Civil Servant Ian Collard Declines to Appear Before Foreign Affairs Committee
The Foreign Office has blocked the official involved in Lord Mandelson's vetting from giving oral evidence to MPs
Quick Look
- The Foreign Office has declined a request for civil servant Ian Collard to testify before the Foreign Affairs Committee regarding the vetting of Lord Mandelson.
- Collard will provide evidence in writing instead, as an independent review investigates the security clearance process.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The controversy centers on whether Sir Olly Robbins was properly informed about security concerns regarding Lord Mandelson's appointment as ambassador to the US before granting him clearance.
A key figure in the row over Lord Mandelson's vetting will not appear to give evidence before a parliamentary committee of MPs.
The Foreign Affairs Committee had asked the Foreign Office if Ian Collard, a civil servant who ran the security team within the department, could attend next week.
But the committee's chair Dame Emily Thornberry said the department made the "decision to decline" the request and Collard will only be giving evidence in writing.
Collard was the official who briefed the then-Foreign Office boss Sir Olly Robbins about UK Security and Vetting's (UKSV) recommendation not to give clearance to Mandelson.
Sir Olly was sacked last week after it emerged that he had granted clearance against the recommendation and had not informed No 10.
The government says UKSV gave an explicit recommendation to the Foreign Office not to approve vetting for Lord Mandelson ahead of his confirmation as ambassador to the US.
But speaking to MPs on Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee this week, Sir Olly said he had never seen that explicit recommendation and only received a verbal briefing which described UKSV's view as "borderline" and "leaning towards recommending that clearance be denied".
The government is investigating whether Sir Olly was given the correct information before he approved security clearance for the peer.
Sir Adrian Fulford, a retired judge, is conducting a review into the process and it is understood he will look at whether the briefing given by Collard correctly summed up the vetting team's view.
That information could be crucial to determine whether Sir Keir Starmer was right to sack Sir Olly last week.
In a letter to the interim Foreign Office boss, Dame Emily set out some questions for Collard to answer in writing, including: "How often did his team make a different recommendation on vetting to that contained in the UKSV report?"
The Foreign Office has not commented on Collard not appearing in front of the committee.
Sir Keir's former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney will give evidence to the committee on Tuesday.
McSweeney, who advised the prime minister to appoint Lord Mandelson as the UK's ambassador to the US, is likely to face questions about whether he put pressure on civil servants to speed up the vetting.
It comes after Robbins accused No 10 of a "dismissive" attitude towards the process - a claim Downing Street has denied.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Foreign Affairs Committee will press for further documentation regarding the briefing given by Ian Collard.
Likely · Within weeks
Morgan McSweeney will face intense questioning regarding his role in the appointment process.
Very likely · Within days
Open Questions
- Why did the Foreign Office decide to decline the request for oral evidence?
- Did Morgan McSweeney exert pressure on civil servants regarding the vetting process?






