Breaking
ARNorway's Prime Minister reveals that Zelensky's plane was almost hit by a drone while taking off from MoldovaFRNigerian influencer critical of government killed at home in KanoCNUS Sanctions Chinese-Language Marketplace Xinbi Guarantee in Cybercrime CrackdownTRWhile US-Iran Tension Continues, Explosion Sounds Heard in the South of IranAUGlobal Markets Slide as Wall Street and Europe Close Lower, Aussie Shares Expected to FollowTRGalatasaray Coach Okan Buruk: The Referee Directed the Match Against UsITArsenal beat Napoli 1-0 in the Champions League thanks to Odegaard late onPLCoco Gauff defeated Elina Andreeva and advanced to the semifinals of the US OpenRUMedvedev said about the possibility of Russia to strike NATO facilitiesUSChampions League League Phase Begins with Real Madrid Win, Expert Picks for Matchday 1ARNorway's Prime Minister reveals that Zelensky's plane was almost hit by a drone while taking off from MoldovaFRNigerian influencer critical of government killed at home in KanoCNUS Sanctions Chinese-Language Marketplace Xinbi Guarantee in Cybercrime CrackdownTRWhile US-Iran Tension Continues, Explosion Sounds Heard in the South of IranAUGlobal Markets Slide as Wall Street and Europe Close Lower, Aussie Shares Expected to FollowTRGalatasaray Coach Okan Buruk: The Referee Directed the Match Against UsITArsenal beat Napoli 1-0 in the Champions League thanks to Odegaard late onPLCoco Gauff defeated Elina Andreeva and advanced to the semifinals of the US OpenRUMedvedev said about the possibility of Russia to strike NATO facilitiesUSChampions League League Phase Begins with Real Madrid Win, Expert Picks for Matchday 1
Newsgather
All StoriesWorldSportsFinanceTechScienceHealthCultureClimatePoliticsSpace
BackEski Amazon çalışanları, hamile çalışanlara karşı ayrımcılık iddialarıyla dava açtı
Eski Amazon çalışanları, hamile çalışanlara karşı ayrımcılık iddialarıyla dava açtı
Developing
AA Güncel1 hour agoHukuk1 min readTürkiyeView translation

Eski Amazon çalışanları, hamile çalışanlara karşı ayrımcılık iddialarıyla dava açtı

amazonhamile çalışanayrımcılık

Quick Look

  • New York'taki federal mahkemede, eski Amazon depo çalışanlarından oluşan bir grup, şirketin hamile çalışanlara karşı sistematik ayrımcılık yaptığını ve 2022 Hamile Çalışanların Adil Muamele Yasasını ihlal ettiğini iddia ederek toplu dava açtı.
  • Davacılar, bazı çalışanların hastane ziyaretleri için izin istemesine veya ihtiyaç molası almasına rağmen cezalandırıldığını ve yöneticilerin tabure veya tuvalet molası sağlamayı reddettiğini belirtti.
  • Amazon ise iddiaları reddederek dava dilekçesindeki anlatımın yanlış olduğunu öne sürdü.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

2022 Hamile Çalışanların Adil Muamele Yasası, ABD Kongresi tarafından iki partinin desteğiyle kabul edilmiş ve Haziran 2023'te yürürlüğe girmiştir. Bu yasa, 15 veya daha fazla çalışanı olan işverenlerin hamilelik ve doğumla ilgili tıbbi durumlar için 'makul bir düzenleme' sağlamasını zorunlu kılar.

Font size

Eski Amazon depo çalışanlarından oluşan bir grup, şirketi hamile çalışanlara karşı sistematik ayrımcılık yapmakla suçlayarak dava açtı.

Dava dosyasında, hamile çalışanlara "temel olanakların sağlanmadığı", bazı hastane ziyaretleri için izin isteyen çalışanların veya ihtiyaç molası alan bebekli annelerin cezalandırıldıkları iddia edildi.

New York'taki bir federal mahkemede görülen davada dört kadın Amazon'u, 2022 Hamile Çalışanların Adil Muamele Yasası'nı ihlal etmekle suçlayarak ülke çapında toplu dava açma önerisinde bulundu.

Diğer taraftan, Amazon tarafından yapılan açıklamada, söz konusu iddialar reddedilirken, dava dilekçesindeki olayların anlatımının yanlış olduğu öne sürüldü.

Davacılar, Amazon deposundaki yöneticilerin hamile bir çalışana tabure sağlamayı veya tuvalet molası vermeyi reddederek federal yasayı ihlal etmekle suçladı.

2022 Hamile Çalışanların Adil Muamele Yasası, ABD Kongresi tarafından iki partinin de desteğiyle kabul edilmiş ve Haziran 2023'te yürürlüğe girmişti.

Bu yasa, 15 veya daha fazla çalışanı olan işverenlerin hamilelik ve doğumla ilgili tıbbi durumlar için "makul bir düzenleme" sağlamasını gerektiriyor.

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • Mahkeme, dava dilekçesindeki iddiaların geçerliliği hakkında ilk kararını verecek.

    Likely · Within weeks

Open Questions

  • Davacılar tarafından belirtilen özel olayların sayısı nedir?
  • Amazon'un iç politikaları hamile çalışanlar için şu anda nasıl uygulanıyor?
  • Davanın sonuçları ne zaman bekleniyor?

