Dernière minute
CN俄軍機逼近英國航艦 遭F-35B升空攔截TRTrendyol Süper Lig 2026-2027 Sezonu Fikstür Çekimi Tarihleri Belli OlduCN台南平實、虎尾寮重劃區交通改善計畫 房價上看6字頭TRTrump, 7 Temmuz'da Türkiye'ye Resmi Ziyaret GerçekleştirecekVNLực lượng Không gian Mỹ hoàn thành nhiệm vụ Victus Haze, đánh dấu lần đầu hai tàu vũ trụ thương mại tự hành đối đầu trên quỹ đạoDEFernwärmeatlas: Fast jede zweite Wohnung in Deutschland könnte theoretisch mit Fernwärme beheizt werdenDEFifa-Entscheidung zu Balogun löst internationale Empörung ausBRSanta Casa de Pindamonhangaba recebe R$ 10 milhões em investimentos para nova ala e maternidadeRUРоссия представит МАГАТЭ факты атак Киева на Запорожскую АЭСTRAdalet Bakanlığı Personel Alımı Başvuru Sonuçları Ne Zaman Açıklanacak?CN俄軍機逼近英國航艦 遭F-35B升空攔截TRTrendyol Süper Lig 2026-2027 Sezonu Fikstür Çekimi Tarihleri Belli OlduCN台南平實、虎尾寮重劃區交通改善計畫 房價上看6字頭TRTrump, 7 Temmuz'da Türkiye'ye Resmi Ziyaret GerçekleştirecekVNLực lượng Không gian Mỹ hoàn thành nhiệm vụ Victus Haze, đánh dấu lần đầu hai tàu vũ trụ thương mại tự hành đối đầu trên quỹ đạoDEFernwärmeatlas: Fast jede zweite Wohnung in Deutschland könnte theoretisch mit Fernwärme beheizt werdenDEFifa-Entscheidung zu Balogun löst internationale Empörung ausBRSanta Casa de Pindamonhangaba recebe R$ 10 milhões em investimentos para nova ala e maternidadeRUРоссия представит МАГАТЭ факты атак Киева на Запорожскую АЭСTRAdalet Bakanlığı Personel Alımı Başvuru Sonuçları Ne Zaman Açıklanacak?
Newsgather
BackDOJ Ends Criminal Crackdown on Diesel Emissions System Removal
DOJ Ends Criminal Crackdown on Diesel Emissions System Removal
En développement
The Independent World23.06.2026Politique4 dk okuma

DOJ Ends Criminal Crackdown on Diesel Emissions System Removal

L'essentiel

  • The Department of Justice has ceased its criminal prosecution of mechanics and garage owners for removing emissions control systems from diesel trucks.
  • This policy shift halts a federal effort against illegal "defeat devices" and aligns with the Trump administration's deregulation efforts, though civil penalties will continue.

Résumé généré par IA

Pourquoi c'est important

The DOJ's decision ends a federal campaign against the removal of emissions controls from diesel trucks, a practice that significantly increases pollution. This shift aligns with deregulation efforts and moves enforcement towards civil penalties.

Taille de police

The Department of Justice has ended its criminal crackdown on mechanics and garage owners who remove emissions control systems from diesel trucks.

The decision marks a major U.S. policy shift, halting a yearslong federal effort to prosecute the sale and installation of illegal “defeat devices” used to boost vehicle performance, The New York Times reports.

In an announcement shared on X earlier this year, the Justice Department stated it was “exercising its enforcement discretion” to stop pursuing criminal charges. The post, which received minimal attention outside the automotive sector, stated that the department was “committed to sound enforcement principles, efficient use of government resources, and avoiding over-criminalization of federal environmental law.”

Though federal authorities stated they would continue to pursue civil lawsuits and financial penalties, the sudden policy shift has immediately affected ongoing criminal cases across the country, prompting prosecutors to drop active charges.

The change aligns with broader efforts by the Trump administration to scale back clean-air regulations, which officials argue place an unnecessary financial burden on businesses.

