University of Sussex Wins Legal Challenge Against Record £585,000 Fine Over Free Speech
High Court finds in university's favour on most issues, including bias in OfS decision-making process
L'essentiel
- The University of Sussex has successfully challenged a record £585,000 fine issued by the Office for Students over its trans and non-binary inclusion policy.
- The High Court ruled in favour of the university on most grounds, including upholding concerns about bias in the regulator's decision-making process.
- Mrs Justice Lieven found that the OfS had "closed its mind" to anything that would not lead to finding a failure to uphold free speech.
Résumé généré par IA
The University of Sussex has won its legal challenge of a record £585,000 fine over freedom of speech. The fine was issued by the Office for Students (OfS), the regulator of England's universities, over the university's trans and non-binary inclusion policy which it said had a "chilling" effect on free speech.
On most of the issues raised by the university, the High Court found in its favour, including concerns about bias in how the decision was made. The Vice Chancellor of Sussex said it raised serious questions about the regulator, while the OfS described the ruling as disappointing.
The High Court case did not consider what happened to Kathleen Stock, who left her job as professor of philosophy at Sussex after protests and threats over her view that gender was not more important than biological sex.
High Court judge Mrs Justice Lieven ruled on Wednesday whether a proper process was followed in issuing the fine, the size of which sent shockwaves through universities across England. The fine was issued on the basis of Sussex's trans and non-binary policy, which included a requirement to "positively represent trans people" and warned against "transphobic propaganda".
In court, the University of Sussex had argued the trans and non-binary policy was not what is called a "governing document" and did not have the importance attached to it by regulator the OfS. This concern was upheld by today's judgement, along with several other aspects of the process.
Perhaps most damaging for the regulator meant to oversee freedom of speech, the accusation of bias in the process was also upheld. Mrs Justice Lieven said the OfS had "closed its mind" to anything that would lead to not finding failure to uphold freedom of speech and therefore fine the university. The regulator was also found to have taken a flawed approach to deciding what was academic freedom.
As part of the investigation which led to the fine, the OfS interviewed Stock, but the court had heard it did not meet anyone from the university in person despite requests from the institution to discuss concerns.
Stock had faced repeated protests and threats while professor of philosophy at Sussex, in what became one of the most high-profile freedom of speech rows at a UK university. Last August, after the fine was issued, a new freedom of speech law covering England's universities came into force giving the regulator even stronger powers.
