CPBL Abolishes '228 Foreign Player Clause', Sets January 15th Negotiation Deadline
L'essentiel
- The Chinese Professional Baseball League (CPBL) has abolished its '228 Foreign Player Clause' and set January 15th as the final negotiation day for existing foreign players.
- Veteran pitcher Wudu, who benefits from the 'Rory Clause' and doesn't count against the foreign player limit, believes these changes will help teams plan their rosters more effectively and contribute to the league's overall growth.
Résumé généré par IA
Pourquoi c'est important
The Chinese Professional Baseball League (CPBL) has abolished its '228 Foreign Player Clause' and set January 15th as the final negotiation day for existing foreign players. This change allows veteran players like Wudu, who has played in Taiwan for many years, to not count against the foreign player limit under the 'Rory Clause'. The league has seen significant improvements in its foreign player regulations over the past 12 years.
伍鐸。（資料照）
〔記者林宥辰／台北報導〕中職昨天領隊會議後，正式宣告規章第17章第96條「228洋將條款」廢除。未來僅配合各隊作業時間，設立1月15日為原球隊議約最終日，該日過後該位外籍選手即被視為自由球員。
味全龍隊老牌洋投伍鐸，生涯效力過中信兄弟、富邦悍將，如今已達成「羅力條款」而不占洋將名額。伍鐸2015年季中來台效力中信兄弟，當時，聯盟洋將還是登錄3人、2人同時上場，只要有洋將降二軍就必須註銷，日後才改為「註冊4人、登錄3人、2人同時上場」。
12年來，中職聯盟對於洋將的規章有進步，伍鐸身為選手頗有感。伍鐸說：「聯盟這幾年爆發式的進步，加上國際賽的好成績，整個聯盟往更好的方向走，是很好的成長。」
聯盟將議約日改訂為1月15日，伍鐸認為是很好的突破。伍鐸說：「過往還有228條款時，各隊可能覺得隔天再來準備球季就好，現在各隊都有建置更完善的球探機制系統，其實每個球季結束後，各隊也大概在季末知道明年誰續約、自由市場鎖定誰，現在議約日提前，球隊更能早點佈署隔年戰力，會幫助每個球隊都進步。」
伍鐸透露，他剛來台灣時，各隊球探部門至多1、2人，到現在各隊編成部門和情蒐部門都增援，整個聯盟往更好方向準備，也讓每個球隊都更游刃有餘思考未來編成。
À surveiller
Perspective IA — des possibilités, pas des certitudes
Teams will be able to finalize their foreign player rosters earlier in the offseason.
Très probable · En quelques mois
The overall competitiveness of the CPBL may increase due to better roster planning.
Probable · Moyen terme
Questions ouvertes
- How will this change specifically impact the recruitment strategies of individual teams?
- Are there any other clauses related to foreign players that are being considered for revision?
- What was the exact reasoning behind the original '228 Foreign Player Clause'?
- Will this change lead to more long-term foreign player contracts in the CPBL?
