Newsgather

privileges committee

مستقر18 خبر3 مصادرآخر تحديث: 29.04.2026

أحدث الأخبار

PMQs to be final session of 2024-26 parliament as government wins vote on Badenoch motion
سياسة
29.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

PMQs to be final session of 2024-26 parliament as government wins vote on Badenoch motion

PMQs takes place today as the final session of the 2024-26 parliamentary session. The government comfortably won Kemi Badenoch's vote to refer Keir Starmer to the privileges committee. Fifteen Labour MPs rebelled by voting with Badenoch, while 53 did not take part in the division. Housing secretary Steve Reed played down the prospect of the rebels losing the whip, calling them a handful of usual suspects.

G
Guardian UK
Starmer sees off major Labour rebellion over call for Mandelson inquiry
خبر
28.04.2026

Starmer sees off major Labour rebellion over call for Mandelson inquiry

No 10 deploys full weight to block parliamentary inquiry bid as MPs warn PM running out of political capitalKeir Starmer has seen off a major Labour rebellion over a bid to force a parliamentary investigation into his appointment of Peter Mandelson, but many of his own MPs warned he was running out of political capital.After Downing Street deployed its full weight to force Labour MPs to block a referral to the privileges committee over the scandal, some angrily accused Starmer of leaving them facing accusations of a “cover-up”. Continue reading...

G
Guardian UK
Ed Davey accuses Starmer of cowardice over Privileges Committee vote
يتطور
سياسة·28.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

Ed Davey accuses Starmer of cowardice over Privileges Committee vote

Ed Davey has accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer of cowardice after Labour MPs were whipped to vote against referring him to the Privileges Committee over Peter Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador. The government won the vote 335 to 223, with opposition parties including the Liberal Democrats, SNP and Reform uniting in favour of the referral. Some Labour backbenchers expressed anger at being placed in a position where they would appear complicit in a cover-up.

G
Guardian UK
Starmer survives privileges committee vote as 15 Labour MPs defy whip
يتطور
سياسة·28.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

Starmer survives privileges committee vote as 15 Labour MPs defy whip

MPs have voted 335-223 to reject a Conservative motion to refer Prime Minister Keir Starmer to the Privileges Committee over allegations he misled Parliament about Peter Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador. Fifteen Labour MPs defied a three-line whip to support the Conservative-led motion. The government won by a majority of 112, with Starmer absent chairing the Middle East response committee. The vote followed a heated debate with allegations of a cover-up and comparisons to Boris Johnson's own privileges committee battle.

G
Guardian UK
Starmer avoids parliamentary investigation after MPs reject motion over Mandelson US ambassador appointment
يتطور
سياسة·28.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

Starmer avoids parliamentary investigation after MPs reject motion over Mandelson US ambassador appointment

Sir Keir Starmer will not face a parliamentary investigation after MPs rejected a Conservative motion to refer him to the Privileges Committee over claims he misled Parliament about the appointment of Lord Mandelson as US ambassador. The government secured victory after summoning Labour MPs campaigning in Scotland back to Westminster. Some Labour MPs criticized the handling, with one saying it risks looking like a 'cover-up'. Lord Mandelson was sacked in September 2025 after new information emerged about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

B
BBC UK News
Starmer faces harsh criticism from his own MPs as members debate referring him to privileges committee – UK politics live
خبر
28.04.2026

Starmer faces harsh criticism from his own MPs as members debate referring him to privileges committee – UK politics live

Commons debate underway after Morgan McSweeney tells committee that advising PM to appoint Mandelson was ‘serious error of judgment’Q: Was there pressure on you to approve Mandelson’s vetting?This is a reference to the claim that Keir Starmer misled MPs last week when he talked about no pressure being placed on the Foreign Office.One is during my tenure. I was not aware of any pressure on the substance of the Mandelson DV case.Question two was there pressure? Absolutely. And I’ve described it. And I also have seen what the Foreign Office said to you last night. [See 8.50am.]I didn’t receive any direct calls from the chief of staff during my time as permanent undersecretary. So there was no call at all. My interactions were always when others were present in a general meeting, there weren’t very many of those either …I’ve really racked my brains and I cannot recall Morgan McSweeney swearing in a meeting at me, or indeed just in general. So I don’t see any substance in that part of it and I think it’s important I say that this morning, given how many people have come to think that might be true. Continue reading...