Related Topics

amazon
PeopleDavacılarAmazon yöneticileri
OrganizationsAmazon
PlacesNew YorkAmazon deposu
Topicshamile çalışanayrımcılık2022 hamile çalışanların adil muamele yasanıfederal davanew yorkiş hakları
This article was originally published by AA Güncel.

Related Stories

Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor's Office responded to the allegations regarding Super League match broadcasts
Developing·

Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor's Office responded to the allegations regarding Super League match broadcasts

Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor's Office announced that the allegations about detainees who were prevented from watching Super League matches do not reflect the truth. There are 50 free television channels in penal institutions, and match broadcasts are covered by dividend income from the escrow accounts of convicts and detainees. Since the publisher's subscription has turned into commercial status, this resource has become insufficient for the 2026-2027 season and no new subscription requests have been received.

Hürriyet Gündem
1 min read
Demirkol stated that his statement dated August 26, 2026 lasted 3-4 hours and that he may not remember it correctly due to stress.
Developing·

Demirkol stated that his statement dated August 26, 2026 lasted 3-4 hours and that he may not remember it correctly due to stress.

In his statement taken within the scope of the investigation regarding Denizolgun's incident on September 7, 2016, Demirkol stated that his statement dated August 26, 2026 lasted 3-4 hours, that he was hungry and thirsty, that he was sweating from stress, and that his hands were shaking. 'It is not possible for me to reach enough truth in this stressful environment. He said, "It is difficult for me to clearly remember the events of 10 years ago" and did not accept the charge of false statement.

Milliyet Son Dakika
1 min read
22 years and 6 months imprisonment requested for Abdullah Aybaba in the Sami Bey Apartment case
Developing·

22 years and 6 months imprisonment requested for Abdullah Aybaba in the Sami Bey Apartment case

40 people lost their lives and 2 people were injured in the February 6 earthquakes in Sami Bey Apartment in Güzelyalı District of Adana's Çukurova district. Adana Chief Public Prosecutor's Office filed a lawsuit against the building's contractors Abdullah Aybaba and Eda Aybaba Çelik, as well as Seyhan Municipality's former Zoning Director Alim Erdoğan and former Survey and Survey Technician Sunay Meydan, demanding imprisonment of up to 22 years and 6 months each for the crime of 'causing the death and injury of more than one person through conscious negligence'. The files were combined and the detained Abdullah Aybaba was connected to the hearing via SEGBİS from prison. Defendant Aybaba stated that no cement or material was stolen in the building, and that during the earthquake, the upper floors first shook and broke away, and then the building collapsed. Mehmet Üsgüloğlu, the victim's lawyer, demanded a separate life sentence for each death, saying that the defendant should have fled abroad and reported the situation if he had good intentions. Abdullah Aybaba stated that he wanted to come to Adana after the first earthquake, but went abroad due to threatening posts, and then returned to the country with his own consent when he learned that a red notice had been issued. Victim lawyer Dudu Büşra Maksutoğlu Karadeniz stated that the defendant fled the country one day after the earthquake and requested life imprisonment for each deceased separately. Defendant Aybaba's lawyer stated that his client was 78 years old, prison conditions were harsh, and requested that he be released under house arrest. Eda Aybaba Çelik's lawyer, on the other hand, said that his client only became a partner of the company in 1994 in accordance with the legal procedure, did not make any profit and had no construction-related activities, and asked for an arrest warrant not for arrest, but for testifying. The court decided to continue Abdullah Aybaba's detention, to wait for the execution of the arrest warrant issued with a red notice about Eda Aybaba Çelik, and to reject at this stage his requests for a new expert report to be prepared by taking a core from Ece Apartment. The next hearing will be held on November 26. During the trial process, it was determined that Abdullah Aybaba went abroad from Istanbul Airport one day after the earthquake, that he did not return to the country later, and that he was detained by the Thai police on April 24, brought to Türkiye on May 15, and his arrest was ordered by the Adana 4th High Criminal Court.

Cumhuriyet
3 min read
The Chief Public Prosecutor's Office Launched an Investigation into the Sharing of Court Hearing Footage on Social Media
Developing·

The Chief Public Prosecutor's Office Launched an Investigation into the Sharing of Court Hearing Footage on Social Media

It was determined that images taken during the hearing of a file that was still being tried at the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court were shared on social media. The Chief Public Prosecutor's Office launched an ex officio investigation against those who recorded and shared images without authorization within the scope of Article 286 of the Turkish Penal Code.

Sabah Gündem
1 min read
Arrested defendants in the Izmir heavy rain disaster case were released
Developing·

Arrested defendants in the Izmir heavy rain disaster case were released

As a result of the investigation launched into the incident in which two young people lost their lives due to the downpour in Izmir on July 12, 2024, a lawsuit was filed against 42 defendants for "negligent homicide". Izmir 10th High Criminal Court gave prison sentences in its first decision, but Izmir Regional Administrative Court 14th Criminal Chamber annulled its decision and released the detained defendants. A third expert report was added to the case, emphasizing the incident's relationship with long-term infrastructure design defects and a decision was made to appoint a new expert panel.

Milliyet Son Dakika
2 min read
More on this topicamazon