Trump Administration Prepares to Send Controversial Saudi Nuclear Deal to Congress
L'essentiel
- The Trump administration is preparing to send a controversial nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia to Congress.
- The deal omits key safeguards like the "Gold Standard" and "Additional Protocol," raising concerns about nuclear weapons development pathways, especially given Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's past statements linking the kingdom's nuclear ambitions to Iran.
Résumé généré par IA
Pourquoi c'est important
The Trump administration is preparing to send Congress a nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia that omits critical nonproliferation safeguards, contrasting with previous US deals and raising concerns about Saudi nuclear weapons development.
President Donald Trump's administration is preparing to send Congress a controversial nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia that would leave out key safeguards designed to make it harder for the kingdom to develop a nuclear weapon, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The proposed deal, expected to be submitted within days, would clear the way for U.S. companies to help Saudi Arabia build a multibillion-dollar civilian nuclear energy industry. But unlike previous U.S. nuclear agreements with some allies, it would not include restrictions that critics say are vital to preventing nuclear weapons development.
The agreement, known as a "123 Agreement" under the U.S. Atomic Energy Act, was signed by Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman after a preliminary accord reached in Riyadh last year, the sources said. The White House and Energy Department did not respond to requests for comment.
According to the sources, the deal does not include the so-called "Gold Standard," which bars countries from enriching uranium or reprocessing spent nuclear fuel—two technologies that can be used to produce fuel for civilian reactors but also provide pathways to building nuclear weapons.
The agreement also omits the "Additional Protocol," an international safeguard that gives the International Atomic Energy Agency broader authority to inspect undeclared nuclear sites.
One of the sources said the proposed agreement creates a legal framework that could allow cooperation on parts of the nuclear fuel cycle, including uranium enrichment, although it does not require the United States to transfer enrichment technology.
The missing safeguards are likely to fuel concerns in Congress because Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has previously linked the kingdom's nuclear ambitions to Iran.
In a 2018 interview with CBS, the crown prince said Saudi Arabia did not want a nuclear bomb but added: "Without a doubt, if Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible."
Saudi Arabia has also repeatedly insisted it should retain the right to enrich uranium—a position the United Arab Emirates rejected when it accepted the tougher "Gold Standard" as part of its 2009 nuclear cooperation agreement with Washington.
Once the agreement reaches Congress, lawmakers will have about 90 legislative days to review it. Blocking the deal would require Congress to pass a joint resolution and override any presidential veto with a two-thirds majority.
Democrats and some Republicans have long argued that any U.S.-Saudi nuclear agreement should include strict nonproliferation safeguards. Among them was Marco Rubio, now Trump's secretary of state, who previously called for tougher restrictions while serving in the Senate.
À surveiller
Perspective IA — des possibilités, pas des certitudes
Congress will review the nuclear agreement.
Très probable · En quelques semaines
Questions ouvertes
- How will Congress react to the proposed agreement?
- Will the White House or Energy Department comment on the missing safeguards?







