Trump's China Visit: A '12 out of 10' Deal for Beijing
L'essentiel
- US President Donald Trump's visit to China resulted in significant deals, including 200 Boeing aircraft and the establishment of investment and trade boards.
- China views the visit itself as a major triumph, marking a shift towards a "constructive China-US relationship of strategic stability" where the US officially recognizes China as a peer power.
Résumé généré par IA
Pourquoi c'est important
The article discusses the significance of US President Donald Trump's visit to China, highlighting economic deals and the establishment of new bilateral boards. It contrasts the current visit with past US-China relations, noting a decline since Trump's presidency but China's emergence as a stronger power.
The future of the relationship is likely to be unscripted and messy at times, even full of friction, yet somehow maintaining a rhythm
3 -MIN READ3 -MIN
Listen
Senior Colonel Zhou Bo (ret) is a senior fellow of the Centre for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University and a China Forum expert.
Published: 8:30pm, 22 May 2026Updated: 9:14pm, 22 May 2026
On the face of it, US President Donald Trump’s China visit can be characterised by five Bs: beef, beans, Boeings, a board of investment and a board of trade. No wonder Trump rated his visit a “12 on a scale of one to 10”. Just the 200 Boeing aircraft China has agreed to buy is worth the presidential visit.
China has achieved no less. Compared with beef, beans and Boeings, the boards of investment and trade that both sides agreed to set up are perhaps more significant. With this institutional framework in place, bilateral economic and trade disputes can be brought under regular supervision and coordination. Reckless moves such as the United States arbitrarily imposing a 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods should become far less likely.
China has acted as an impeccable host. President Xi Jinping taking Trump on a private tour of the gardens of Zhongnanhai – which serves as Xi’s official residence and the headquarters of China’s top leadership – is special treatment. Trump’s warm remarks about Xi and the Chinese people look to be more than a polite gesture.
Yet the real triumph for China is the visit itself – the first by a US president in nine years; Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden did not visit China at all during his term. For comparison, during the Cold War, after Nikita Khrushchev became the first Soviet leader to visit the US in 1959, it was eight years before a second Soviet leader, Alexei Kosygin, was invited to visit in 1967. No US president visited the Soviet Union in that time.
The best outcome from the Xi-Trump summit is their consensus to build “a constructive China-US relationship of strategic stability”. Evidently, stability can only be established between two parties of equal strength – for the first time, the US officially recognises China as a peer power.
Such recognition has not come easily. Since Trump first became president, relations have declined significantly, yet China has emerged much stronger. From 2017 to 2025, China’s export dependence on the US has dropped by 5.5 percentage points. In the tariff war launched by Washington, Beijing has wielded several lethal weapons including key industrial raw materials such as rare earths. The world saw that China was not the first to blink.
01:56
‘A milestone visit’: Xi and Trump set sights on stability for China-US relations
À surveiller
Perspective IA — des possibilités, pas des certitudes
Bilateral economic and trade disputes will be brought under regular supervision and coordination.
Probable · Moyen terme
Reckless moves such as the United States arbitrarily imposing a 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods should become far less likely.
Probable · Moyen terme
The future of the China-US relationship will be unscripted, messy, and at times full of friction, yet maintain a rhythm.
Probable · Long terme
Questions ouvertes
- What specific functions will the investment and trade boards have?
- How will the 'strategic stability' be maintained in practice?
- What are the long-term implications of the US recognizing China as a peer power?
- Will the 'messy and friction-filled' aspects of the relationship be managed effectively?





