Breaking
ESJürgen Klopp, nuevo seleccionador de Alemania, promete revivir la selecciónESIncendio en la Comunidad de Madrid: 10 municipios evacuados y 30.000 personas afectadasESIncendio forestal en Madrid pone en riesgo instalaciones clave de la NASAESIncendios en Madrid y Ávila: Frentes se fusionan, día crítico para evitar mayor uniónESFrancia lucha contra incendios forestales descontrolados en el surESIncendios en España: Críticas a Marlaska por falta de previsión y 10.000 evacuadosESLos hutíes reactivan la escalada en Yemen con ataques a petroleros saudíesESLa UE acoge con cautela los nuevos aranceles de Trump, pero cuestiona su justificaciónESJuez Calama mantiene investigación a Zapatero por rescate de Plus UltraESGuardia Civil detiene a una persona e investiga a otra por incendio forestal en Burgohondo (Ávila)ESJürgen Klopp, nuevo seleccionador de Alemania, promete revivir la selecciónESIncendio en la Comunidad de Madrid: 10 municipios evacuados y 30.000 personas afectadasESIncendio forestal en Madrid pone en riesgo instalaciones clave de la NASAESIncendios en Madrid y Ávila: Frentes se fusionan, día crítico para evitar mayor uniónESFrancia lucha contra incendios forestales descontrolados en el surESIncendios en España: Críticas a Marlaska por falta de previsión y 10.000 evacuadosESLos hutíes reactivan la escalada en Yemen con ataques a petroleros saudíesESLa UE acoge con cautela los nuevos aranceles de Trump, pero cuestiona su justificaciónESJuez Calama mantiene investigación a Zapatero por rescate de Plus UltraESGuardia Civil detiene a una persona e investiga a otra por incendio forestal en Burgohondo (Ávila)
Newsgather
BackCJI Surya Kant Refutes Reports on Refusing Student Protest Plea, Cites No Formal Filing
CJI Surya Kant Refutes Reports on Refusing Student Protest Plea, Cites No Formal Filing
Developing
Times of India16 hours agoPolitics1 min readIndia

CJI Surya Kant Refutes Reports on Refusing Student Protest Plea, Cites No Formal Filing

Quick Look

  • Chief Justice of India Surya Kant clarified that he did not refuse to list a petition challenging police action against students during a July 20 protest, stating no formal plea had been filed, only a letter representation.
  • He criticized media for "irresponsible and reckless" reporting.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

The Chief Justice of India clarified that no formal petition was filed in the Supreme Court regarding police action against students during a July 20 protest, despite media reports suggesting he refused to hear such a plea. He described the media coverage as "irresponsible and reckless."

Font size

NEW DELHI: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Friday refuted reports that he had refused to list a petition challenging the police action against students during the Cockroach Janta Party’s protest march, clarifying that no such plea had been filed in the Supreme Court. The CJI said a lawyer had merely mentioned a letter representation before the court dismissed reports that he had declined to hear a properly instituted case. "In the last two days, a completely false statement was made that a matter was filed," the CJI said. He added that until 10am on Friday, "not a single page" had been filed in the court. "It was one representation sent by that Mishra or someone. How can I treat the representation as a writ petition? And people start recklessly reporting this," he said, describing the coverage as "irresponsible and reckless". The clarification came two days after a lawyer mentioned the issue before a bench headed by the CJI and sought an urgent hearing over the alleged use of force against students during the July 20 protest. The lawyer told the court that videos purportedly showing police action against students were available and requested that the matter be listed the following day. The bench, however, declined to examine the videos at the mentioning stage. "We are not interested in videos; we don’t have time to watch," the CJI had said. When the lawyer again referred to the alleged beating of students, the CJI responded: "Don’t waste our time. We don’t want to watch any videos." The CJI’s latest remarks indicate that the exchange occurred during an oral mentioning based on a representation, rather than the urgent listing of a formally filed writ petition. The controversy followed clashes during the Cockroach Janta Party-led ‘Sansad Chalo’ march on July 20. Police used lathis and tear gas to disperse protesters who attempted to move towards Parliament. The demonstrators were demanding the resignation of Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan over the alleged NEET paper leak and wider irregularities in competitive examinations.

Open Questions

  • Will a formal writ petition be filed regarding the police action?
  • How will the media respond to the CJI's criticism?
  • What is the status of the investigation into the alleged NEET paper leak?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by Times of India.

Related Stories

क्या सोनम वांगचुक ने धर्मेंद्र प्रधान के इस्तीफ़े की मांग छोड़ दी है? गीतांजलि अंगमो ने ये कहा
Developing·5 hours ago

क्या सोनम वांगचुक ने धर्मेंद्र प्रधान के इस्तीफ़े की मांग छोड़ दी है? गीतांजलि अंगमो ने ये कहा

सोनम वांगचुक ने केंद्रीय मंत्रियों जेपी नड्डा और जितेंद्र सिंह की मौजूदगी में 26 दिनों का अनशन तोड़ा। इस कदम से धर्मेंद्र प्रधान के इस्तीफ़े की मांग छोड़ने, सीजेपी से मतभेद और भविष्य की रणनीति पर सवाल उठ रहे हैं, जिस पर उनकी पत्नी गीतांजलि अंगमो ने बीबीसी से बात की।

BBC हिंदी
1 min read
More on this topicchief justice of india