Son Dakika
ITForti esplosioni a Kiev durante un'allerta missilistica: almeno 11 mortiARتجدد الاشتباكات في شمال مالي وهجمات متزامنة تستهدف مواقع عسكريةKR전태일 정신 계승 청계피복노조, 진실화해위에 진상규명 신청TRMotosiklet Kazasında Ağır Yaralanan Sürücü Hayatını KaybettiKRSeoul shares end lower as foreigners sell stocks ahead of earningsITMonopattini in sharing, le imprese: "Regole contro di noi, aumentano i costi"ITCina: Lancio di prova di missile strategico da sottomarinoITOperazione "King George": 16 arresti e 1,1 milioni di euro di beni sequestrati per traffico di drogaJPスズキ、輸入車新規登録台数で初の首位に躍進 - メルセデス・ベンツを抜くCNFuneral procession for Iran's late supreme leader Ali Khamenei begins in TehranITForti esplosioni a Kiev durante un'allerta missilistica: almeno 11 mortiARتجدد الاشتباكات في شمال مالي وهجمات متزامنة تستهدف مواقع عسكريةKR전태일 정신 계승 청계피복노조, 진실화해위에 진상규명 신청TRMotosiklet Kazasında Ağır Yaralanan Sürücü Hayatını KaybettiKRSeoul shares end lower as foreigners sell stocks ahead of earningsITMonopattini in sharing, le imprese: "Regole contro di noi, aumentano i costi"ITCina: Lancio di prova di missile strategico da sottomarinoITOperazione "King George": 16 arresti e 1,1 milioni di euro di beni sequestrati per traffico di drogaJPスズキ、輸入車新規登録台数で初の首位に躍進 - メルセデス・ベンツを抜くCNFuneral procession for Iran's late supreme leader Ali Khamenei begins in Tehran
Newsgather
GeriNearly 10% of Bitcoin Supply Vulnerable to Quantum Computing Threat
Nearly 10% of Bitcoin Supply Vulnerable to Quantum Computing Threat
Gelişiyor
Cointelegraph20.05.2026Crypto3 dk okuma

Nearly 10% of Bitcoin Supply Vulnerable to Quantum Computing Threat

Hızlı Bakış

  • Glassnode reports nearly 10% of Bitcoin's supply (1.92 million BTC) is structurally unsafe from quantum computing, including early Satoshi-era coins and Taproot addresses.
  • While 70% is safe, 20.6% is operationally unsafe due to key management issues.
  • Major entities like Franklin Templeton and Binance show significant exposure.

Yapay zekâ özeti

Neden Önemli?

A significant portion of Bitcoin's supply is identified as structurally or operationally unsafe from potential quantum computing breakthroughs. This vulnerability stems from the way public keys are revealed in certain transaction types, making them susceptible to future decryption by advanced quantum computers. While the threat is not immediate, the long-term security of Bitcoin is being questioned.

Yazı boyutu

Nearly 10% of the total Bitcoin supply is considered “structurally unsafe” from a quantum computing breakthrough, as their output type reveals the public key by design, regardless of address management practices, according to data analytics platform Glassnode.

Totaling about 1.92 million Bitcoin (BTC), the group includes BTC from early Satoshi-era Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK) outputs, legacy multi-sig structures such as Pay-to-Multisig (P2MS) and modern Pay-to-Taproot (P2TR) outputs, which reveal the public key or public key-equivalent by design, wrote Glassnode in a Wednesday X post.

Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto’s coins represent about 1.1 million or 5.5% of the vulnerable supply, following another 620,000 Satoshi-era coins or 3.1% of the supply and about 200,000 coins or 1% of the supply in Taproot addresses.

Choosing how to implement PQC [post-quantum cryptography] and deploy it on-chain should remain decoupled from the question of what to do about coins that remain quantum vulnerable. Yet the two matters often are conflated, the controversy around the latter often clouding discussions of the former - ARK Invest

The findings underscore the need to implement a quantum-proof path for Bitcoin, such as the adoption of BIP-360's proposed Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR) output type, which seeks to remove Taproot’s quantum-vulnerable key path spend, though it does not itself add post-quantum digital signatures.

While 9.6% of the total supply remains structurally exposed, a significant part of this exposure “could be reduced if wallet infrastructure, address standards, and user behavior evolve,” added Glassnode.

However, this supply would only be vulnerable to quantum theft if quantum computers can break Bitcoin’s elliptic curve cryptography (ECC), which would require about 2,330 logical qubits and tens of millions to billions of quantum gates, according to a March white paper published by US investment manager Ark Invest.

Source: Glassnode

Nearly 70% of Bitcoin’s supply is safe from quantum computing threat

Glassnode estimates that about 13.99 million Bitcoin, representing 69.8% of the total supply, remain unexposed to a quantum computing threat, which is largely in line with Ark Invest’s figures, which show that 65% of the supply was safe, Cointelegraph reported in March.

Still, the analytics provider notes that about 4.12 million BTC, or 20.6% of the total supply, are “operationally unsafe,” meaning that these coins are exposed due to a key or address management issue.

Source: Glassnode

Entity-level data shows that the holdings of some large corporate entities are exposed. This includes 100% of BTC held by Franklin Templeton, WisdomTree and Robinhood, 99% of neobank Revolut’s Bitcoin, 52% of Grayscale’s holdings and just 2% of Fidelity’s Bitcoin stash.

Related: Bernstein says Bitcoin market already priced in quantum risk

Looking at the exposed tokens of cryptocurrency exchanges, only about 5% of BTC held on Coinbase is exposed, compared to 85% of Binance’s BTC and about 100% of the holdings on Bitfinex exchange.

To reduce exposure, exchanges and custodians are advised to reduce key reuse, improve address hygiene and plan a migration into a quantum-proof format to position for a future quantum breakthrough, wrote Glassnode.

Bundan Sonra Ne Olabilir?

Yapay zekâ öngörüsü — kesinlik taşımaz

  • Wallet infrastructure, address standards, and user behavior will evolve to reduce quantum vulnerability.

    Muhtemel · Aylar içinde

  • The Bitcoin network will see proposals and adoption of quantum-proof output types.

    Muhtemel · Aylar içinde

Açık Sorular

  • When will quantum computers be powerful enough to break Bitcoin's current cryptography?
  • What is the timeline for implementing quantum-proof solutions on the Bitcoin network?
  • How will user behavior and wallet infrastructure adapt to mitigate quantum risks?
  • What is the exact cost and complexity of migrating vulnerable Bitcoin holdings to quantum-proof formats?

İlgili Konular

Bu haber ilk olarak şurada yayınlandı: Cointelegraph.

İlgili Haberler

Bu konuda daha fazlabitcoin