Dernière minute
AUTelstra Outage Disrupts Triple-Zero Calls in QueenslandRUВзрывы в Иране после обстрелов США: есть погибшиеARربع النهائي: 8 منتخبات تتنافس على 4 مقاعد في نصف النهائيTROrtakent'te Çıkan Yangın Kontrol Altına AlındıRUЕвропарламент дал понять Зеленскому, что героизация УПА* несовместима с курсом Украины на ЕСBRDona de espetinho nega transfobia e registra B.O. contra influenciadora MalévolaARColdplay و Justin Bieber و Burna Boy و Gustavo Dudamel و PS22 Chorus للمشاركة في حفل ختام كأس العالم FIFAKRSK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won to Attend SK hynix's Nasdaq Listing Ceremony in New YorkARاليابان تحضّر لإطلاق مركبتها المخصصة لاكتشاف قمر المريخ "فوبوس"RUРоссийский аналитик: НАТО готовится к войне с Россией к 2030 годуAUTelstra Outage Disrupts Triple-Zero Calls in QueenslandRUВзрывы в Иране после обстрелов США: есть погибшиеARربع النهائي: 8 منتخبات تتنافس على 4 مقاعد في نصف النهائيTROrtakent'te Çıkan Yangın Kontrol Altına AlındıRUЕвропарламент дал понять Зеленскому, что героизация УПА* несовместима с курсом Украины на ЕСBRDona de espetinho nega transfobia e registra B.O. contra influenciadora MalévolaARColdplay و Justin Bieber و Burna Boy و Gustavo Dudamel و PS22 Chorus للمشاركة في حفل ختام كأس العالم FIFAKRSK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won to Attend SK hynix's Nasdaq Listing Ceremony in New YorkARاليابان تحضّر لإطلاق مركبتها المخصصة لاكتشاف قمر المريخ "فوبوس"RUРоссийский аналитик: НАТО готовится к войне с Россией к 2030 году
Newsgather
BackTrump's $1.8 Billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' Faces Legal Hurdles
Trump's $1.8 Billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' Faces Legal Hurdles
Urgent
The Independent World01.06.2026Politique3 dk okuma

Trump's $1.8 Billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' Faces Legal Hurdles

L'essentiel

  • President Trump's plan for a $1.8 billion compensation fund for allies faces legal challenges.
  • Federal judges have temporarily blocked payments, citing concerns of a 'slush fund' for political supporters and potential corruption.
  • The Department of Justice will comply with the court's ruling.

Résumé généré par IA

Pourquoi c'est important

President Trump proposed a nearly $1.8 billion compensation fund for allies, allegedly as victims of government 'weaponization.' This plan faced immediate legal and political backlash, with federal judges blocking its operation and lawmakers debating its funding.

Taille de police

President Donald Trump is tabling his plans for a nearly $1.8 billion compensation fund designed to pay his allies and alleged “victims” of government “weaponization” after federal judges began firing back at a so-called “settlement” that got him off the hook for tax investigations in exchange for funneling millions of taxpayer dollars to his supporters.

The decision follows a federal court ruling that temporarily blocks the administration from funding or making any payments from what critics have called a “slush fund” to enrich the president’s aggrieved supporters.

The Department of Justice “will abide by the Court’s ruling,” the agency said in a statement Monday.

Last week, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., blocked the administration from “taking any further action pursuant to the creation or operation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund” — including transferring money to it, considering any claims, and mailing any checks while a legal challenge plays out.

Another federal judge is also investigating the so-called “settlement” agreement between the president and the IRS after Trump sued his own administration for $10 billion. The judge will determine whether Trump filed a “frivolous lawsuit for the sole purpose of forcing a settlement” to create a fund for his political allies while the president, his family and their businesses escape government scrutiny for tax debts over which they have been under investigation for more than a decade.

But the scheme has come under heavy fire from members of Congress, where lawmakers abruptly abandoned a series of votes before Memorial Day after hitting an impasse over plans to funnel taxpayer dollars into the fund.

