Australia's race discrimination commissioner criticizes opposition's immigration stance
Quick Look
- Australia's federal race discrimination commissioner, Giridharan Sivaraman, accused the federal opposition and One Nation of "dehumanising" and "scapegoating" immigrants, drawing on "deep vein of racism".
- Opposition leader Angus Taylor defended his party's immigration policy, blaming Labor for high numbers and housing shortages.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Federal Race Discrimination Commissioner Giridharan Sivaraman has criticized the federal opposition and One Nation for their rhetoric on immigration, accusing them of dehumanizing and scapegoating migrants and drawing on racism. This comes amid ongoing political debate in Australia about immigration levels and their impact on housing and services.
One Nation and the federal opposition are “dehumanising” and “scapegoating” immigrants while drawing on a “deep vein of racism”, Australia’s federal race discrimination commissioner says.
Giridharan Sivaraman made the comments as part of a panel discussion at a Brisbane seminar on human rights, hosted by the state’s human rights commission.
Asked what his priority issues were, Sivaraman said the country was facing “a very pronounced political fault line”.
“On one side of that fault line you have two parties, a populist party and now the federal opposition, who are dehumanising, scapegoating migrants,” he said on Wednesday.
Together, they encouraged people to blame migrants for everything from the housing crisis and traffic to the cost of milk, he said.
“That is implicitly racist, because … the only signal as to whether someone is a migrant usually is the colour of their skin, or their name, or their accent, and it draws on this deep vein of racism that’s always existed from the time of colonisation” he said.
“This notion that some people belong here more than others or some people are superior to others.”
Announcing a new policy on immigration last month, the opposition leader, Angus Taylor, said “many” migrants would be a “net drain” on Australia and announced that his approach would be to “discriminate based on values”.
Immigration was also a centrepiece of his budget reply speech last week. He proposed reducing overall numbers by using a cap based on housing construction and banning non-citizens from schemes like jobseeker, the age pension, and the NDIS.
“This is about mass migration running ahead of the homes, roads, hospitals, schools and services Australia can provide,” Taylor said in the speech to parliament.
Sivaraman said that over the next two years, he expected an escalation in “the racism that accompanies” blaming immigrants, posing a “significant issue” for his work.
“The only way we’ll actually deal with that - I think that racism, effectively - is to build class solidarity … between black, brown, and white people,” he said.
“Because until you can convince a white worker that it’s in their interest to combat racism - that racism is actually one of the causes of their inequity - you’re not going to build solidarity”.
In response to the comments, Taylor said: “This is the government’s failure, not that of migrant communities.
“We think migration is incredibly important to this country. It always has been and it always will be.
“But the numbers have been too high and standards to low. The numbers got up to 550,000 in a year and housing construction was going backwards.
“It’s no wonder young Australians can’t get into a home. Labor is not only exceeding their own migration targets every year, they’re not even meeting their housing targets. They’re building about 70,000 houses a year under their target.”
A spokesperson for Senator Pauline Hanson denied that the party was racist or populist or had dehumanised or scapegoated migrants.
“We don’t have a problem with migrants, we don’t, and we’re not anti-migration,” he said.
“We advocate lower immigration to reduce demand for housing in this country.”
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Escalation in rhetoric and political debate surrounding immigration and racism in Australia.
Very likely · Within months
Increased scrutiny of immigration policies and their social impact.
Likely · Within months
Open Questions
- What specific policies will the government implement to address the commissioner's concerns?
- How will the public react to the ongoing debate on immigration and racism?
- Will the opposition's stance on immigration gain further traction?
- What are the long-term implications of this rhetoric on social cohesion in Australia?


