Son Dakika
RUВ аэропорту «Жуковский» введены временные ограничения на прием и выпуск самолетовCN公安机关严打涉汛网络谣言 25起典型案例公布CN台股飆漲,股民獲利未見「大買特買」,餐飲業成最大受惠者KR구마모토, TSMC 유치로 재기 꿈꾸지만…지역 성장 담보 '묘수' 필요KR대웅제약, 보툴리눔 톡신 '나보타' 누적 매출 1조원 돌파ARبريطانيا تخصص 54 مليون جنيه إسترليني لتعزيز أمن الأحياء اليهوديةKR원주시, 산업혁신 기반 구축사업 선정…100억 투입해 제조혁신 박차CN台股狂飆財富效應兩極化 消費產業冷熱不均KRLS일렉트릭, 인피니언과 AI 데이터센터 위한 DC 전력 기술 공동 개발KR크래프톤 '미메시스', 글로벌 누적 판매량 200만 장 돌파RUВ аэропорту «Жуковский» введены временные ограничения на прием и выпуск самолетовCN公安机关严打涉汛网络谣言 25起典型案例公布CN台股飆漲,股民獲利未見「大買特買」,餐飲業成最大受惠者KR구마모토, TSMC 유치로 재기 꿈꾸지만…지역 성장 담보 '묘수' 필요KR대웅제약, 보툴리눔 톡신 '나보타' 누적 매출 1조원 돌파ARبريطانيا تخصص 54 مليون جنيه إسترليني لتعزيز أمن الأحياء اليهوديةKR원주시, 산업혁신 기반 구축사업 선정…100억 투입해 제조혁신 박차CN台股狂飆財富效應兩極化 消費產業冷熱不均KRLS일렉트릭, 인피니언과 AI 데이터센터 위한 DC 전력 기술 공동 개발KR크래프톤 '미메시스', 글로벌 누적 판매량 200만 장 돌파
Newsgather
GeriDelhi court denies interim protection to Indian Polo Association, paving way for eviction
Delhi court denies interim protection to Indian Polo Association, paving way for eviction
Gelişiyor
Economic Times13.06.2026Law4 dk okumaIndia

Delhi court denies interim protection to Indian Polo Association, paving way for eviction

Hızlı Bakış

  • A Delhi court has refused to grant interim protection to the Indian Polo Association (IPA) against the Centre's order to vacate the Jaipur Polo Ground.
  • Officials have already taken physical possession of the 15.20-acre land.
  • The court cited previous rejections of similar requests and judicial discipline.

Yapay zekâ özeti

Neden Önemli?

The Centre ordered the Indian Polo Association (IPA) to vacate the Jaipur Polo Ground, a 15.20-acre land in Delhi. The IPA sought interim protection from a Delhi court, but its plea was rejected.

Yazı boyutu

A Delhi court has refused to grant interim protection to the Indian Polo Association (IPA) against the Centre's order directing it to vacate the Jaipur Polo Ground.

The order dated June 12 was posted on the court website on Saturday as officials of the Land and Development Office under the Union Housing and Urban Affairs Ministry took physical possession of the 15.20-acre Jaipur Polo Ground.

Additional Sessions Judge Dhirender Rana was hearing an application filed by the IPA under Section 9(3) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, seeking a stay on the enforcement and execution of the eviction order by the central government.

In its order, the court said, "A similar kind of request was moved before the Learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, PHC and Delhi High Court, and no relief was granted to the appellant. Therefore, keeping in view judicial discipline and propriety, I am not inclined to stay the execution of the impugned order even till next date".

The court, however, directed the Union government to file replies to the appeal and the stay application and listed the matter before the vacation judge on June 17.

The dispute pertains to the Jaipur Polo Ground situated in Lutyens' Delhi. The Centre has informed the courts that the land occupied by the polo ground and nearby establishments, including the Delhi Gymkhana Club, is proposed to be taken over for public purposes.

Appearing for the Union government, its standing counsel Ashish Dixit sought time to file replies to the appeal as well as the stay application.

However, senior advocate Akshay Makhija along with other counsel, representing the IPA, opposed the Centre's request for adjournment to file its reply and urged the court to restrain authorities from executing the eviction order till the next date of hearing, contending that otherwise the appeal itself would become infructuous.

The court noted that the appeal against the eviction order dated May 20 was filed on June 3 and notice had already been issued to the respondent, without any interim stay being granted at that stage.

"Since advance copy of the application was not supplied, arguments on the application cannot be heard as the respondent has a right to file reply to the application and thereafter only, application for stay can be disposed of," the court said.

The court noted that the IPA had subsequently approached the Delhi High Court through a writ petition where a prayer for ad-interim stay of the eviction order was also made, but no interim protection was granted.

"The petition was disposed of by observing that the District and Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, would decide the stay application filed along with the appeal," the order said.

The court also referred to the Delhi High Court's observation that there was no imminent execution of the eviction till June 12.

Rejecting the request for temporary protection till the next hearing, the court said, "Keeping in view the judicial discipline and propriety, I am not inclined to stay the execution of the impugned order even till next date."

The IPA termed the eviction "wrongful, arbitrary and contrary to law," and said it would pursue all available legal remedies to safeguard its rights and interests.

"As the matter is sub judice and ongoing, the Association does not propose to comment further at this stage," said IPA counsel, Major (Retd) Nirvikar Singh.

Earlier on June 8, the Delhi High Court expressed concern about the fate of the heritage structures in such properties, and lamented the construction of high-rises in the capital amid rising pollution.

"Delhi will suffocate. Whatever little breather we have in the NDMC area, that is going to go. We will all suffocate and die," Justice Krishna orally said. The court also observed that the government did not feel the need to take over the land in 200 years, and asked if making high-rises was in public interest.

"What are you going to make Delhi into? Delhi people go to chhota-mota mountain and stay there. It is a small lung that we have and you want to take away that also. Ensure that people stop coming to Delhi.

"We have only highrises all over. All two-storey buildings are gone. Every colony has been demolished. If this is how you want Delhi to live, then God help us," the court orally remarked during the hearing.

Bundan Sonra Ne Olabilir?

Yapay zekâ öngörüsü — kesinlik taşımaz

  • Indian Polo Association will pursue further legal remedies to safeguard its rights.

    Çok muhtemel · Haftalar içinde

Açık Sorular

  • What public purpose is the land designated for?
  • What are the IPA's next legal steps?
  • What is the fate of other establishments on the land?

İlgili Konular

Bu haber ilk olarak şurada yayınlandı: Economic Times.

İlgili Haberler

Bu konuda daha fazlaIndian Polo Association