G
Guardian UK
Badenoch and Davey join forces to demand Starmer face privileges committee over Mandelson vetting claims
يتطور
سياسة·28.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

Badenoch and Davey join forces to demand Starmer face privileges committee over Mandelson vetting claims

Kemi Badenoch and Ed Davey have teamed up in the Commons to pressure Keir Starmer to face a parliamentary probe over his claims about Peter Mandelson's security vetting. Badenoch led a motion calling for Starmer to be referred to the privileges committee, accusing him of misleading parliament over the appointment of Mandelson as ambassador to the US before vetting was complete. The Conservative leader accused Labour MPs of being "whipped" to exonerate Starmer before facts were tested, while Ed Davey drew laughs by comparing the situation to Boris Johnson's similar motion.

G
Guardian UK
Badenoch accuses Labour MPs of acting like 'sheep' as she opens debate on referring PM to privileges committee
مُلِح
سياسة·28.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

Badenoch accuses Labour MPs of acting like 'sheep' as she opens debate on referring PM to privileges committee

Kemi Badenoch has opened a Commons debate on referring Prime Minister Keir Starmer to the privileges committee over claims he misled Parliament about the vetting process for Peter Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador. Badenoch accused Labour MPs of acting like 'sheep' for dismissing the debate as a 'stunt'. Meanwhile, Morgan McSweeney, the PM's chief of staff, testified before the foreign affairs committee about the Mandelson appointment, the theft of his phone, and claims he put pressure on officials to lower vetting standards.

G
Guardian UK
No 10 publishes previously confidential memo to refute claim that Starmer misled MPs over Mandelson appointment – as it happened
خبر
27.04.2026

No 10 publishes previously confidential memo to refute claim that Starmer misled MPs over Mandelson appointment – as it happened

Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle earlier confirmed that MPs will decide whether to let inquiry into Keir Starmer’s statements over Peter Mandelson proceedDowning Street has said that the UK is “in a good position” to handle the global supply problems caused by the Iran war not being resolved.Speaking at the morning lobby briefing, the PM’s spokesperson said:We remain focused on a long-term, permanent solution to the crisis. As a result of the forward-planning, the government undertook over the past few months, the UK is in a good position.We’re ramping up planning for all different potential impacts on the UK economy and consumers, and that means focusing on a live monitoring of stock levels and what plans are in place for addressing supply chain disruption.Even Boris Johnson didn’t block his MPs voting for scrutiny. Labour MPs must be given a free vote on any motion to refer Starmer to the privileges committee, not forced into being accomplices to a cover-up.If Keir Starmer has misled the House and the public, he must be held to the same standard that we should expect of any prime minister. Continue reading...

G
Guardian UK
MPs to debate Tory motion calling for privileges committee inquiry into Starmer
يتطور
سياسة·27.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

MPs to debate Tory motion calling for privileges committee inquiry into Starmer

Speaker Lindsay Hoyle has confirmed MPs will debate a Tory motion tomorrow calling for the privileges committee to investigate whether Keir Starmer misled parliament about the Peter Mandelson vetting process. Former PM Gordon Brown has urged Labour MPs to support Starmer, with the government working to defeat the motion backed by a three-line whip. The debate follows publication of a cabinet office memo stating appropriate processes were followed in Mandelson's appointment. Meanwhile, progress is reported in the Birmingham bin strike, with a settlement now within sight.

G
Guardian UK
Hoyle allows MPs to vote tomorrow on Tory call for privileges committee inquiry into Starmer
يتطور
سياسة·27.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

Hoyle allows MPs to vote tomorrow on Tory call for privileges committee inquiry into Starmer

Commons speaker Lindsay Hoyle has confirmed MPs will debate and vote tomorrow on Kemi Badenoch's motion to refer Keir Starmer to the privileges committee over claims the PM misled parliament about Peter Mandelson's appointment as Washington ambassador. Hoyle received letters from various MPs including the opposition leader and, after taking advice, decided to let MPs decide. Badenoch claims the case against Starmer is 'overwhelming' and that he appointed a 'national security risk.' Downing Street called it a 'desperate political stunt' the week before local elections.

G
Guardian UK
Starmer faces vote on standards investigation over Mandelson appointment
يتطور
سياسة·27.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

Starmer faces vote on standards investigation over Mandelson appointment

Speaker Lindsay Hoyle has granted a debate on Tuesday on potentially referring Prime Minister Keir Starmer to the privileges committee over claims he misled the Commons about the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington. The vote follows the Guardian's revelation that Mandelson was installed despite vetting officials advising he be denied security clearance. The Conservatives accuse Starmer of misleading MPs when he said 'full due process' had been followed and that there was 'no pressure whatsoever' applied on the Foreign Office. Government whips are considering instructing Labour MPs to oppose any referral, though some Labour MPs may side with opposition.

