Son Dakika
ESAviso amarillo por tormentas en Madrid este martesESHacienda remite el borrador de la reforma de financiación a las comunidades esta semanaESTrump pide a la FIFA revisar tarjeta roja a Folarin BalogunESMinistros italianos defienden a Meloni tras ataque de TrumpESBrasil, eliminada del Mundial: Ancelotti y Neymar, señalados en la crisis del 'scratch'ESElecciones en CEOE: Apoyos divididos para la reelección de Antonio GaramendiESEl PP pregunta a Hacienda si ha investigado a David Sánchez tras el informe de la Agencia TributariaESTragedia familiar en la A-67: Muere el director de Dehesa de los Canónigos, su mujer y dos hijos en accidenteESEva Orúe cesa como directora de la Feria del Libro de MadridESVox sospecha de "fraude electoral" por la "ley de nietos" y pide excluir a los nacionalizados del votoESAviso amarillo por tormentas en Madrid este martesESHacienda remite el borrador de la reforma de financiación a las comunidades esta semanaESTrump pide a la FIFA revisar tarjeta roja a Folarin BalogunESMinistros italianos defienden a Meloni tras ataque de TrumpESBrasil, eliminada del Mundial: Ancelotti y Neymar, señalados en la crisis del 'scratch'ESElecciones en CEOE: Apoyos divididos para la reelección de Antonio GaramendiESEl PP pregunta a Hacienda si ha investigado a David Sánchez tras el informe de la Agencia TributariaESTragedia familiar en la A-67: Muere el director de Dehesa de los Canónigos, su mujer y dos hijos en accidenteESEva Orúe cesa como directora de la Feria del Libro de MadridESVox sospecha de "fraude electoral" por la "ley de nietos" y pide excluir a los nacionalizados del voto
Newsgather
GeriExperts Discuss New Glenn Rocket Failure's Impact on NASA's Moon Missions
Experts Discuss New Glenn Rocket Failure's Impact on NASA's Moon Missions
Gelişiyor
Ars Technica4 g önceUzay2 dk okumaUnited States

Experts Discuss New Glenn Rocket Failure's Impact on NASA's Moon Missions

Hızlı Bakış

  • Space industry experts discussed the catastrophic failure of Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket and its potential delay for NASA's Artemis IV Moon mission.
  • The 9x4 variant, needed for human landings, faces significant development hurdles.

Yapay zekâ özeti

Neden Önemli?

Ars Technica hosted a discussion with space industry experts regarding the explosion of the New Glenn rocket and its implications for NASA's Artemis IV mission.

Yazı boyutu

This week Ars hosted a live discussion with two space industry experts about the aftermath of the catastrophic explosion of the New Glenn rocket in late May.

Along with Ars Technica Space Editor Eric Berger; the director of research at Quilty Space, Caleb Henry; and the host of the Main Engine Cut Off podcast, Anthony Colangelo, spoke about various topics. Chief among them was the implications of this failure for NASA’s attempt to land humans on the Moon for the Artemis IV mission. Blue Origin and SpaceX are both building landers to support this goal and the rockets to deliver them to the Moon.

During the conversation, Berger reported that the current Blue Origin “architecture” for a human mission would require four launches of new variant of the New Glenn rocket, known as 9×4, because it has nine first stage engines, and four upper stage engines. This is a more powerful version than the “7×2″ variant that exploded a little more than a month ago. Blue Origin has not set a target date for the 9×4 rocket’s debut, but some sources have indicated the company is targeting late 2027 or early 2028.

How realistic is this, especially after the destruction of Launch Complex 36A? Caleb Henry said he was not optimistic.

I have not seen anyone put out a date for a new rocket, and actually hit it. Going back in the archives, when Blue Origin shifted New Glenn from a three-stage vehicle to a two-stage vehicle, and made a couple other changes in mid-2018 time period, those were stated as being needed to accelerate the path to launch. They had yet to make a first flight, and they were doing these architectural changes so that they could speed up that timeline. I think the 9×4 is really to enable them to do new missions. I think adding engines makes it more complicated, not less. I don’t have a sense of exactly where they’ll land relative to what they’ve put out there, but I think 1.5 is usually a good rule, so a year and a half at least.

Colangelo said it would not surprise him if the development of the 9×4 variant of New Glenn slipped into the 2030s. So if that’s the case, how is NASA going to get its astronauts to the Moon this decade, if that’s to happen at all?

Bundan Sonra Ne Olabilir?

Yapay zekâ öngörüsü — kesinlik taşımaz

  • The 9x4 variant of New Glenn may slip into the 2030s.

    Olası · Yıllar içinde

  • Blue Origin's 9x4 debut could be at least 1.5 years away.

    Muhtemel · Aylar içinde

Açık Sorular

  • When will the 9x4 variant debut?
  • Can NASA meet its Moon landing goals without Blue Origin's lander?
  • What are the long-term consequences of the explosion?

İlgili Konular

Bu haber ilk olarak şurada yayınlandı: Ars Technica.

İlgili Haberler

Bu konuda daha fazlaNew Glenn