEPalästina setzt Parlamentswahl für den 28. November anFRLe phénomène du "dictateur Mbappé" : le mème qui a envahi la Coupe du mondeCN環球晶與美光簽訂10年長約,美光注資5億美元支持環球晶美國業務PLGdzie jest burza? Aktualna sytuacja pogodowa w PolsceBRDois homens são presos por contrabando de cigarros em Presidente Epitácio (SP)TRKırklareli'de Boşandığı Eşini ve Kızını Vuran Adam İntihar EttiCN巴威颱風來襲 勞動部籲雇主加強職安防護ARحوادث متفرقة في قطاعات الطاقة والغاز والذكاء الاصطناعيFRUne avocate mise en examen et détenue pour liens présumés avec un détenuDEMillionen-Einbruch in Gelsenkirchen: Zivilprozesse um Sparkassen-Einbruch ausgesetztDEPalästina setzt Parlamentswahl für den 28. November anFRLe phénomène du "dictateur Mbappé" : le mème qui a envahi la Coupe du mondeCN環球晶與美光簽訂10年長約,美光注資5億美元支持環球晶美國業務PLGdzie jest burza? Aktualna sytuacja pogodowa w PolsceBRDois homens são presos por contrabando de cigarros em Presidente Epitácio (SP)
Newsgather
BackSupreme Court sets aside order rejecting IPS officer's voluntary retirement plea
Supreme Court sets aside order rejecting IPS officer's voluntary retirement plea
ACTU
Times of India02.06.2026Law1 dk okumaIndia

Supreme Court sets aside order rejecting IPS officer's voluntary retirement plea

L'essentiel

  • The Supreme Court has set aside a home ministry order rejecting the voluntary retirement request of Maharashtra cadre IPS officer Abdur Rahman.
  • The court directed the Centre to re-examine Rahman's plea within three months, considering subsequent chargesheets and the inability to conclude disciplinary proceedings.

Résumé généré par IA

Pourquoi c'est important

Maharashtra cadre IPS officer Abdur Rahman sought voluntary retirement but his request was rejected by the Home Ministry due to various charges against him. He approached the judiciary after his request was not accepted.

Taille de police

Supreme Court has set aside a home ministry order rejecting the voluntary retirement request of Maharashtra cadre IPS officer Abdur Rahman, who faced various charges, including torturing a person in 2014, contracting a second marriage without the consent of his first wife in 2016 and giving a speech in violation of rules in 2019. The officer had tendered a notice in Aug 2019 for VRS under Rule 16(2A) of All India Service (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, but it was not accepted, following which he approached the judiciary. Allowing his plea, a bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Alok Aradhe directed Centre to examine Rahman’s request for VRS afresh and make a decision in three months. Noting that state govt had subsequently filed a chargesheet in three cases, including in 2022 for his participation in CAA protest, SC asked Centre to also consider these cases. “In view of above discussion and analysis, we are of the opinion that central govt has not examined the complaints in detail before taking the decision dated Oct 25, 2019 of not accepting notice for VRS. Further, in view of the subsequent developments where chargesheets were issued but the state govt has been unable to conclude the disciplinary proceedings, the central govt must revisit its decision dated Oct 25, 2019, and examine the notice for voluntary retirement afresh,” the bench said.

À surveiller

Perspective IA — des possibilités, pas des certitudes

  • The Central government will re-examine Abdur Rahman's voluntary retirement request.

    Très probable · En quelques mois

  • A decision on Rahman's VRS will be made within three months.

    Très probable · En quelques mois

Questions ouvertes

  • Will the Centre accept Rahman's VRS request upon re-examination?
  • What will be the outcome of the ongoing disciplinary proceedings?
  • What were the specific details of the charges against Rahman that led to the initial rejection?

Sujets liés

This article was originally published by Times of India.

Articles liés

Same-sex couple challenges Income Tax Act provision in Bombay High Court
En développement·8 sa önce

Same-sex couple challenges Income Tax Act provision in Bombay High Court

A same-sex couple has filed a petition in the Bombay High Court challenging Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, which exempts gifts between spouses from tax. They argue that denying this benefit to same-sex couples is discriminatory as Indian law does not recognize their relationships as marriages. The Income Tax Department opposes the plea, calling it "misconceived" and an attempt to use tax law for marriage recognition.

Times of India
Plus sur ce sujetSupreme Court