Meta's AI smart glasses, despite privacy safeguards, raise alarming concerns over surveillance, digital sexual abuse, and potential misuse by stalkers or governments, exacerbated by influencer normalization and weak enforcement of safety guidelines.
Tattoos can interfere with the sensors in smartwatches and fitness trackers, leading to inaccurate heart rate readings and wrist detection issues. While device makers acknowledge the problem, current workarounds are not ideal, and further research is needed to improve sensor technology.
Google is launching new AI-powered smart glasses this autumn, featuring Gemini integration and private audio assistance. This marks a return to the smart glasses market after the failure of Google Glass over a decade ago, facing similar privacy concerns as competitors like Meta.
The pet fitness tracker market is projected to grow to $450m (£333m) by 2035, but veterinary experts are divided on their value. While owners like Bryan Becker credit the devices with helping manage his anxious dog's medication dosage, Dr Elizabeth Mullineaux of the British Veterinary Association warns they are costly and could cause needless worry. Supporters argue pets hide pain instinctively and trackers enable early intervention, while critics emphasise that day-to-day observations and veterinary expertise remain essential.
Journalist Elle Hunt explores the benefits and privacy risks of Meta's AI-powered glasses after wearing them for a month. The discussion also highlights potential accessibility breakthroughs and the real-world impact of covert filming by users.
