Newsgather
AtrásIran-Oman Negotiations on Strait of Hormuz Nearing Final Stages Amid US-Iran Tensions
Iran-Oman Negotiations on Strait of Hormuz Nearing Final Stages Amid US-Iran Tensions
En desarrollo
Al Jazeerahace 2 horasPolítica4 min de lectura

Iran-Oman Negotiations on Strait of Hormuz Nearing Final Stages Amid US-Iran Tensions

En resumen

  • Iran's foreign minister announced that negotiations with Oman on a new maritime route through the Strait of Hormuz are nearing finalization.
  • This comes as the US and Israel agreed to halt new attacks on Iran, conditional on a rapid deal to open the strait and end Iran's nuclear threat.

Resumen generado por IA

Por qué importa

The Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil shipping route, has been controlled by Iran since the outbreak of war. A June ceasefire collapsed over shipping routes, and fighting reignited in July.

Tamaño de fuente

Iran’s foreign minister says negotiations with Oman on the Strait of Hormuz are entering their “final stages”, as Tehran insists the vital waterway will never return to its pre-war status.

In a post on Telegram on Sunday, Abbas Araghchi said that in a report he presented to the cabinet, he described the negotiations between Tehran and Muscat as “on the way to being finalised”.

Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, said that Tehran and Muscat were close to reaching a deal on a new maritime route through Hormuz, separate from existing corridors.

“We are now going to reach an understanding on a route acceptable to both sides – neither the northern route nor the southern route – but one that respects the sovereign rights of both sides and safeguards our national interests and security,” Baghaei said in an interview with state television.

Muscat did not immediately comment on the matter.

Both Iran’s and Oman’s territorial waters border the Strait of Hormuz, the key waterway through which about 20 percent of global oil consumption is normally shipped.

Details of the new route were not immediately clear, but Iran has effectively maintained control over the strait since the outbreak of war. On February 28 , the US and Israel launched strikes aimed at destroying Iran’s missile programme, preventing a nuclear weapon and cutting off support for allied armed groups.

A June ceasefire collapsed within weeks in a dispute over shipping routes through Hormuz and fighting reignited in July.

Baghaei earlier said, “an understanding between Iran and Oman on a new route has nothing to do with whether the Strait of Hormuz is reopened or remains closed”. He blamed the US for the closure and accused Washington of breaching its commitments, according to Iran’s Fars news outlet.

“The strait was closed because of the United States’ breach of its commitments, its naval blockade of Iran and all the hostile measures that the United States has taken against the Islamic Republic of Iran during this period,” he said.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Sunday that the memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the US would become the “cornerstone” of Tehran’s future foreign relations.

“We must strive to make the enemy abide by what it signed. The security of our country, the region and our allies will be enhanced by this memorandum,” Pezeshkian said on X.

Hassam Ghashghavi, spokesman for the Iranian parliament’s national security commission, said that mediators were trying to revive the June MoU, and were aware that Hormuz remained the central issue, Iranian news outlet SNN reported.

Ghashghavi said it was possible that an Iranian delegation would travel to Muscat again as part of ongoing diplomacy. “This is the nature of diplomacy and this exchange of views continues regularly,” he said.

Two-sided messaging

The comments come after US President Donald Trump said early on Sunday that the US and Israel had agreed to halt new attacks on Iran, provided a deal to end the months-long conflict is reached “rapidly”.

Trump posted on Truth Social that the US was “locked and loaded and ready to go against the Islamic Republic of Iran”, but Tehran and other Middle Eastern countries asked him to hold off on new attacks.

“Based on this request, I have agreed, for the future benefit of the WORLD and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran, to cancel the attack, subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL.”

Trump said the deal “would include the Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT, and an end to Iran’s nuclear threat”.

“The Country of Israel joins me in this commitment. Get to work, everybody, and get it DONE,” he wrote.

Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman, (MBS) spoke to Trump by phone on Saturday, urging him to “prioritise dialogue” and “reduce escalation”, the Saudi Press Agency reported.

US news website Axios reported that MBS expressed concern over Trump’s plans for large, new attacks against Iran and reportedly urged him to refrain.

“We know that, in a larger context, Iran is habituated to dancing to the same old tune, as it is receiving this oscillating rhetoric from the US president about the possibility of another round of confrontation on the one hand, [while also hearing] statements about these talks going well and that a potential deal is within reach,” said Al Jazeera’s Tohid Asadi, reporting from Tehran.

“In that regard, we know that the Iranian side, at the same time, is responding with the same two-sided message, saying that the road for diplomacy is open on the one hand, [while also maintaining] full preparation for another round,” he added.

Qué observar

Perspectiva de IA — posibilidades, no hechos

  • Iran and Oman are likely to finalize a deal on a new maritime route through the Strait of Hormuz.

    Probable · En semanas

  • An Iranian delegation may travel to Muscat for further diplomatic talks.

    Posible · En semanas

Preguntas abiertas

  • What are the specific terms of the new maritime route between Iran and Oman?
  • What are the details of the 'deal' US President Trump referred to?
  • How will the new route affect existing international maritime law?

Temas relacionados

This article was originally published by Al Jazeera.

Noticias relacionadas

Michigan Senate Primary: AIPAC's Record Spending and the Battle for US-Israel Policy
En desarrollo·hace 1 hora

Michigan Senate Primary: AIPAC's Record Spending and the Battle for US-Israel Policy

The Michigan Democratic Senate primary between Abdul El-Sayed and Haley Stevens is dominated by record spending from pro-Israel groups like AIPAC, exceeding $60M. El-Sayed, critical of Israeli policies, faces a significant financial challenge, highlighting the influence of dark money in US elections and potentially impacting the Democratic Party's stance on Israel.

Al Jazeera
7 min de lectura
Más sobre este temaStrait of Hormuz