G
Guardian UK
Starmer to chair Cobra meeting on Iran war economic fallout tomorrow – UK politics live
خبر
27.04.2026

Starmer to chair Cobra meeting on Iran war economic fallout tomorrow – UK politics live

Meeting could coincide with possible Commons debate on claims he lied to MPs about Mandelson’s vettingDowning Street has said that the UK is “in a good position” to handle the global supply problems caused by the Iran war not being resolved.Speaking at the morning lobby briefing, the PM’s spokesperson said:We remain focused on a long-term, permanent solution to the crisis. As a result of the forward-planning, the government undertook over the past few months, the UK is in a good position.We’re ramping up planning for all different potential impacts on the UK economy and consumers, and that means focusing on a live monitoring of stock levels and what plans are in place for addressing supply chain disruption.Even Boris Johnson didn’t block his MPs voting for scrutiny. Labour MPs must be given a free vote on any motion to refer Starmer to the privileges committee, not forced into being accomplices to a cover-up.If Keir Starmer has misled the House and the public, he must be held to the same standard that we should expect of any prime minister. Continue reading...

G
Guardian UK
Call for vote on inquiry into claims Starmer lied over Mandelson dismissed by Labour allies – UK politics live
خبر
27.04.2026

Call for vote on inquiry into claims Starmer lied over Mandelson dismissed by Labour allies – UK politics live

Emily Thornberry says foreign affairs committee already looking into issue and more documents are due to be publishedGood morning. Kemi Badenoch is trying to get Lindsay Hoyle, the speaker, to give MPs a vote on a proposal to get the Commons privileges committee to investigate allegations that Keir Starmer lied to MPs in statements he made to them about the vetting of Peter Mandelson. Other opposition parties may be backing her, but we don’t know for sure because the process is relatively secret; MPs have to write a private letter to the speaker, who then decides whether this is a serious request that should be decided by the Commons as a whole, or a frivolous complaint that should be ignored. (We do know that Karl Turner has written to the speaker about this too, but only because he was daft enough to post his letter on social media last week.) Today we are likely to find out whether or not Hoyle is agreeing to a Commons vote.Boris Johnson was referred to the privileges committee over allegations that he lied to MPs about Partygate (allegations the committee concluded were justified). Badenoch wants to make the case that Starmer is just as dishonest as Johnson. He isn’t, by any stretch, and the claims that Starmer lied to MPs about Mandelson are spurious; they relate to contest intepretations of political language of the kind that are commonplace in parliamentary debate. But the fact that this has even become a live consideration for the speaker is a big win for the Tories.The fact that Kemi Badenoch has changed the accusations she is levelling against the PM on an almost daily basis as her claims have failed to stand up to scrutiny shows what this is really about. This is a nakedly political stunt with no substance ahead of the May elections.Any comparison with Boris Johnson is absurd. When parliament referred that matter to the privileges committee, a police investigation had directly disproved his categoric statements that he knew nothing about the breach of lockdown rules.I suppose our constituents might ask [if a privileges committee goes ahead], have we got the balance right between holding the government to account and seemingly squabbling amongst ourselves when there is so much else going on that perhaps parliament ought to be focusing on as well.I have to say, a really truthful position is, why the rush at the moment? Has it got anything to do with local elections? Continue reading...

G
Guardian UK
Senior Labour figures say call for new Mandelson investigation is a ‘political stunt’
خبر
27.04.2026

Senior Labour figures say call for new Mandelson investigation is a ‘political stunt’

Conservatives expected to push for privileges committee involvement in a Commons vote on MondayA series of senior Labour figures have dismissed calls for a new investigation into what Keir Starmer told MPs about the appointment of Peter Mandelson as political point scoring, before a possible Commons vote on the issue.The Conservatives have called for the cross-party privileges committee, the remit of which includes examining whether MPs broke rules, to look at whether the prime minister misled parliament when he said normal procedures were followed with Mandelson’s appointment. Continue reading...

G
Guardian UK
Former Labour MP urges Speaker to refer Starmer to privileges committee over Mandelson appointment controversy
يتطور
سياسة·23.04.2026ملخص الذكاء الاصطناعي

Former Labour MP urges Speaker to refer Starmer to privileges committee over Mandelson appointment controversy

Former Labour MP Karl Turner has urged the Commons Speaker to refer Prime Minister Keir Starmer to the privileges committee to examine whether he misled parliament over the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington. The controversy stems from conflicting testimony: Starmer claimed during PMQs that no pressure was put on the Foreign Office, quoting former permanent secretary Oliver Robbins, who later told MPs that 'constant pressure' was applied. Robbins was sacked by Starmer last week after being disclosed to have overturned a vetting denial. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and SNP are pushing for a Johnson-style motion allowing all MPs to vote on whether the committee should explore if Starmer was in contempt of parliament.

G
Guardian UK