Son Dakika
CN水上飛機紐約東河緊急迫降 8人獲救2人輕傷CN中聯油脂沙拉油驗出致癌物超標 賴清德提4原則 藍營批政府失能RUФрагменты БПЛА упали в Ленинградской областиTRTürkiye Geneli Hava Durumu: Kuvvetli Yağış ve Rüzgar UyarısıCN“单身”女主播设局 乐清警方破获情感诈骗案 涉案金额超500万RUФинляндия временно ограничила авиасообщение в восточной части Финского заливаDEGesetz zur Finanzreform der Krankenkassen: Ministerin Warken nimmt Änderungen vorKR대한항공, 2천억 엔 규모 사무라이본드 발행 성공…정책금융 7천억 확보CN《紙上城市插畫展》在桃園中原文創園區登場,打造沉浸式心靈探索之旅KR조지훈 전주시장, 시민 안전 최우선 현장 중심 신속 대응 체계 구축 주문CN水上飛機紐約東河緊急迫降 8人獲救2人輕傷CN中聯油脂沙拉油驗出致癌物超標 賴清德提4原則 藍營批政府失能RUФрагменты БПЛА упали в Ленинградской областиTRTürkiye Geneli Hava Durumu: Kuvvetli Yağış ve Rüzgar UyarısıCN“单身”女主播设局 乐清警方破获情感诈骗案 涉案金额超500万RUФинляндия временно ограничила авиасообщение в восточной части Финского заливаDEGesetz zur Finanzreform der Krankenkassen: Ministerin Warken nimmt Änderungen vorKR대한항공, 2천억 엔 규모 사무라이본드 발행 성공…정책금융 7천억 확보CN《紙上城市插畫展》在桃園中原文創園區登場,打造沉浸式心靈探索之旅KR조지훈 전주시장, 시민 안전 최우선 현장 중심 신속 대응 체계 구축 주문
Newsgather
GeriEU exploring joint funding for military capabilities
EU exploring joint funding for military capabilities
Gelişiyor
Politico EU10.06.2026Defense3 dk okuma

EU exploring joint funding for military capabilities

Hızlı Bakış

  • EU defense chief Andrius Kubilius is proposing a new initiative for member states to jointly fund military capabilities, such as air-to-air refueling, currently provided by the U.S.
  • The estimated cost is €500 billion, with potential obstacles including national procurement concerns and U.S. resistance.

Yapay zekâ özeti

Neden Önemli?

EU defense chief Andrius Kubilius is exploring a new initiative for countries to jointly fund military capabilities like air-to-air refueling, currently provided by the U.S. This comes amid concerns over US commitment to NATO and the need for Europe to develop its own strategic enablers.

Yazı boyutu

BRUSSELS — EU defense chief Andrius Kubilius is exploring a new initiative for countries to jointly fund military capabilities like air-to-air refueling now provided by the U.S., three European Parliament officials told POLITICO.

Under the scheme, governments interested in joining could voluntarily devote a share of the higher defense budgets approved last year by NATO countries to jointly develop battlefield kit that helps sustain military operations, the people said, adding that the EU could then help interested countries with procurement.

The U.S. currently provides most of NATO’s so-called strategic enablers, which also include military command and control systems, space-based intelligence, satellite reconnaissance and battlefield logistics platforms.

Kubilius on Tuesday proposed that member states agree “that they will spend some of part of their national defense money” to replace the U.S. enablers. He estimated that the full cost of doing so would be about €500 billion.

“It's absolutely clear that we shall not be able to finance [it] from the next [EU long-term budget],” he said.

Washington last month gave its NATO allies a detailed list of military assets it no longer wanted to make available to the alliance; the list included long-range reconnaissance drones and KC-135 airborne tankers. That added to existing worries over U.S. commitment to NATO under President Donald Trump.

“We need … to find ways how we can become much more effective in creating in Europe joint projects in conventional defense, especially on so-called strategic enablers, where we are quite heavily dependent on American resources,” Kubilius said last week ahead of a meeting of EU defense ministers in Cyprus.

Kubilius agreed to take the idea forward during a private meeting last week with 16 MEPs in Brussels who form the European Defence Union Group, which advocates for closer EU defense integration, two of the officials said. The initiative remains in very early stages, and it is unclear whether it would end up as a legal proposal or a more informal encouragement.

“We all know strategic enablers are a priority and we agreed to work on this together,” said one of the officials, adding that MEPs would discuss the idea in more detail next week.

However, the initiative is likely to run into obstacles, including capitals being cautious about giving Brussels a say over procurement, U.S. resistance to losing key arms sales in Europe, and the need to develop and build equipment at speed to deter Russia.

The European Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank, last week said the Commission must launch a short-term procurement drive focused on delivering these capabilities immediately where possible, paired with a medium-term industrial strategy to develop more complex technologies.

“If development does not start now, Europe will still be dependent on American systems in the mid-2030s,” it stated in a report.

Developing joint capabilities will also come at a steep cost — a challenge for many European countries struggling with high debt and the impact of the energy crisis linked to the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran.

The Kiel Institute, a think tank, last month estimated that replacing U.S. command and control systems, satellite reconnaissance, communications and navigation assets, space launch infrastructure, aerial reconnaissance like early warning radars, military cloud software and AI, electronic warfare systems and strategic airlift capabilities would cost Europe a minimum of €200 billion and take a decade or more.

Other experts argue the overall cost of substituting U.S. non-nuclear military capabilities on the continent would be about $1 trillion.

Bundan Sonra Ne Olabilir?

Yapay zekâ öngörüsü — kesinlik taşımaz

  • MEPs will discuss the initiative in more detail next week.

    Çok muhtemel · Günler içinde

  • The initiative will face obstacles related to national procurement, US resistance, and the need for speed to deter Russia.

    Çok muhtemel · Orta vadede

  • Europe will remain dependent on American systems in the mid-2030s if development does not start now.

    Muhtemel · Uzun vadede

Açık Sorular

  • What will be the final legal or informal structure of the initiative?
  • How will national procurement concerns be addressed?
  • What will be the US reaction to potential loss of arms sales?
  • How will the high costs be managed given existing national debts and the energy crisis?

İlgili Konular

Bu haber ilk olarak şurada yayınlandı: Politico EU.

İlgili Haberler

Bu konuda daha fazlamilitary capabilities