The fund derailed Republican plans to pass legislation to continue funding Immigration and Customs Enforcement, blowing up into a heated closed-door briefing with Senate leaders and and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who would oversee the board that controls the payouts.

Democratic members of Congress were also mulling plans to kill the fund through the upcoming budget process by forcing Republicans to go on-record with their vote for the president’s $1.776 billion reserve.

“The blatant corruption of a slush fund explicitly for insurrectionists and Trump cronies simply could not be ignored,” according to Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen, which is among the plaintiffs suing to block the fund.

“If the Trump administration drops the fund, as is now being reported, it is simply a nod to the realities of how appalling and toxic this fund truly was,” she said. “As important as taking out this disgusting policy is, we must not let it be an excuse to greenlight the massive increases to ICE funding embedded in the reconciliation bill.”

Under opaque plans for the fund, the Department of Justice would tap into a long-standing Judgment Fund to settle any claims brought against the government.

A five-member board made up of Blanche’s appointees would then arrange payments from the fund to recipients — whose identities will remain secret.

Blanche has publicly stated that Trump and his family are not eligible, but Blanche has not ruled out payments to the president’s donors and allies, raising questions about the process and who stands to benefit.

Trump fumed on Truth Social last month that he “gave up a lot of money” to create the fund, despite previously saying he would donate whatever he received from his IRS lawsuit to charity organizations.

“I could have settled my case, including the illegal release of my Tax Returns and the equally illegal BREAK IN of Mar-a-Lago, for an absolute fortune. Instead, I am helping others, who were so badly abused by an evil, corrupt, and weaponized Biden Administration, receive, at long last, JUSTICE!” Trump wrote May 22.

Days earlier, he said he wasn’t involved in the settlement.

“I guess they made a settlement of some kind. I wasn’t involved in the settlement, I could have been involved, but I didn’t choose to be, so they made a settlement,” he told reporters.

Trump said the victims of “weaponization” under the Obama and Biden administrations — an apparent reference to his allies who were investigated in connection with his 2016 and 2020 campaigns and the attack on the Capitol — were “destroyed, they went to jail, their families were ruined, they committed suicide.”

“We’re reimbursing those people for their legal fees and for their costs, and for anybody involved,” he added. “It was the most violent thing I’ve ever seen in politics.”

À surveiller

Perspective IA — des possibilités, pas des certitudes

  • The legal challenges to the Anti-Weaponization Fund will continue.

    Très probable · En quelques semaines

  • Congress will likely not approve funding for the Anti-Weaponization Fund in its current form.

    Probable · En quelques mois

  • The Department of Justice will seek to modify or abandon the fund's current structure.

    Probable · En quelques semaines

Questions ouvertes

  • Will the Trump administration appeal the court's ruling?
  • What are the long-term implications for government settlement funds?
  • Will Congress find a compromise on ICE funding?
  • What specific criteria will be used if the fund is eventually approved?

Sujets liés

This article was originally published by The Independent World.

Articles liés

Indonesia's Free Meals Program Faces Corruption Scandal Amidst Graft Allegations
En développement·11 dk önce

Indonesia's Free Meals Program Faces Corruption Scandal Amidst Graft Allegations

Indonesia's "Free Nutritious Meals" program, launched in 2025 by President Prabowo Subianto, is embroiled in a major corruption scandal. Allegations of graft and mismanagement plague the $15bn initiative, with officials arresting several individuals, including the head of the National Nutrition Agency, for alleged procurement fraud. Critics argue the program is too large, costly, and prone to corruption, despite its aims to combat child stunting and stimulate the economy.

Al Jazeera
Trump Returns to US on Old Air Force One Amid Security Concerns Over New Jet
En développement·1 sa önce

Trump Returns to US on Old Air Force One Amid Security Concerns Over New Jet

President Trump opted for the older Air Force One over a recently gifted $400 million jet from Qatar due to security concerns and alleged lack of defense systems. Trump cited "old time's sake" but deflected safety questions, while the White House asserted the new jet is secure. The decision follows heightened tensions with Iran, which Trump believes is targeting him for assassination.

The Independent World
Plus sur ce sujetDonald Trump