administrative error

Stable3 articles2 sourcesDernière mise à jour: 30.04.2026

Sujets associéssk ibrahim 104 year old voter east burdwan jamalpur election commission voter registration batrishbigha west bengal

Derniers articles

104-Year-Old Voter Casts Ballot After Election Commission Administrative Error Delayed His Registration

Politique

30.04.2026Résumé IA

104-Year-Old Voter Casts Ballot After Election Commission Administrative Error Delayed His Registration

Sk Ibrahim, a 104-year-old resident of Jamalpur in East Burdwan, West Bengal, successfully cast his vote in the recent election after facing administrative issues with his voter registration. His name had been placed under adjudication due to a discrepancy between his name appearing as 'Sk Ibrahim' in 2002 and 'Ibrahim Sk' in 2025. After his name appeared on the supplementary list, the administration provided him transport and wheelchair assistance to vote.

Times of India

‘You can’t breach a contract you never received’: Muzarabani’s camp slams PSL ban

ACTU

19.04.2026

‘You can’t breach a contract you never received’: Muzarabani’s camp slams PSL ban

Zimbabwean pacer Blessing Muzarabani faces a two-year PSL ban for withdrawing from a deal, but his agency vehemently denies any wrongdoing. They assert no formal contract was signed, making the ban unjustified. While the league cites a breach of commitment, the agency calls the penalty excessive and urges its withdrawal, highlighting an administrative error amidst Muzarabani's IPL success.

Times of India

Vodafone incentivised security staff to fine its own franchisees

ACTU

19.04.2026

Vodafone incentivised security staff to fine its own franchisees

Shopkeepers charged millions of pounds, including alleged £10,000 penalty for mistake that cost firm £7.08Vodafone incentivised its security staff to increase “clawbacks” levied on its own franchisees, as part of a programme that led to the telecoms group fining its own shopkeepers millions of pounds for seemingly small administrative errors.The policy – which included one alleged case of a £10,000 penalty for a franchisee whose mistake cost Vodafone £7.08 – involved setting “key performance indicators” (KPIs) for the telecoms group’s internal employees to collect total annual fines of £1.5m from the small business people running the FTSE 100 company’s high street stores. Continue reading...

Guardian Business