عاجل
CN巴威颱風來襲 高公局:國道6處高架路段將視風雨暫時封閉ITOndata di caldo record sull'Italia: bollino rosso per Firenze e Perugia, rischio Vibrio nelle acqueRUСША атаковали ракетами мост, связывающий Иран с Россией и КитаемITArrestati due ex 007 italiani per spionaggio a favore della RussiaDEEinigung im Tarifstreit an Unikliniken im SüdwestenTRMotorine 2-3 TL Zam Geliyor: Fiyatlar 70 TL'yi AşacakCN上海愚园路现AI新风景 智能终端产业规模预计达3000亿TRABD, İran'da Demiryolu Köprüsünü Vurdu: Seferler Askıya AlındıCN強颱巴威將襲 鄭明典:北海岸、東北部午夜前後有小陣雨及陣風ARالمغرب وفرنسا في افتتاح ربع نهائي مونديال 2026CN巴威颱風來襲 高公局:國道6處高架路段將視風雨暫時封閉ITOndata di caldo record sull'Italia: bollino rosso per Firenze e Perugia, rischio Vibrio nelle acqueRUСША атаковали ракетами мост, связывающий Иран с Россией и КитаемITArrestati due ex 007 italiani per spionaggio a favore della RussiaDEEinigung im Tarifstreit an Unikliniken im SüdwestenTRMotorine 2-3 TL Zam Geliyor: Fiyatlar 70 TL'yi AşacakCN上海愚园路现AI新风景 智能终端产业规模预计达3000亿TRABD, İran'da Demiryolu Köprüsünü Vurdu: Seferler Askıya AlındıCN強颱巴威將襲 鄭明典:北海岸、東北部午夜前後有小陣雨及陣風ARالمغرب وفرنسا في افتتاح ربع نهائي مونديال 2026
Newsgather
BackConsumer court orders refund and compensation for summer camp over unhygienic conditions
Consumer court orders refund and compensation for summer camp over unhygienic conditions
خبر
Times of India17.06.2026Law3 dk okumaIndia

Consumer court orders refund and compensation for summer camp over unhygienic conditions

نظرة سريعة

  • A Hyderabad consumer court ordered summer camp organizers to refund fees with interest and pay compensation to three children due to unhygienic and unsafe conditions.
  • The camp failed to provide promised AC accommodation, hygienic food, and medical facilities, leading to issues like contaminated water and denied communication.

ملخص مُنشأ بالذكاء الاصطناعي

لماذا يهم

Three children and their fathers filed a complaint against summer camp organizers for allegedly keeping children in unhygienic and unsafe conditions, failing to provide promised facilities.

حجم الخط

AI generated image

NEW DELHI: A consumer court in Hyderabad has directed the summer camp organisers to refund camp fees with interest and pay compensation to three children, after their parents alleged that the children were kept in unhygienic and unsafe conditions. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-III, Hyderabad, passed the order on a complaint filed by three children and their fathers, against the summer camp organisers, managing director, and the camp venue, Kanha Shanti Vanam in Ranga Reddy district, Telangana.

What was the issue? The three children had enrolled in the "25th All India Residential Summer Camp," held at Kanha Shanti Vanam from May 3 to May 22, 2025, for children aged between 8 and 18. Digital ads and brochures for the camp promised AC accommodation, hygienic food, 24x7 medical facilities, security, separate housing for boys and girls, trained dorm parents, and emergency communication with parents. The fathers of the three children paid Rs 56,000 and Rs 55,000 each — Rs 1,66,000 in total — to enrol. As per the complaint filed, the camp did not have the facilities it mentioned in its brochures. The children's drinking water reportedly contained lizards and insects, the promised nutritious food was replaced with instant noodles, dormitories were overcrowded, children faced bullying that staff allegedly ignored, sick children weren't given proper medical care, and they were denied communication with their parents even during emergencies. Laundry facilities were also unhygienic enough to cause skin rashes, the complaint said. After being told that their children were unwell, parents visited the camp and found that the condition was very unsafe for the minor children there and decided to withdraw their children within a few days and asked for a refund, which the organisers refused to give. The parents then approached the consumer commission, seeking a refund with 18 per cent interest, Rs 5,00,000 in compensation for each child, and Rs 50,000 in litigation costs.

What did the commission say? The commission said that whatever the camp promised in its brochure like hygienic food, safe accommodation, medical care, and proper supervision wasn't just advertising and it was treated as a real promise the camp had to keep. Since the camp failed to provide these things, the commission said this counted as poor service under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. It also said that promising one set of facilities through ads but delivering something completely different was a way of misleading and cheating customers, which the law treats as an unfair trade practice. "The actual conditions at the camp were contrary to the promises made in the brochure and advertisements. Hence, the acts of the Opposite Parties also amount to unfair trade practice under Section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019," the commission said

The organisers were sent notice but never responded or appeared before the commission, and the case proceeded without their side being heard. "Though notice was served, the Opposite Parties failed to contest the matter and did not choose to rebut the allegations made by the complainants. Therefore, an adverse inference is liable to be drawn against them," the commission added. Citing a Supreme Court ruling, the commission said compensation under the act should "adequately compensate consumers for harassment, mental agony and suffering," and, citing another precedent, noted that an award of interest was justified since money had been wrongfully held back by the organisers. The commission directed the organisers to refund Rs 1,66,000 to the fathers with 12 per cent annual interest from May 5, 2025 — lower than the 18 per cent the complainants had sought — and to pay Rs 50,000 in compensation to each of the three children, amounting to Rs 1,50,000 in total. The organisers were also told to pay Rs 15,000 towards litigation costs, with the entire amount to be paid within 45 days.

End of Article

أسئلة مفتوحة

  • Will the organizers comply with the court order?
  • What are the specific reasons for the organizers' non-response?

مواضيع ذات صلة

This article was originally published by Times of India.

أخبار ذات صلة

Same-sex couple challenges Income Tax Act provision in Bombay High Court
يتطور·5 sa önce

Same-sex couple challenges Income Tax Act provision in Bombay High Court

A same-sex couple has filed a petition in the Bombay High Court challenging Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, which exempts gifts between spouses from tax. They argue that denying this benefit to same-sex couples is discriminatory as Indian law does not recognize their relationships as marriages. The Income Tax Department opposes the plea, calling it "misconceived" and an attempt to use tax law for marriage recognition.

Times of India
المزيد حول هذا الموضوعconsumer court