Angela Rayner criticizes UK government's proposed visa rule changes
Quick Look
Angela Rayner has strongly criticized the UK government's proposed changes to visa rules, calling it "un-British" to extend settlement waiting times for migrants already in the UK, particularly care workers.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The UK government is consulting on changes to immigration rules, which could significantly extend the time migrant workers, particularly in the care sector, must wait for permanent residency. This proposal has drawn criticism from within the Labour Party.
Former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has said changing visa rules for migrants already living in the UK would be "the wrong thing to do", repeating her criticism of some of the Labour government's immigration policies.
Rayner told the BBC it would be "un-British" to make care staff already in the UK wait for up to 15 years - rather than the current five - before being allowed to settle permanently.
She said controlling the borders was "completely different" to taking "retrospective action on people who have made a life here".
The UK government has consulted on immigration rule changes and a decision on the permanent residency of migrant workers already living in the UK is yet to be made.
A UK government spokesperson said: "Our position has not changed, and the route to settlement will double from five to 10 years.
"We will always welcome those that come to this country and contribute to our national life. But the privilege of living here forever should be earned, not automatic."
The spokesperson said the country had experienced historically high levels of migration in recent years, adding the government "must be honest about the scale and impact of hundreds of thousands of low-skilled migrants getting settlement".
Speaking at a rally organised by the public service union Unison on Wednesday, Rayner said there should be no retrospective rule changes to settlement for care workers "who follow the rules and contribute to our society".
"Care workers helped us through the darkest days of the pandemic," Rayner said. "Care is a system we may all need, and rely upon.
"So I for one won't rest until all those who give and receive care do so with the dignity and respect they deserve."
Rayner first expressed concerns about applying changes to the immigration system retrospectively in March.
At the time, Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham - who is Labour's candidate in the Makerfield by-election - said he understood where Rayner was "coming from" and that the party "would do well to listen to what Angela has to say".
But at the start of the Makerfield by-election campaign, Burnham said he agreed with the "broad thrust" of the Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood's approach.
Settlement, also known as indefinite leave to remain, gives a person the right to live, work and study in the UK for as long as they like and apply for benefits if they are eligible.
Ministers want to double the time it takes for most migrants to qualify for permanent residence from five to 10 years.
Under the proposals, people who arrived on health and social care visas would face a 15-year wait, while those who relied on benefits for more than 12 months would have to wait 20 years.
Mahmood has defended the plans, saying the "unprecedented" number of people arriving in the UK demands an answer from the government.
But dozens of Labour MPs have opposed the plans, branding the retrospective approach "un-British" and "moving the goalposts".
Speaking to the BBC, Rayner said she did not want to comment on a hypothetical Labour leadership contest.
But she did have a clear message for whoever is in charge.
"We shouldn't rip up the rules halfway through – taking retrospective action on people who are taxpayers, who are making a contribution, who are part of our society looking after our most vulnerable," Rayner said.
She added she supported controlling the UK's borders but that this was different from the issue of settlement rights for legal migrants.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The UK government will likely proceed with some form of changes to the settlement rules, though the specifics may be adjusted due to internal and external pressure.
Likely · Within months
Further public statements and campaigning from Labour figures and unions opposing the retrospective changes are expected.
Very likely · Within weeks
Open Questions
- What will be the final decision on the proposed immigration rule changes?
- What is the exact timeline for implementing any new rules?
- How many individuals will be directly affected by these changes?
- What are the potential economic and social impacts of these changes on the care sector and the wider UK economy?




