Newsgather

transgender rights

Stable4 articles3 sourcesDernière mise à jour: 14 sa önce

Derniers articles

OfS suffers humiliating high court defeat as regulator's failures pile up
En développement
Education·29.04.2026Résumé IA

OfS suffers humiliating high court defeat as regulator's failures pile up

The Office for Students (OfS) suffered a major embarrassment when the high court rejected its £500,000 fine against the University of Sussex related to Kathleen Stock's departure. Mrs Justice Lieven found bias and predetermination in the OfS's handling of the case. The regulator, under former chief executive Susan Lapworth, faces criticism for failing to act on for-profit colleges and the University of Greater Manchester despite media exposure of problems.

G
Guardian UK
Sussex University Overturns £585,000 OfS Fine in High Court Ruling
En développement
Education·29.04.2026Résumé IA

Sussex University Overturns £585,000 OfS Fine in High Court Ruling

Sussex University has successfully overturned a record £585,000 fine from England's higher education regulator (OfS) after the high court rejected claims the university breached free speech regulations involving former professor Kathleen Stock. The court ruled the OfS lacked legal authority to investigate the university's handling of protests against Stock over her transgender rights views, which led to her resignation in 2021. The ruling represents a significant blow to the regulator's credibility and raises questions about its legal framework.

G
Guardian UK
Supreme Court to Hear Petition Challenging 2026 Transgender Rights Amendment
En développement
Law·21.04.2026Résumé IA

Supreme Court to Hear Petition Challenging 2026 Transgender Rights Amendment

A petition filed in the Supreme Court challenges the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, arguing it erases trans men and trans masculine identities from legal recognition. Led by activists Manveer Yadav, Vishwanath Maithil, Abhina Aher, and Vinshi Shahi, the petition claims the amendment replaces a self-determination framework with biological markers, reintroduces the rejected Corbett Biological Test, and violates informational privacy. The case is likely to be heard by a CJI-led bench on April 27.

T
Times of India