Newsgather
Back高鐵延伸屏東「小港潮州案」不可行 鐵道局:衝擊大、執行困難
高鐵延伸屏東「小港潮州案」不可行 鐵道局:衝擊大、執行困難
Politics
自由时报5/20/2026Politics2 min readChina

高鐵延伸屏東「小港潮州案」不可行 鐵道局:衝擊大、執行困難

Quick Look

民眾連署呼籲高鐵延伸屏東採「小港潮州案」,但鐵道局評估此方案因需穿越高雄市中心建築、工程條件受限且缺乏設站空間,執行困難度極高,不可行。

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

The High-Speed Rail extension to Pingtung is proceeding with the 'Kaohsiung plan,' which involves adding a station at Kaohsiung Railway Station and extending to Pingtung Liukuai Cuo. A public proposal has emerged advocating for the 'Xiaogang-Chaozhou plan' to better serve more residents and boost development in the southernmost part of Taiwan.

Font size

高鐵延伸屏東計畫政院已敲定採「高雄案」,於台鐵高雄車站增設高鐵高雄站,並延伸至屏東六塊厝設高鐵屏東站,全案已進入二階環評。

近日有民眾於公共政策平台發起提案連署,呼籲改採「小港潮州案」,從高鐵左營往南延伸至小港機場設站,再延伸至屏東潮州設站,以嘉惠更多高屏居民的需求,也可帶動台灣最南端的發展。

核定的「高雄案」全長26.2公里,地下段18.4公里、高架7.6公里,初估經費約2500億元。

事實上,鐵道局提出「高雄案」,就已針對其他多個替代方案性評估,其中關於「小港潮州案」,是沿著台鐵、愛河、省道台17線路廊,通過小港機場後採高架方式延伸,並在高雄大寮區跨越高屏溪在屏東潮州鎮設站。

鐵道局報告指出,「小港潮州案」經多方檢討,高雄市中心的前金區、苓雅區並無適當路廊可供通過,恐須穿越市中心200餘棟建築,對都市環境與居民權益衝擊重大;另小港機場南側還有捷運紅線及地下石化管線等,工程條件受限,且缺乏適當設站空間,整體執行困難度極高,因此「不具推動可行性」。

Open Questions

  • What are the specific impacts of the 'Kaohsiung plan' on urban environments and residents?
  • Are there any other alternative plans being considered besides the 'Kaohsiung plan' and the rejected 'Xiaogang-Chaozhou plan'?
  • What is the timeline for the second-stage environmental impact assessment for the 'Kaohsiung plan'?
  • What are the projected economic and developmental benefits of the 'Kaohsiung plan' for Pingtung and southern Taiwan?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by 自由时报.

Related Stories

More on this topic高鐵