The decision effectively ends an enforcement campaign that federal agencies previously described as vital for public health. According to an Environmental Protection Agency report from 2020, more than 550,000 diesel pickup trucks had their emissions controls removed between 2010 and 2020. That figure accounts for roughly 15 percent of all certified diesel trucks nationwide.

The EPA calculated that removing these systems allows trucks to emit nitrogen oxides at up to 300 times the legal limit.

To illustrate the scale of the pollution, the agency determined that the excess emissions from those 550,000 modified trucks had the same environmental impact as adding more than nine million standard, unmodified diesel pickups to American roads. Nitrogen oxides contribute significantly to smog and respiratory illnesses, while diesel exhaust also releases fine particulate matter that can damage lungs and enter the bloodstream.

Federal interest in these workarounds intensified following the 2015 Volkswagen scandal, in which the automaker was caught using secret software to cheat laboratory emissions tests.

After that case, federal prosecutors began targeting smaller independent shops that sold hardware and software kits allowing everyday truck owners to “delete” their factory emissions systems. These modifications became popular because factory pollution-control systems can strain engines, lower fuel efficiency and trigger a vehicle’s computer to enter an inoperable “limp mode” when a component fails.

The abrupt end to criminal enforcement has drawn criticism from former prosecutors.

Vanessa Waldref, a former U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Washington who oversaw several defeat device investigations, told The New York Times that the policy shift was frustrating. Waldref, now a partner at the firm Singleton Schreiber, emphasized that her team was confident in the legal framework of their investigations.

“Criminal enforcement is a critically important tool for really sending an important message of accountability, and what our community standards should be for protecting public health and the environment,” Waldref said, adding that relying solely on civil fines risks turning penalties into “just the cost of doing business.”

Conversely, defense attorneys and defendants argue that the criminal charges were an overreach.

Stewart Cables, an attorney based in Boulder, Colorado, who represents people accused of installing these devices, told the publication that defense lawyers had long maintained that the Clean Air Act only authorizes civil lawsuits, not felony charges, for vehicle emissions tampering. Cables argued that criminal liability should apply only to stationary pollution sources like factories.

“We believe that the Trump administration got it right when they eliminated the criminal liability for this conduct,” Cables said. “If you want to make tampering with a mobile source a felony, go to Congress.”

The policy shift has left previous defendants facing permanent criminal records.

Mackenzie Spurlock, the 31-year-old owner of Matanuska Diesel in Wasilla, Alaska, pleaded guilty last year after a 2022 EPA raid revealed he had been paid to remove emissions controls from at least 20 vehicles. Spurlock received probation and a $32,000 fine, and his felony status now prevents him from rejoining the National Guard.

Spurlock told The New York Times that factory emissions systems frequently fail during freezing Alaskan winters, leaving motorists stranded.

“Nobody wants to hurt the environment,” Spurlock said. “It isn’t about trying to break the law. People want reliability.”

À surveiller

Perspective IA — des possibilités, pas des certitudes

  • DOJ will focus solely on civil penalties for emissions system removal.

    Très probable · Immédiat

  • Increased use of civil lawsuits against mechanics and owners.

    Probable · Court terme

Questions ouvertes

  • Will civil penalties deter widespread removal?
  • What is the long-term environmental impact?
  • Will Congress address the legal ambiguity?

Sujets liés

This article was originally published by The Independent World.

Articles liés

California Yoga Instructor Battles San Diego's Beachfront Class Ban
En développement·27 dk önce

California Yoga Instructor Battles San Diego's Beachfront Class Ban

A California yoga instructor, known as "Namasteve," is fighting San Diego's ordinance that prohibits teaching yoga to four or more people at local beaches and parks. Steven Hubbard, who has taught yoga for 17 years and accepts voluntary donations, argues the law violates his free speech rights. He has filed multiple lawsuits, with a federal appeals court previously ruling that teaching yoga is protected speech.

The Independent World
Plus sur ce sujetemissions control